Ferroptosis and Its Potential Role in Lung Cancer: Updated Evidence from Pathogenesis to Therapy

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the main causes of tumor-related death worldwide, and its high incidence rate and mortality have become the focus of the world, which is responsible for approximately 18.4% of all cancer mortalities.^1,2 However, traditional therapies (ie surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy), novel molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy have not brought desirable benefits to patients reaching advanced stages of the disease.³ Consequently, clinicians face the dilemma that there is considerable ambiguity in the most appropriate consolidation treatment for patients with advanced stages of lung cancer. Therefore, further exploring the occurrence and development mechanisms of lung cancer, discovering new therapeutic targets, and finding effective therapeutic methods and drugs should be urgently designed and implemented.

Cell death is important for mammalian development and homeostasis and is fully integrated with the physiological function and pathological state of an organism.⁴ The orchestration of cell death both spatially and/or temporally is critical for the development of various human diseases.⁵ Regarding most of the different cells in the body, cell death can be conventionally divided into four distinctive types: apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis.⁶ In 2012, a new non-apoptotic cell death pattern caused by an iron-dependent lipid peroxidation injury was presented and named “Ferroptosis”.⁷

Ferroptosis is a cell death caused by cell membrane damage due to glutathioneperoxidase (GPX) activity failure and intracellular lipid peroxide, accompanied by the iron-dependent production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).^7,8 Its morphology, genetics and biochemical characteristics are significantly different from apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy and pyroptosis (Table 1).⁹ Morphologically, ferroptosis occurs mainly in cells as reduced mitochondrial volume, increased bilayer membrane density and reduction or disappearance of mitochondrial cristae, without nuclear concentration and chromatin marginalization.¹⁰ Generally, the mitochondrion can regulate ROS generation, ferroptosis and cell cycle, and it has been implicated in various malignancies including lung cancer. Furthermore, irradiation and hypoxia promote mitochondrial stress pathways activity to survive the harsh environment. Against normal cells, both the consumption of ROS and irons are elevated in tumor cells as a consequence of increased metabolic rate.^11,12 Consequently, the above changes inhibit ferroptosis in tumor cells. At present, many studies on ferroptosis and lung cancer have made certain progress. Of which, ferroptosis inducers are used as traditional treatment programs and new adjuvants have been shown to be effective in the treatment of lung cancer. Therefore, inducing ferroptosis in lung cancer cells has become a new anti-cancer treatment strategy.^13,14 Generally, ferroptosis plays an important role in the development and therapeutics of lung cancer, which we will describe in detail in the following sections.

Table 1 Cell Morphology, Biochemical Features, and Key Regulators of Necrosis, Autophagy, Apoptosis, Pyroptosis, Ferroptosis

Mechanism of Ferroptosis

To date, the major biochemical processes involved in ferroptosis can be simply comprised of four steps, ie, (i) inactivation of cysteine/glutathione antiporter system Xc⁻ (xCT), (ii) depletion of glutathione and lipid repair enzyme (glutathione peroxidase 4, GPX4), (iii) lipid peroxidation and (iv) excess iron and accumulation of ROS in cells.^15–17 The main regulatory mechanism of ferroptosis is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Main regulatory mechanism of ferroptosis. Iron homeostasis, and lipid peroxidation metabolism are core regulators of ferroptosis. Abbreviations: TFR1, transferrin receptor 1; DMT1, divalent metal ion transporter 1; FPN, ferroportin; IRP, iron regulatory protein; PHD1, prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 1; HSPB1, heat shock protein β-1; FIN56, specific iron death inducer; System Xc-, cystine/glutamate transporter; Cys, cysteine; Glu, glutamic; Gln, glutamine; GLS, glutaminase; GSH, glutathione; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; Hcy, homocysteine; CGL, cystathionine-γ-lyase; HOX1, heme oxygenase-1; PRDX6, peroxide reduction enzyme-6; CISD1, CDGSH iron sulfur domain 1.

