We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
BenchmarksOpen Accesscc iconby icon

Whole-mount BrdU staining of proliferating cells by DNase treatment: application to postnatal mammalian retina

    Andrei V. Tkatchenko

    *Address correspondence to Andrei V. Tkatchenko, Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. e-mail:

    E-mail Address: andrei_tkatchenko@hms.harvard.edu

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2144/000112094

    Cell proliferation plays an important role in embryonic development, tissue repair, tissue homeostasis, and various pathological processes. Several markers have been introduced over the years that allow for direct or indirect analysis of proliferation (1–4). Tritiated thymidine ([3H]-T) was first used by Taylor (1) to analyze DNA replication and later became a popular marker for the identification of dividing cells. [3H]-T incorporates into newly synthesized DNA during the S-phase of the cell cycle and, therefore, allows direct analysis of proliferation. However, technical difficulties associated with the detection of this thymidine analog led to the development of new nonra-dioactive nitrogen base analogs such as 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU), which also incorporates into newly synthesized DNA during S-phase, but, unlike [3H]-T, BrdU can be detected by immunohistochemical techniques (4–8). The development of highly specific antibodies to BrdU (5,6,9,10) made it the most popular marker currently used to detect cell proliferation.

    For proper detection, the labeled DNA must first be denatured. Most commonly used protocols for visualization of BrdU-labeled cells on tissue sections utilize incubation in 2 M HCl for that purpose (4). Hydrochloric acid causes denaturation, dissolution, deamidation, and degradation of the majority of proteins, which has a profound damaging effect on the specimen, resulting in poor morphology and often precluding co-staining for other antigens due to disruption of the epitopes for commonly used antibodies. To avoid problems associated with HCl treatment, the use of microwave irradiation, which removes proteins and allows for better physical access of the antibody to the labeled DNA, was suggested (8). However, microwave irradiation alone, without DNA denaturation, was found to result in a lower percentage of BrdU-positive cells and had to be combined with HCl treatment for quantitative assessment of proliferation (11). Gonchoroff et al. (6) demonstrated that DNase I pretreatment can be used to quantitatively expose BrdU-labeled epitopes in cell suspensions. We have also successfully used DNase I treatment to stain BrdU-positive nuclei on tissue sections (12).

    Initially, mitotic cells in whole-mount preparations were recognized by the characteristic shape formed by the mitotic chromosomes stained with cresyl violet (13). [3H]-T was also historically used to visualize proliferating cells in retinal whole mounts (14). The only protocol currently used to visualize BrdU-labeled cells in whole mounts is a replica of the procedure used to visualize BrdU-labeled cells on tissue sections and utilizes HCl treatment to expose BrdU-labeled epitopes (15–17). The method has all the disadvantages associated with tissue exposure to HCl and is characterized by poor penetration of antibodies into the deep cell layers of the specimen, which precludes quantitative analysis of proliferation.

    Here I describe a reliable and highly efficient procedure for the visualization of BrdU-labeled nuclei in whole mounts using DNase I treatment for exposing BrdU-labeled epitomes. We used this protocol to study cell proliferation in the postnatal primate retina.

    Five 4-month-old green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) received a single intravenous infusion of BrdU (10 mg/mL in 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.4; 125 mg/kg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) over a period of 1.5 h. Following the BrdU infusion, the monkeys were sacrificed and their eyes were enucleated. After eye enucleation, the retinas were separated from the pigment epithelium, fixed with 2% formaldehyde in 0.15 M Sörensen phosphate buffer overnight, and cut into four quadrants, which were stained as whole mounts (18).

    Protocol 1 describes specific concentrations and the timing of each step of the procedure. The quadrants of the neural retina were sealed between two sheets of nylon mesh to stabilize the tissue and provide equal access of the reagents to all portions of the specimen. This needs to be done in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to avoid drying the tissue. Specimens were bleached with 6% H2O2 and incubated with 5 µg/mL proteinase K. Limited digest with proteinase K results in partial disruption of the limiting membranes surrounding the retina and facilitates penetration of the anti-BrdU antibodies and avidin-horse-radish-peroxidase (HRP) complex into the deep layers of the retina. Proteinase K was then deactivated by incubation with glycine and postfixing with 0.2% glutaraldehyde/4% formaldehyde in PBS.

