Cent Eur J Public Health 2023, 31(1):43-49 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a7284

Assessing the impact of Hungary's public health product tax: an interrupted time series analysis

Tímea Csákvári1, 2, Diána Elmer1, 2, Noémi Németh1, Márk Komáromy1, Réka Mihály-Vajda2, Imre Boncz1, 2
1 Institute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
2 National Laboratory on Human Reproduction, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary

Objectives: Imposing taxes on unhealthy goods can generate income, raise people's health awareness, and eventually decrease the prevalence of chronic diseases. Our aim was to assess the impact of Hungary's public health product tax (PHPT) since its implementation in September 2011. Differences in purchasing habits between households with different income statuses were also compared.

Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of tax bases and income was carried out, and an interrupted time series analysis using the generalised least squares method was performed to examine the changes in trends regarding the purchase of taxable products before and after the implementation of the tax. The amount of tax base (in kilograms or litres), income (in HUF and EUR), and annual purchased quantity of food and beverage groups per household were assessed. Data were derived from the National Tax and Customs Administration of Hungary and the Hungarian Household Budget and Living Conditions Surveys. The study sample was composed of households who participated in the surveys (mean = 8,359, SD = 1,146) between 2006 and 2018.

Results: The households' tax bases and incomes increased constantly (with a few exceptions). The total revenue was 19.49 billion HUF (67.37 million EUR) in 2012 and 59.19 billion HUF (168.55 million EUR) in 2020. However, the households' purchasing habits did not change as expected. A significant short-term decrease (between 2012 and 2013) in purchasing unhealthy goods was observed for three groups: soft drinks (p = 0.009), jams (p = 0.047), and fruit juices (p = 0.038). Only soft drinks showed a significant decreasing trend in the post-intervention period between 2012 and 2018 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: We concluded that the PHPT did not decrease households' unhealthy food purchasing trend, although it has a positive effect as it can create revenue for health care and health-promoting programmes.

Keywords: public health, food and beverages, taxation, Hungary

Received: January 12, 2022; Revised: March 27, 2023; Accepted: March 27, 2023; Published: March 31, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Csákvári T, Elmer D, Németh N, Komáromy M, Mihály-Vajda R, Boncz I. Assessing the impact of Hungary's public health product tax: an interrupted time series analysis. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2023;31(1):43-49. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7284. PubMed PMID: 37086420.
Download citation

References

  1. Fryatt R, Mills A. Taskforce on innovative international financing for health systems: showing the way forward. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(6):476-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Csákvári T, Elmer D, Horváth L, Boncz I. Status of diabetic neuropathy in Korea: a National Health Insurance Service - National Sample Cohort Analysis (2006 to 2015). (Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:115-9). Diabetes Metab J. 2021;45(3):454-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Hagenaars LL, Jeurissen PPT, Klazinga NS. The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): an overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies. Health Policy. 2017;121(8):887-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kukalová G, Moravec L, Bína Filipová D, Kučírková L. Evaluation of estimated direct health expenses on tobacco- and alcohol-related diseases in context of excise taxes revenues in the Czech Republic. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2021;29(2):143-52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Levy DT, Levy J, Mauer-Stender K. Potential impact of strong tobacco-control policies in 11 newly independent states. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2019;27(2):115-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Härkänen T, Kotakorpi K, Pietinen P, Pirtillä J, Reinivuo H, Suoniemi I. The welfare effects of health-based food tax policy. Food Policy. 2014;49 Part 1:196-206. Go to original source...
  7. Taxation, spending, and the social safety net: hidden effects on public health. In: Gostin LO, Wiley LF. Public health law: power, duty, restraint. Oakland: University of California Press; 2016. p. 271-302.
  8. Powell LM, Andreyeva T, Isgor Z. Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue. J Public Health Policy. 2020;41(2):125-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Powell LM, Leider J. Impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax two-year post-tax implementation in Seattle, Washington, United States. J Public Health Policy. 2021;42(4):574-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Clark JS, Dittrich LO, Xu Q. Empirical evidence of the efficiency and efficacy of fat taxes and thin subsidies. Cent Eur J Public Health 2014;22(3):201-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Pfinder M, Heise TL, Hilton Boon M, Pega F, Fenton C, Griebler U, et al. Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):CD012333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012333.pub2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Boer J, Driesenaar J, Blokstra A, Vennemann F, Pushkarev N, Hansen J. Supporting the mid-term evaluation of the EU Action Plan on Childhood Obesity: The Childhood Obesity Study. Brussels: European Commission; 2018
  13. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Csákvári T, Németh N, Kerner Á, Sebestyén A, Endrei D, Boncz I. Assessing the effect of the public health product tax in Hungary between 2011-2017. Value Health. 2018;21 Suppl 2:S52. Go to original source...
  15. Bíró A. Did the junk food tax make the Hungarians eat healthier? Food Policy. 2015;54:107-15. Go to original source...
  16. Boncz I, Evetovits T, Dózsa C, Sebestyén A, Gulácsi L, Ágoston I, et al. The Hungarian care managing organization pilot program. Value Health Reg Issues. 2015;7:27-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Endrei D, Zemplényi A, Molics B, Ágoston I, Boncz I. The effect of performance-volume limit on the DRG based acute care hospital financing in Hungary. Health Policy. 2014;115(2-3):152-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Pakai A, Kívés Z. [Research for nurses part 2: methods of sampling and data collection in health science research]. Nővér. 2013;26(3):20-43. Hungarian.
  19. Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):348-55.
  20. Cornelsen L, Adams J, Gasparrini A, Iskander D, Knai C, Mytton O, et al. Impact of a levy on sales of sugar-sweetened beverages within a national chain of restaurants: interrupted time-series analysis. Lancet. 2016;388 Suppl 2:S15. Go to original source...
  21. Guerrero-López CM, Molina M, Colchero MA. Employment changes associated with the introduction of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and nonessential energy-dense food in Mexico. Prev Med. 2017;105 Suppl:S43-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Cornelsen L, Mytton OT, Adams J, Gasparrini A, Iskander D, Knai C, et al. Change in non-alcoholic beverage sales following a 10-pence levy on sugar-sweetened beverages within a national chain of restaurants in the UK: interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(11):1107-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. Interrupted time series (ITS) analyses. EPOC Resources for review authors [Internet]. EPOC; 2017 [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/interrupted_time_series_analyses.docx.
  24. Bridge G, Lomazzi M, Bedi R. Implementation of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations for policymakers. J Public Health Policy. 2020;41(1):84-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kuchler F, Tegene A, Harris JM. Taxing snack foods: manipulating diet quality or financing information programs? Rev Agric Econ. 2005;27(1):4-20. Go to original source...
  26. Julia C, Méjean C, Vicari F, Péneau S, Hercberg S. Public perception and characteristics related to acceptance of the sugar-sweetened beverage taxation launched in France in 2012. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(14):2679-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Kim KH, Kang E, Yun YH. Public support for health taxes and media regulation of harmful products in South Korea. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7044-2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. World Health Organization. Assessment of the impact of a public health product tax [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016 [cited 2019 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/332882/assessment-impact-PH-tax-report.pdf.
  29. World Health Organization. Public health product tax in Hungary: an example of successful intersectoral action using a fiscal tool to promote healthier food choices and raise revenues for public health [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 11]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/287095/Good-practice-brief-public-health-product-tax-in-hungary.pdf.
  30. Zámbó L, Bakacs M, Illés É, Varga A, Sarkadi Nagy E, Zentai A, et al. Impact assessment of the public health product tax in Hungary. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30 Suppl 5:ckaa166.1231. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1231. Go to original source...