Cysteine/Glutathione Antiporter System

The cysteine/glutathione antiporter, also named system Xc⁻, as a trans-membrane protein, is an important intracellular antioxidant element. System Xc⁻ is composed of the light-chain SLC7A11 (xCT) and the heavy-chain SLC3A2 (CD98hc or 4F2hc) and its functions are as raw materials for the synthesis of glutathione (GSH).¹⁸ As its main functional subunit, SLC7A11 encodes a cystine transporter also known as xCT, which is highly specific to cystine and glutamic acid (Glu), responsible for the major transport activity. Additionally, CD98hc as a companion protein maintains the stability of xCT protein.¹⁹ System Xc⁻ regulates the 1:1 exchange of extracellular cystine for intracellular glutamic acid in and out of cells.²⁰ Interestingly, Glu, cysteine (Cys), and glycine (Gly) under the catalysis of glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL) and glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS) generated GSH. On the other hand, GPXs are kinds of highly conservative enzymes on evolution, which are essential components of cellular detoxification systems that defend cells against ROS.²¹ To the best of our knowledge, GPX4 is the core controlling factor in ferroptosis, and the intracellular GSH content directly affects GPX4 enzyme activity.²² Currently, many small-molecule inducers, namely ferroptosis-inducing agents (FINs), are identified as ferroptosis-inducing compounds. Like ras selective lethal 3 (RSL3), FIN56 inhibits GPX4 activity without GSH depletion.^23,24 Inactivation of GPX4 by GSH depletion is found to trigger ferroptosis.^25,26 Thus, elucidation of the factors that underlie the sensitivity of a given cell type to ferroptosis is crucial to understand the physiological and pathophysiological manifestation of ferroptosis and how it may be exploited for the management of cancer.

Iron Metabolism

Iron (Fe) exists in two oxidation states including the ferrous cation (Fe²⁺) and ferric cation (Fe³⁺). Non-haem Fe in food is mainly in the form of Fe³⁺, which is reduced back to Fe²⁺ by Fe reductase, such as duodenal cytochrome b (Dcytb)²⁷ and antioxidant enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in the intestine.²⁸ Dietary Fe enters the intestinal epithelium cells (IECs) via the brush-border transporter divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) and exits through the basolateral membranes.²⁹ Overexpression of DMT1 promoted cell ferroptosis, while knockdown of DMT1 significantly inhibited the ferroptosis.³⁰ Meanwhile, ferrous cation (Fe²⁺) absorbed by IECs is transported by the action of ferroportin-1 (FPN1) on the extracellular side of the membrane. An oxidation of Fe²⁺ into Fe³⁺ by ceruloplasmin (CP), hephaestin (HP) and poly(rC)-binding protein 2 (PCBP2), which combines with transferrin (Tf) to form the Tf (with loading two Fe³⁺) complex.³¹ Then, Tf-Fe3⁺ binds to the transferrin receptor (TfR) forming Fe³⁺-Tf/TfR complex on the cell membrane and internalizes to cell as endosomes,³² whereas Fe³⁺ is released and subsequently transported by six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 3 (STEAP3) reduced to Fe²⁺, where iron enters the cytoplasm via DMT1 on the endosomal membrane.^33,34

Oxidation of excess ferrous iron to the ferric state in the cell cytoplasm is known as unstable iron pool, which has metabolic activity and plays a crucial role in a variety of biological functions, such as ferroptosis.³⁵ Cellular iron homeostasis needs to be tightly regulated by balancing its uptake, transport, and storage. Intracellular iron deficiency can lead to insufficient energy production, whereas iron overload triggers ROS formation via the Fenton reaction, which begins with the oxidation of the ferrous ion (Fe²⁺) to the ferric ion (Fe³⁺) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, which acts as an oxidizing agent (Fe²⁺+ H2O2→Fe³⁺ + •OH + OH⁻).³⁶ Through Fenton reaction, a large number of hydroxyl radicals are produced, triggering a strong oxidative stress reaction, producing a large number of ROS and inducing ferroptosis.³⁷ Thereby, iron is an essential element for ferroptosis, and iron metabolism is a necessary process for ferroptosis.

