The cognitive-functional properties of English WH-dialogic constructions in discourse

  • Guocai Zeng College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Sichuan University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/FLS.v1i1.1080
Keywords: WH-dialogic constructions; event; schema-instance principle; cognitive model

Abstract

Within the theoretical frameworks of cognitive linguistics and cognitive construction grammar, this paper takes the pair of a WH-question and one of its answers in contemporary spoken English as the research object and regards such pairs as WH-dialogic constructions. In this study we construct an Event-based Schema-Instance Cognitive Model (ESI model) to analyze the cognitive-functional properties of this category of dialogic constructions. The discoursal expansion and textual cohesion in discourse achieved through the application of such dialogic constructions indicate that the usage of WH-dialogic constructions is one of the basic cognitive strategies for human beings to construe the objective world.  

References

Baugh AC and Cable T (1978) A history of the English Language (3rd ed.). London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Brône G and Zima E (2014) Towards a dialogic construction grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 457–495.

Chomsky N (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky N (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua (130): 33–49.

Croft W and Cruse DA (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: CUP, pp.257–258.

Davies M (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.

Du Bois JW (2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410.

Ginzburg J and Sag I (2000) Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. CSLI Publications, pp.185.

Goldberg AE (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp.4.

Goldberg AE (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP, pp.3,177.

Hamblin CL (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1): 41–43.

Halliday MAK (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, pp.45–46.

Langacker RW (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp.371.

Langacker RW (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp.505–506.

Langacker RW (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP, pp.457,466.

Langacker RW (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Gramma. Mouton de Gruyter, pp.235.

Lehnert W (1997) Human and computational question answering. Cognitive Science (1): 37–73.

Taylor J (1989) Linguistic Categorization—Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: OUP, pp.59.

Taylor J (2002) Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP, pp.125.

Thomson AJ and Martinet AV (1986) A Practical English Grammar. Oxford: OUP, pp.71–74.

Zeng G (2015) A cognitive approach to the event structures of grammatical constructions. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University (1): 38–42.

Zeng G (2016) A cognitive approach to the event structures of WH-dialogic constructions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies (4): 311–324.

Zeng G (2018a) Book review: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Discourse Studies (6): 813–815.

Zeng G (2018b) The dialogic turn in cognitive linguistics studies: From minimalism, maximalism to dialogicalism. Cogent Education (Taylor & Francis) (5): 1537907. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1537907.

Published
2019-09-01
How to Cite
Zeng, G. (2019). The cognitive-functional properties of English WH-dialogic constructions in discourse. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18063/FLS.v1i1.1080
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019)
Section
Article

Copyright (c) 2019 author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under: 

OA - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types.