On the Effects of Deposit Insurance and Observability on Bank Runs: An Experimental Study
19 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2013
Date Written: February 1, 2011
Abstract
We study the effects of deposit insurance and observability of previous actions on the emergence of bank runs by means of a controlled laboratory experiment. We consider three depositors in the line of a common bank. Depositors decide in sequence between withdrawing or keeping their money deposited. We have three different treatments in which depositors who keep the money have full insurance, are partially insured, or not insured at all in case of a bank run. We find that different levels of deposit insurance and the possibility of observing other depositor's actions reduce the likelihood of bank runs. The effect of these variables is not independent. Our data suggest that optimal deposit insurance should take into account the degree of observability: full and partial insurance are equally effective when decisions are observable, whereas full insurance is more likely to prevent bank runs when depositors do not observe other depositors' decisions.
Keywords: deposit insurance, observability, bank runs, experimental economics
JEL Classification: G21, C90
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
On the Dynamics and Severity of Bank Runs: An Experimental Study
By Andrew Schotter and Tanju Yorulmazer
-
By Ernst Fehr and Christian Zehnder
-
Strategic Loan Defaults and Coordination: An Experimental Analysis
By Stefan T. Trautmann and Razvan Vlahu
-
Strategic Loan Defaults and Coordination: An Experimental Analysis
By Stefan T. Trautmann and Razvan Vlahu
-
Strategic Loan Defaults and Coordination: An Experimental Analysis
By Stefan T. Trautmann and Razvan Vlahu
-
Do Social Networks Prevent Bank Runs?
By Hubert Janos Kiss, Ismael Rodriguez-lara, ...
-
Contagious Bank Runs: Experimental Evidence
By Martin Brown, Stefan T. Trautmann, ...