Skip to main content
Log in

NHS-based Tandem Mass Tagging of Proteins at the Level of Whole Cells: A Critical Evaluation in Comparison to Conventional TMT-Labeling Approaches for Quantitative Proteome Analysis

  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tandem mass tags (TMT) are usually introduced at the levels of isolated proteins or peptides. Here, for the first time, we report the labeling of whole cells and a critical evaluation of its performance in comparison to conventional labeling approaches. The obtained results indicated that TMT protein labeling using intact cells is generally possible, if it is coupled to a subsequent enrichment using anti-TMT antibody. The quantitative results were similar to those obtained after labeling of isolated proteins and both were found to be slightly complementary to peptide labeling. Furthermore, when using NHS-based TMT, no specificity towards cell surface proteins was observed in the case of cell labeling. In summary, the conducted study revealed first evidence for the general possibility of TMT cell labeling and highlighted limitations of NHS-based labeling reagents. Future studies should therefore focus on the synthesis and investigation of membrane impermeable TMTs to increase specificity towards cell surface proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.A. Megger, T. Bracht, H.E. Meyer, B. Sitek, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2013, 1834, 1581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Rauniyar and J.R. Yates, J. Proteome Res., 2014, 13, 5293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bantscheff, S. Lemeer, M.M. Savitski, B. Kuster, Anal. Bioanal Chem., 2012, 404, 939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M.D. Filiou, D. Martins-de-Souza, P.C. Guest, S. Bahn, C.W. Turck, Proteomics, 2012, 12, 736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D.A. Megger, W. Naboulsi, H.E. Meyer, B. Sitek, J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol., 2014, 2, 23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. S.A. Singh, E. Aikawa, M. Aikawa, Circ. J., 2016, 80, 1674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Chahrour, D. Cobice, J. Malone, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2015, 113, 2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. P.L. Ross, Y.N. Huang, J.N. Marchese, B. Williamson, K. Parker, S. Hattan, N. Khainovski, S. Pillai, S. Dey, S. Daniels, S. Purkayastha, P. Juhasz, S. Martin, M. Bartlet-Jones, F. He, A. Jacobson, D.J. Pappin, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2004, 3, 1154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Dayon, A. Hainard, V. Licker, N. Turck, K. Kuhn, D.F. Hochstrasser, P.R. Burkhard, J.C. Sanchez, Anal. Chem., 2008, 80, 2921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F.K. Huang, G. Zhang, K. Lawlor, A. Nazarian, J. Philip, P. Tempst, N. Dephoure, T.A. Neubert, J. Proteome Res., 2017, 16, 1121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. D.A. Megger, L.L. Pott, M. Ahrens, J. Padden, T. Bracht, K. Kuhlmann, M. Eisenacher, H.E. Meyer, B. Sitek, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2014, 1844, 967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D.A. Megger, K. Rosowski, M. Ahrens, T. Bracht, M. Eisenacher, J.F. Schlaak, F. Weber, A.C. Hoffmann, H.E. Meyer, H.A. Baba, B. Sitek, Biomarkers, 2017, 22, 113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Franken, T. Mathieson, D. Childs, G.M. Sweetman, T. Werner, I. Togel, C. Doce, S. Gade, M. Bantscheff, G. Drewes, F.B. Reinhard, W. Huber, M.M. Savitski, Nat. Protoc., 2015, 10, 1567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. M.P. Weekes, P. Tomasec, E.L. Huttlin, C.A. Fielding, D. Nusinow, R.J. Stanton, E.C. Wang, R. Aicheler, I. Murrell, G.W. Wilkinson, P.J. Lehner, S.P. Gygi, Cell, 2014, 157, 1460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Zhang, H. Jiang, G. Xu, N. Chu, N. Xu, H. Wen, B. Gu, J. Liu, S. Mao, R. Na, Y. Jing, Q. Ding, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, Biosci. Trends, 2016, 10, 210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Kodera, Y. Hido, R. Kato, T. Saito, Y. Kawashima, S. Minamida, K. Matsumoto, M. Iwamura, Mass Spectrom. (Tokyo), 2014, 3, S0044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Tu, S. Zhou, Z. Liu, X. Li, Q. Liu, Circ. J., 2014, 78, 993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Mayrhofer, S. Krieger, G. Allmaier, D. Kerjaschki, Proteomics, 2006, 6, 579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Niehage, J. Karbanova, C. Steenblock, D. Corbeil, B. Hoflack, PLoS One, 2016, 11, e0159824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Strassberger, S. Trussel, T. Fugmann, D. Neri, C. Roesli, Proteomics, 2010, 10, 3544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. C.S. Gan, P.K. Chong, T.K. Pham, P.C. Wright, J. Proteome Res., 2007, 6, 821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Kocher, P. Pichler, M. Schutzbier, C. Stingl, A. Kaul, N. Teucher, G. Hasenfuss, J.M. Penninger, K. Mechtler, J. Proteome Res., 2009, 8, 4743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. S.Y. Ow, M. Salim, J. Noirel, C. Evans, I. Rehman, P.C. Wright, J. Proteome Res., 2009, 8, 5347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Bantscheff, M. Boesche, D. Eberhard, T. Matthieson, G. Sweetman, B. Kuster, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2008, 7, 1702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Elia, Proteomics, 2008, 8, 4012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Roesli, D. Neri, J.N. Rybak, Nat. Protoc., 2006, 1, 192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. M. de Wit, C.R. Jimenez, B. Carvalho, J.A. Belien, P.M. Delis-van Diemen, S. Mongera, S.R. Piersma, M. Vikas, S. Navani, F. Ponten, G.A. Meijer, R.J. Fijneman, Gut, 2012, 61, 855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Nunomura, K. Nagano, C. Itagaki, M. Taoka, N. Okamura, Y. Yamauchi, S. Sugano, N. Takahashi, T. Izumi, T. Isobe, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2005, 4, 1968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik A. Megger.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Megger, D.A., Pott, L.L., Rosowski, K. et al. NHS-based Tandem Mass Tagging of Proteins at the Level of Whole Cells: A Critical Evaluation in Comparison to Conventional TMT-Labeling Approaches for Quantitative Proteome Analysis. ANAL. SCI. 33, 1387–1391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.33.1387

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.33.1387

Keywords

Navigation