Lipid Metabolism

Ferroptosis is also driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation.³⁸ Lipid peroxidation refers to the process in which oxidants obtain an unstable hydrogen atom from the diallyl methyl phosphate of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and generates a large number of free radical lipid peroxidation and hydrogen peroxide content.²⁵ The content of intracellular PUFAs determines the degree of lipid peroxidation in cells and its sensitivity to ferroptosis.³⁹ Recent studies have revealed that many factors or signaling molecules participate in the regulation of fatty acid synthesis, such as glutamine (Gln), citrate synthase (CS) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), participating in the regulation of ferroptosis by mediating lipid oxidation.^40–42 However, the exact mechanism of these factors` role in ferroptosis remains unclear and will be an exciting topic for future studies.

So far, many factors participate in the production of lipid peroxides such as Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family 4 (ACSL4), lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3 (LPCAT3), and lipoxygenases (LOXs).⁴³ ACSL4 is a member of the long-chain acyl coenzyme A synthase family (ACSLs), which is a class of essential enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism.⁴⁴ LPCAT3 is a protein that catalyzes the reacylation of lysophospholipids to phospholipids. Li et al revealed that the knockdown of LPCAT3 activity has been shown to increase intracellular lysophospholipid levels and promote very low-density lipoprotein secretion in hepatocytes.⁴⁵ LOXs (the 15-LOX-1 isoform, in particular) have been implicated as a key regulator in ferroptotic cell death.^46,47 Depending on cellular contexts, ACSL4 and LPCAT3 activate free long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, promote the conversion of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) into lecithin, and participate in the synthesis of phospholipid of oxidized cell membrane, thus mediating the fereoptosis process. On the other hand, ACSL4 esterify mainly arachidonic acid (AA) into acyl-CoA, for biosynthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids required for fatty acid oxidation and ferroptosis.⁴⁸ The absence of CoA leads to a decrease in lipid peroxidation substrates, which declines the level of ferroptosis. Yang et al have demonstrated that cells are resistant to ferroptosis when LOXs activities are knocked down by small interfering RNA (siRNA).⁴⁷ LOXs are not only essential for the execution of ferroptosis but may also play a key role in its initiation by contributing to the lipid hydroperoxides, which promote lipid autoxidation.⁴⁹

The Role of Ferroptosis in Lung Cancer

Based on the theories above, ferroptosis is a form of iron-dependent cell death characterized by the accumulation of lipid peroxides, and it plays a dual role in tumor occurrence. Generally speaking, many drugs can induce ferroptosis to suppress lung cancer cell growth by causing cysteine depletion or by inactivating GPXs. Additionally, ferroptosis could evoke immunosuppression to promote tumor growth of NSCLC by mediating the inflammatory responses.⁵⁰ Herein, combining ferroptosis inhibitors with immunotherapy may be a novel strategy for lung cancer therapy.

