An Incomplete Contracts Perspective on the Provision and Pricing of Excludable Public Goods
43 Pages Posted: 7 Jan 2010 Last revised: 26 Apr 2010
Date Written: April 2010
Abstract
We study whether a firm that produces and sells access to an excludable public good should face a self-financing requirement, or, alternatively, receive subsidies that help to cover the cost of public-goods provision. The main result is that the desirability of a self-financing requirement is shaped by an equity-efficiency trade-off: While first-best efficiency is out of reach with such a requirement, its imposition limits the firm's ability of rent extraction. Hence, consumer surplus may be higher if the firm has no access to public funds.
Keywords: Incomplete Contracts, Excludable Public Goods, Regulation
JEL Classification: D82, D86, H41, L51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Efficient Mechanisms for Public Goods with Use Exclusions
By Peter Norman
-
An Efficiency Rationale for Bundling of Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Monopolistic Provision of Excludable Public Goods Under Private Information
-
Toward an Efficiency Rationale for the Public Provision of Private Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Portfolio Diversification and Value at Risk Under Thick-Tailedness
-
Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
The Provision and Pricing of Excludable Public Goods: Ramsey-Boiteux Pricing Versus Bundling
-
A Note on Budget Balance Under Interim Participation Constraints: The Case of Independent Types
By Tilman Borgers and Peter Norman