    Protocol 1. Whole-Mount Retina Staining for BrdU

    To expose the BrdU-labeled DNA epitopes, we used a limited digest of the nuclear DNA with DNase I. The timing of DNase I treatment needs to be carefully optimized for different tissues because overdigestion or under-digestion leads to a reduced staining intensity. We found that 2 h incubation at 37°C was optimal for the retina. DNase I was subsequently inactivated by 10 min incubation at 70°C in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. This short incubation at 70°C does not result in protein denaturation and does not have a detrimental effect on epitope integrity. After overnight incubation in blocking solution, the retinas were incubated overnight with biotin-conjugated anti-BrdU mouse monoclonal antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). This antibody bound to BrdU-labeled DNA was detected using an immuno-peroxidase detection system (19), the VECTASTAIN® Elite ABC Reagent (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), which allows significant signal amplification while maintaining a very low background. A variety of chromogens can be used to localize peroxidase activity in the tissue. We used the traditional substrate 3,3′-diami-nobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB), which produces a brown precipitate. To further enhance the staining, we used CoCl2, which modifies the precipitate and produces an intense dark-brown color. The tissue has to be preincubated with CoCl2 prior to exposure to the DAB solution because CoCl2 forms an insoluble precipitate in cacodylate buffer. The resulting dark-brown precipitate is insoluble in alcohol and clearing agents, allowing specimens to be permanently mounted in Permount (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA).

    We successfully used this protocol to study cell proliferation in the postnatal primate retina (Figure 1). A uniform staining was routinely obtained throughout the surface (Figure 1, A and B) and the thickness (Figure 1, C and D) of the retina, allowing quantitative analysis of proliferation in different regions. The procedure utilizes a limited digest with DNase I to expose BrdU-labeled epitopes, which, unlike HCl treatment, does not have detrimental effects on the epitope integrity and makes it very easy to combine BrdU staining with immuno-histochemical detection of any other antigen (Figure 1E). The retinal whole mount is approximately 250 µm thick. Therefore, this protocol can be easily optimized for studies of proliferation during early embryonic development as well as for the analysis of proliferation in other adult tissues, given that thick vibratome slices are used as a starting material. The only parameter that would need to be optimized is the duration of a DNase I digest, which can be easily done by performing a time-course experiment. Our protocol represents a valuable tool and a platform that can be further optimized for studies of proliferation in various biological systems.

    Figure 1. Proliferating cells of the postnatal primate retina.

    (A–D) Cell nuclei labeled with a single infusion of BrdU were visualized in retinal whole mounts using our protocol (dark brown). A uniform staining was obtained in both (A) peripheral and (B) central retina, where a majority of proliferating cells are found. The proliferating cells located in different cell layers of the retina were also uniformly stained. (C) BrdU-positive cells located in the INL, OPL, and ONL peripheral retina. (D) BrdU-positive cells in the GCL peripheral retina. (E) Proliferating cells at the peripheral retina were co-stained with antibody to nestin (1:500; BD Biosciences Transduction Laboratories, Mountain View, CA, USA) and 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). BrdU, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 20 µm.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank D. Eugene Redmond and the staff of the St. Kitts Biomedical Research Foundation for invaluable help; Elio Raviolafor help with micros-copy and helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from the Ilfeld Macular Degeneration Fund and the Edward R. and Anne G. Lefler Center at Harvard Medical School. A.V.T. was the recipient of a Dana Mahoney Neuroscience Fellowship Award.

