The Far North Act (2010) Consultative Process: A New Beginning or the Reinforcement of an Unacceptable Relationship in Northern Ontario, Canada?

Authors

  • Holly L. Gardner University of Waterloo
  • Stephen R. J. Tsuji University of Waterloo
  • Daniel D. McCarthy University of Waterloo
  • Graham S. Whitelaw Queen's University
  • Leonard J.S. Tsuji University of Waterloo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2012.3.2.7

Abstract

In northern Ontario, Canada, there have been two “negotiated” documents that required consultation between First Nations and the federated government of the land: Treaty No. 9 signed in 1905-1906 (Dominion of Canada, with the concurrence of the Province of Ontario) and Ontario’s Far North Act (2010). Treaty No. 9 has defined the relationship between First Nations and Canada; while, the Far North Act will define the relationship with Ontario. This article evaluated whether the Far North Act marked a new beginning or the reinforcement of an unacceptable relationship, using primary and secondary data analyses. Analyses revealed that the passing of the Far North Act was not a new beginning, but the continuation of an unacceptable relationship.

Downloads

Published

2012-08-09