Coercing Compliance: The Enforcement Conundrums of the Formal Sources of International and Constitutional Public Law

36 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2023

See all articles by Mischa Gureghian-Hall

Mischa Gureghian-Hall

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Date Written: December 10, 2022

Abstract

One of the international law's most frequent critiques relates to its apparent unenforceability, a weakness commonly attributed to the absence of a central world government with the ability to exact coercive force against transgressors of inter-State obligations. Yet, as this article aims to demonstrate, the challenge of law whose subjects bend to no legal authority is one of equal theoretical relevance in domestic constitutional systems. Highlighting this oft-overlooked parallelism, this paper draws on 20th-century positivist thought to frame international law's shortcomings, not through the lens of a Hartian rule of recognition but rather through a problem confined to le domaine politique. Arguing for a reconceptualization of public international law, this paper seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the formal sources of the law of nations.

Keywords: International law, constitutional law, sources of law, comparative law, Grundnorm

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Gureghian-Hall, Mischa, Coercing Compliance: The Enforcement Conundrums of the Formal Sources of International and Constitutional Public Law (December 10, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4332194 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4332194

Mischa Gureghian-Hall (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

Los Angeles, CA
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
298
Rank
598,940
PlumX Metrics