Ferroptosis and the Development of Lung Cancer

Iron Ion

Epidemiological and laboratory findings confirmed that iron intake is associated with the development of lung cancer. In a previous prospective population-based cohort study using the Rotterdam dataset, researchers found that dietary higher intake of iron was associated with a decreased risk of lung cancer after adjusting for potential variables.⁵¹ These findings are in agreement with the results from another prospective, National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study with 7052 lung cancer cases, which showed that a higher intake of dietary iron was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lung cancer (13%) after mean follow-up of 7 years.⁵² A risk reduction ranging from 19% to 34% for total iron intake was found in a case–control study with 1139 cases and people with low Fe⁺² suboptimal DNA repair capacity (DRC) may have approximately two-fold risk for lung cancer compared with those with high Fe⁺² proficient DRC.⁵³ In a Massachusetts hospital-based case–control study involving 923 cases and 1125 healthy controls, dietary iron intake may play an important role in the development of lung cancer, whereas heme iron was associated with a decreased risk.⁵⁴ Mechanically, minerals including iron are essential dietary intakes for maintaining the integrity of DNA by preventing oxidative DNA damage.⁵⁵ Moreover, iron deficiency or overload may lead to oxidative DNA damage,⁵⁶ which can further predispose to cancer development.⁵⁷ Similar findings from epidemiological evidence have shown that DNA repair capacity is associated with increased lung cancer risk.^58,59 Previous laboratory data have identified excessive iron can induce apoptosis, necrosis and ferroptosis. Erastin, first discovered as an inducer of ferroptosis, promotes iron-dependent cell death accompanied by antioxidant depletion caused by cystine glutamate antiporter inhibition.⁶⁰ In BALB/c (nu/nu) mice model of lung cancer, overexpression of transferrin receptor 1 (TFR-1) can accelerate the iron absorption rate of lung cancer cells, promote tumor growth, and shorten the mice survival time.⁶¹ Moreover, heat shock protein B 1 (HSPB1) is a negative regulator of ferroptosis as it inhibits the accumulation of iron by inhibiting TFR1 expression.⁶² Noteworthy, although iron can catalyze the production of ROS through Fenton reaction and modulate ferroptosis, its underlying mechanism for lung cancer is still unknown. Following the publication of the above paper, there is no report on whether and how normal cells also rely on iron to cause death, or whether their changes are significantly different from lung cancer cells.

SLC7A11

SLC7A11, as a potential biologic marker, is highly expressive in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).⁶³ SLC7A11 can promote metastasis as well as proliferation of lung cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, and down-regulating SLC7A11 can inhibit metastasis as well as proliferation of lung cancer cells.^64,65 Furthermore, SLC7A11 overexpression could restore the REDOX homeostasis under stress by mediating cystine uptake, reducing ROS production and promoting the proliferation and migration abilities of human lung adenocarcinoma (A549).⁶⁶ On the contrary, down-regulation of SLC7A11 gene expression by siRNA can induce ROS accumulation, and contribute to ferroptotic cell death and inhibit A549 cell proliferation.⁶⁷ In patients with The Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), SLC7A11 was overexpressed and positively related to the progression of tumor progression. Correspondingly, a potent SLC7A11 inhibitor, HG106, markedly decreased cystine uptake and intracellular glutathione biosynthesis. Furthermore, inhibiting SLC7A11 expression by HG106 can reduce intracellular cystine uptake, inhibit intracellular GSH biosynthesis, and, thus, significantly inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in vitro, prolong the survival time of mice with lung cancer, and exhibit selective cytotoxicity toward KRAS-mutant cells by increasing oxidative stress-mediated cell apoptosis in vivo.⁶⁸ Overall, these findings reveal that KRAS-mutant LUAD cells are sensitive to SLC7A11 inhibition, bringing potential therapeutic approaches for this currently incurable disease.

The Family of Glutathione Peroxidase

The family of GPXs, as an antioxidant enzyme in human tissues, has been identified to play an important role in the development of cancers. Lung cancer cell lines also showed high expression of GPXs, such as GPX8 and GPX4. Clinically, GPX8 expression in NSCLC samples was statistically much higher than that in the non-tumorous tissues. The high expression of GPX8 is correlated with the worse clinical prognosis of NSCLC patients. Mechanically, these effects may be due to GPX8 inhibiting the apoptosis of tumor cells and promoting its migration and invasion.⁶⁹ Recently, Wang and co-researchers found that the promoter region of GPX4 could be bound by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element‑binding (CREB) protein, and this binding could be enhanced by E1A binding protein P300 (EP300). Furthermore, CREB, GPX4, EP300 and 4-Hydroxynonenal (4‑HNE) were closely related to cancer development, such as proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. Hence, targeting this CREB/EP300/GPX4/4-HNE pathway may provide a new strategy for treating LUAD.⁷⁰ Additionally, the overexpression of GPX4 can promote the proliferation of the lung cancer cell and resist ferroptosis, whereas RSL3 inhibits the activity of GPX4 and limits proliferation, migration, and invasion of A549 cells.⁷¹ Notably, ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) which is an inhibitor of ferroptosis, can reverse the above phenomenon.⁷² This means that inhibiting GPX4 can induce ferroptosis of lung cancer cell, and it may be a new therapeutic regimen under investigation that would benefit patients with lung cancer.

