How Strength Asymmetries Shape Multi-Sided Conflicts

37 Pages Posted: 7 May 2022

See all articles by Sebastian Cortes-Corrales

Sebastian Cortes-Corrales

Chapman University

Paul M. Gorny

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Management

Abstract

Governments and multilateral organisations often attempt to contain or end multisided violent conflicts by supporting one of the conflicting parties. We investigate the (intended and unintended) consequences of strengthening an agent in a multisided conflict. Using a weighted conflict network based on Franke and Öztürk (2015), we study how changing the strength of otherwise symmetric agents creates knock-on effects throughout the network. Increasing an agent’s strength induces a relocation of conflict investments: distant conflicts are carried out more fiercely. In line with previous results, asymmetry reduces aggregate conflict investments. In the case of bipartite networks, with two conflicting coalitions, agents in the coalition of the (now) strong agent face more intense conflicts.

Keywords: Conflicts, Network Games, Asymmetric Agents

Suggested Citation

Cortes-Corrales, Sebastian and Gorny, Paul M., How Strength Asymmetries Shape Multi-Sided Conflicts. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4103411 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4103411

Sebastian Cortes-Corrales (Contact Author)

Chapman University ( email )

1 University Drive
Orange, CA 92866
United States

Paul M. Gorny

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Management ( email )

Kaiserstr. 89
Karlsruhe, Baden Württemberg 76133
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
269
PlumX Metrics