    Competing Interests Statement

    The author declares no competing interests

    References

    • 1. Taylor, J.H. 1953. Intracellular localization of labeled nucleic acid determined by autora- diographs. Science 118:555–557.
    • 2. Bravo, R., R. Frank, P.A. Blundell, and H. Macdonald-Bravo. 1987. Cyclin/PCNA is the auxiliary protein of DNA polymerase- delta. Nature 326:515–517.
    • 3. Prelich, G., C.K. Tan, M. Kostura, M.B. Mathews, A.G. So, K.M. Downey, and B. Stillman. 1987. Functional identity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and a DNA polymerase-delta auxiliary protein. Nature 326:517–520.
    • 4. Dolbeare, F. 1995. Bromodeoxyuridine: a diagnostic tool in biology and medicine, Part I: historical perspectives, histochemical methods and cell kinetics. Histochem. J. 27:339–369.
    • 5. Gratzner, H.G. 1982. Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine: a new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 218:474–475.
    • 6. Gonchoroff, N.J., J.A. Katzmann, R.M. Currie, E.L. Evans, D.W. Houck, B.C. Kline, P.R. Greipp, and M.R. Loken. 1986. S-phase detection with an antibody to bromodeoxyuridine. Role of DNase pretreatment. J. Immunol. Methods 93:97–101.
    • 7. Nowakowski, R.S., S.B. Lewin, and M.W. Miller. 1989. Bromodeoxyuridine immuno-histochemical determination of the lengths of the cell cycle and the DNA-synthetic phase for an anatomically defined population. J. Neurocytol. 18:311–318.
    • 8. Dover, R. and K. Patel. 1994. Improved methodology for detecting bromodeoxyuridine in cultured cells and tissue sections by immunocytochemistry. Histochemistry 102:383–387.
    • 9. Traincard, F., T. Ternynck, A. Danchin, and S. Avrameas. 1983. An immunoenzyme technic for demonstrating the molecular hybridization of nucleic acids]. Ann. Immunol. Paris 134D:399–404.
    • 10. Magaud, J.P., I. Sargent, and D.Y. Mason. 1988. Detection of human white cell prolif-erative responses by immunoenzymatic measurement of bromodeoxyuridine uptake. J. Immunol. Methods 106:95–100.
    • 11. Kass, L., J. Varayoud, H. Ortega, M. Munoz de Toro, and E.H. Luque. 2000. Detection of bromodeoxyuridine in formalin-fixed tissue. DNA denaturation following microwave or enzymatic digestion pretreatment is required. Eur. J. Histochem. 44:185–191.
    • 12. Tkatchenko, A.V., R.P. Visconti, L. Shang, T. Papenbrock, N.D. Pruett, T. Ito, M. Ogawa, and A. Awgulewitsch. 2001. Overexpression of Hoxc13 in differentiating keratinocytes results in downregulation of a novel hair keratin gene cluster and alopecia. Development 128:1547–1558.
    • 13. Rapaport, D.H. and J. Stone. 1983. The topography of cytogenesis in the developing retina of the cat. J. Neurosci. 3:1824–1834.
    • 14. Walsh, C. and E.H. Polley. 1985. The topography of ganglion cell production in the cat's retina. J. Neurosci. 5:741–750.
    • 15. Cameron, D.A. and S.S. Easter. 1995. Cone photoreceptor regeneration in adult fish retina: phenotypic determination and mosaic pattern formation. J. Neurosci. 15:2255–2271.
    • 16. Zygar, C.A., M.J. Lee, and R.D. Fernald. 1999. Nasotemporal asymmetry during teleost retinal growth: preserving an area of specialization. J. Neurobiol. 41:435–442.
    • 17. Tyler, M.J., L.H. Carney, and D.A. Cameron. 2005. Control of cellular pattern formation in the vertebrate inner retina by homotypic regulation of cell-fate decisions. J. Neurosci. 25:4565–4576.
    • 18. Chan-Ling, T. 1997. Glial, vascular, and neuronal cytogenesis in whole-mounted cat retina. Microsc. Res. Tech. 36:1–16.
    • 19. Hsu, S.M., L. Raine, and H. Fanger. 1981. The use of antiavidin antibody and avidin-bio-tin-peroxidase complex in immunoperoxidase technics. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 75:816–821.