Ferroptosis Suppressor Protein 1

Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) is a ferroptosis inhibitor, which is independent of classical GPX4 signaling pathway and can suppress ferroptosis by ubiquinone (also known as coenzyme Q10, CoQ10).²² After down-regulating GPX4 gene expression, FSP1 is decorated with cardamom acylation, by regulating NAD(P)H to reduce CoQ10, generating lipophilic free radicals to capture free antioxidants (radical-trapping antioxidant, RTA) to prevent lipid peroxidation, so as to inhibit ferroptosis.²² FSP1 expression led to a higher degree of resistance in lung cancer cells. On the contrary, FSP1 inhibitor (iFSP1) can reverse ferroptosis’ resistance caused by FSP1, increase the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to ferroptosis, and promote ferroptosis in lung cancer cells.²² At present, the research on FSP1 is still in the embryonic stage, and further research is needed.

Ferroptosis and p53 in Lung Cancer

Recently, emerging evidence suggests that p53 could induce ferroptosis. Meng et al revealed that levobupivacaine, a widely used local anesthetic, could inhibit the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of NSCLC cells. Moreover, the medication of levobupivacaine enhanced the erastin-induced inhibition of proliferation of NSCLC cells. Mechanically, the medication of levobupivacaine could promote the levels of ROS, iron, and Fe²⁺ in NSCLC cells and induce ferroptosis by regulating p53 expression in NSCLC cells. Similar results were also found in vivo, where the treatment of levobupivacaine significantly repressed the tumor growth of NSCLC cells.⁷³

Ferroptosis in EGFR-Activating Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

The discovery of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and the development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of lung cancer.⁷⁴ Currently, emerging evidence suggests that ferroptosis can be therapeutically exploited for the treatment of solid tumors and ferroptosis-inducing therapy shows promise in EGFR-activating mutant lung cancer cells that display intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI.⁷⁵

Ferroptosis and Drug Resistance of Lung Cancer

Cisplatin (DDP) elevates the activities of malondialdehyde (MDA) as well as ROS, promotes the expression of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO-1), and also induces ferroptosis of lung cancer cells by regulating lipid peroxidation.^76–78 Activation of Nrf2/xCT pathway is one of the main mechanisms of Cisplatin resistance in NSCLC cells.⁷⁹ Both erastin and sorafenib significantly induce ferroptosis and decrease cell activity, and enhance the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to DDP by inhibiting the expression of xCT, and Nrf2 downstream targets.⁷⁹ In contrast, the overexpression of SLC7A11 can enhance DDP resistance in lung cancer cells.^66,80 The expression of SLC7A11 was associated with the efficacy of many candidate anticancer drugs, of which SLC7A11 was positively correlated with the efficacy of 39 drugs and negatively correlated with the efficacy of 296 drugs, suggesting that SLC7A11 could be used as a predictor factor of GSH-mediated anticancer drug resistance to predict the sensitivity of various chemical drugs.⁸¹

Ferroptosis and Radiation Resistance

Under harsh environmental conditions such as ionizing radiation (IR), it induces not only ROS but also the expression of ACSL4 in NSCLC cells, resulting in elevated lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis.⁸² Additionally, IR also induces the expression of ferroptosis inhibitors such as SLC7A11 and GPX4, as an adaptive response. Interestingly, IR deficiency-induced SLC7A11 expression activates the radioresistance by inhibiting ferroptosis.⁸² Inactivating SLC7A11 or GPX4 with ferroptosis inducers (FINs) sensitizes radioresistant H460, A549, and H1299 cell lines and xenograft tumors to IR. Furthermore, radiotherapy induces ferroptosis in cancer patients, and increased ferroptosis correlates with better response and longer survival to radiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients.⁸² There is a previously unrecognized link between IR and ferroptosis, which indicates that further exploration of the combination of radiotherapy and FINs in cancer treatment is warranted.

