Download This PaperKitchen versus Herbert
17 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2015
Date Written: February 10, 2014
Abstract
The court does not need to impugn the motives of voters to resolve the question of the constitutionality of Utah's marriage amendment. Charging voters with bias will unnecessarily marginalize those who disagree and chill public debate.
Keywords: court, motives, animus, voters, constitutionality, marriage amendment, bias, marginalize, chill, public debate
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Scharffs, Brett G., Kitchen versus Herbert (February 10, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2614116 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614116
Brett G. Scharffs (Contact Author)
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )
430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.