Download This PaperMeasuring Access to Justice: The Quality of Outcomes
Tilburg University Legal Studies Working Paper No. 014/2008
TISCO Working Paper No. 007/2008
22 Pages Posted: 14 Nov 2008 Last revised: 23 Dec 2012
Date Written: November 10, 2008
Abstract
In this paper, we present a shortlist of criteria and questionnaire items that can be used to evaluate the quality of outcomes of legal procedures and other paths to justice. We define a path to justice as a commonly applied process that users address in order to cope with a legal problem. In our analysis such a path to justice begins when the user first addresses the process and ends at the moment of an outcome. This can be a final decision by a neutral, a joint agreement by the parties, or an end to the process because one of the parties quits the process. Our measurement instrument aims to assess the quality of this outcome from the perspective of the persons using paths to justice.
Criteria only are put on our shortlist if (a) they are regularly proposed in theoretical (normative) literature and (b) empirical research confirms that a substantial part of the population actually uses them to evaluate the outcomes of processes that give access to justice. We draw the criteria for our shortlist from the literature on theories of justice as diverse as distributive justice, restorative justice, corrective justice, retributive justice, transformative justice, legal pragmatism, and formal justice. The proposed criteria and items are intended to become part of a methodology for measuring the price and quality of access to justice from a user's perspective. The paper ends with a discussion of some of the (methodological) challenges: the problems associated with neutral evaluations of outcomes, the ambiguity of outcomes, and the relative weight of each criterion in different settings.
Keywords: Access to Justice, Outcome, Justice, Fairness, Quality, Dispute Resolution, Path to Justice
JEL Classification: D63, D73, D74, K40, K41, K42, O17
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tilburg University - Faculty of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 90153
NL-5000 LE Tilburg
Netherlands
0031134668764 (Phone)
0031134662323 (Fax)
Harvard Law School (Program on Negotiation) ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
UC Law, San Francisco ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/kamminga/index.html
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
How to Measure the Price and Quality of Access to Justice?
By Maurits Barendrecht, José Mulder, ...
-
Access to Justice: The Quality of the Procedure
By Laura Klaming and Ivo Giesen
-
Measuring the Costs and Quality of Paths to Justice: Contours of a Methodology
By Martin Gramatikov, Maurits Barendrecht, ...
-
Methodological Challenges in Measuring Cost and Quality of Access to Justice
-
Access to Justice, Costs, and Legal Aid
By James George
-
Institutionalizing Access-to-Justice: Judicial, Legislative and Grassroots Dimensions
-
Weighting Justice: Constructing an Index of Access to Justice
-
Online Integrative Negotiation Tools for the Dutch Council for Legal Aid
-
From :-( to :-) Using Online Communication to Improve Dispute Resolution