Ferroptosis and Potentiate the Effects of Immunotherapy

T cell mediated cellular immunity plays a key role in the development of tumor. In the process of immunotherapy, activated CD8(+) effector T-cells can enhance the specific lipid peroxidation of ferroptosis in tumor cells.⁸³ Otherwise, the activation of ferroptosis may help to the anti-tumor effect of immunotherapy. CD8(+) effector T-cells release IFN-γ under expression, inhibit cystine uptake, and promote lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis.^83,84

Exhaustion of intracellular cystine or blocking of anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint significantly enhanced T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity and induced the ferroptosis of tumor cell.⁸⁵ At the same time, clinical data showed that among patients with melanin, the expression of cystine associated transporters SLC7A11 and SLC3A2 was negatively correlated with the number of CD8+T cells, IFN-γ expression level and patient prognosis.⁸⁶ Despite recently targeting lung cancer, the relationship between T cell and ferroptosis is uncertain. However, it is not difficult to find that T cell promotes the ferroptosis of lung cancer cell is a potential treatment and can enhance the treatment efficiency of immunotherapy. Thereby, it is inevitable that continuing research in this field will further elucidate the physiological and pathological roles of ferroptosis, leading to the development of translational anticancer strategies. Research into biomarkers to precisely trace ferroptosis in patients with cancer, and the development and subsequent application of novel ferroptosis-based therapies will be of critical importance in the next few years.

Targeting Ferroptosis Inducers for Lung Cancer Therapy

Emerging findings reveal the crucial contribution of ferroptosis as a potential target for lung cancer therapy and ferroptosis inducers including small molecules and nanomaterials have been developed.⁸⁷ Nanotechnology applications have attracted much attention with specific physicochemical properties recently, and the detailed information on those previously reported nanoparticles is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Nanoparticle Inducers in Ferroptosis for Lung Cancer

Most nanomaterials such as iron-based nanoparticles are based on Fenton reaction. In order to open up a new avenue for developing multifunctional advanced new materials for cancer therapy, Yao et al prepared a tumor-targeted nanoparticle named FeCO-DOX@MCN (a multifunctional CO/thermo/chemotherapy) nanoplatform targeting near-infrared (NIR) light and convert it into ample heat to trigger CO release and could also release doxorubicin (DOX) in the acidic tumor microenvironment. Its mechanisms on anti-cancer included iron loading, ROS level increase, GSH depletion, and GPX4 inactivation. In addition, the generated CO molecules successfully increased tumor sensitivity to chemotherapeutics through the ferroptosis pathway. It is worth noticing that under the guidance of photoacoustic imaging, the FeCO-DOX@MCN nanoplatform demonstrates high efficacy both in vitro and in vivo through a combination of chemotherapy, photothermal therapy and gas therapy. This multifunctional platform with excellent antitumor efficacy has great potential in precision cancer therapy.⁸⁸

Conclusions and Perspectives

Ferroptosis, as a newly discovered form of cell death, has a unique advantage and large potential in the treatment of tumor. The sensitivity of many aggressive and drug-resistant cancer cells to ferroptosis and the FDA approval of altretamine, sorafenib and silica nanoparticles as ferroptosis inducers for tumor therapy have generated high expectations in the treatment of ferroptosis. Although the research on ferroptosis has made great progress in recent years, there are still some problems to be solved, such as the particularity of ROS in ferroptosis and the specific role of ferroptosis in immunotherapy. In addition, there were significant differences in the sensitivity of cells to ferroptosis among different tissues, and there were also significant differences among individuals in the sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers, such as erastin and sorafenib. Therefore, it is of great significance to find biological indicators that can reflect the sensitivity of cells and individuals to ferroptosis and to discover new ferroptosis inducers for improving the understanding of ferroptosis-related diseases and the diagnosis and treatment level of lung cancer. Ferroptosis will become a new strategy for cancer treatment, breaking the current dilemma of lung cancer treatment and bringing benefits to lung cancer patients.