J. For. Sci., 2013, 59(4):159-168 | DOI: 10.17221/75/2012-JFS

Stand structure indices as tools to support forest management: an application in Trentino forests (Italy)Original Paper

F. Pastorella, A. Paletto
Agricultural Research Council, Villazzano di Trento, Italy

Stand structure and species diversity are two useful parameters to provide a synthetic measure of forest biodiversity. The stand structure is spatial distribution, mutual position, diameter and height differentiation of trees in a forest ecosystem and it highly influences habitat and species diversity. The forest stand and species diversity can be measured through indices that provide important information to better address silvicultural practices and forest management strategies in the short and long-term period. These indices can be combined in a composite index in order to evaluate the complex diversity at the stand level. The aim of the paper is to identify and to test a complex index (S-index) allowing to take into account both the tree species composition and the stand structure. S-index was applied in a case study in the north-east of Italy (Trentino province). The results show that the Norway spruce forests in Trentino province are characterized by a medium-low level of complexity (S-index is in a range between 0.14 and 0.46) due to a low tree species composition rather than to the stand structure (diametric differentiation and spatial distribution of trees).

Keywords: stand complexity; species diversity; diametric differentiation index; mingling index; contagion index; composite stand index

Published: April 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pastorella F, Paletto A. Stand structure indices as tools to support forest management: an application in Trentino forests (Italy). J. For. Sci.. 2013;59(4):159-168. doi: 10.17221/75/2012-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acker S.A., Sabin T.E., Ganio L.M., McKee W.A. (1998): Development of old-growth structure and timber volume growth trends in maturing Douglas-fir stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 104: 265-280. Go to original source...
    2. Aguirre O., Hui G., von Gadow K., Jiménez J. (2003): An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables. Forest Ecology and Management, 183: 137-145. Go to original source...
    3. Buongiorno J., Dahir S., Lu H.C., Lin C.R. (1994): Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. Forest Science, 40: 83-103.
    4. Comeau P., MacDonald R. (2012): Modelling light using SLIM & LITE. Available at http://www.ualberta.ca/~pcomeau/Light_Modeling/lightusingSLIM_and_LITE.htm (accessed November 6, 2012).
    5. Corona P., D'Orazio P., Lamonaca A., Portoghesi L. (2005): L'indice Winkelmass per l'inventariazione a fini assestamentali della diversità strutturale di soprassuoli forestali. [The Winkelmass index as a forest management tool for inventorying stand structure.] Forest@, 2: 225-232. Go to original source...
    6. Ferris R. (1999): A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests. Forestry, 72: 313-328. Go to original source...
    7. Füldner K. (1995): Zur Strukturbeschreibung in Mischbeständen. Forstarchiv, 66: 235-240.
    8. Gasparini, Tabacchi (2011): L'Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi forestali di Carbonio INFC 2005. [National Forestry and Carbon Sinks Inventory INFC 2005.] Milano, Edagricole: 653.
    9. Graz F. (2004): The behaviour of the species mingling index Msp in relation to species dominance and dispersion. European Journal of Forest Research, 123: 87-92. Go to original source...
    10. Jaehne S., Dohrenbusch A. (1997): Ein Verfahren zur Beurteilung der Bestandesdiversität. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 116: 333-345. Go to original source...
    11. Kuuluvainen T., Penttinen A., Leinonen K., Nygren M. (1996): Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: an example from boreal spruce forest in Southern Finland. Silva Fennica, 30: 315-328. Go to original source...
    12. Latham P.A., Zuuring H.R., Coble D.W. (1998): A method for quantifying vertical forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management, 104: 157-70. Go to original source...
    13. McElhinny C. (2002): Forest and Woodland Structure as an Index of Biodiversity: a Review. Canberra, Australian National University: 80.
    14. McElhinny C. (2005): Quantifying Stand Structural Complexity in Woodland and Dry Sclerophyll Forest, SouthEastern Australia. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Canberra, Australian National University: 206.
    15. Morisette J., Baret F., Privette J.L., Myneni R.B., Nickeson J., Garrigues S., Shabanov N., Weiss M., Fernandes R., Leblanc S., Kalacska M., SanchezAzofeifa G.A., Chubey M., Rivard B., Stenberg P., Rautiainen M., Voipio P., Manninen T., Pilant D., Lewis T., Iiames J., Colombo R., Meroni M., Busetto L., Cohen W., Turner D., Warner D., Petersen G.W., Seufert G., Cook R. (2006): Validation of global moderate resolution LAI products: a framework proposed within the CEOS land product validation subgroup. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Rempte Sensing, 44: 1804-1817. Go to original source...
    16. Motz K., Sterba H., Pommerening A. (2010): Sampling measures of tree diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 1985-1996. Go to original source...
    17. Odasso M. (2002): I tipi forestali del Trentino. [Forest types in Trentino.] Report del Centro di Ecologia Alpina, 25: 192.
    18. Pitkänen S. (1997): Correlation between stand structure and ground vegetation: an analytical approach. Plant Ecology, 131: 109-126. Go to original source...
    19. Pommerening A. (2002): Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry, 75: 305-324. Go to original source...
    20. Pommerening A. (2006): Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 224: 266-277. Go to original source...
    21. Pretzsch H. (1997): Analysis and modelling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony. Forest Ecology and Management, 97: 237-253. Go to original source...
    22. Rad E.J., Manthey M., Mataji A. (2009): Comparison of plant species diversity with different plant communities in deciduous forests. International Journal of Enviornmental Science and Technology, 6: 389-394. Go to original source...
    23. Spies T.A., Franklin J.F. (1991): The structure of natural young, mature, and old-growth douglas-fir forests in Oregon and Washington. In: Ruggiero L.F., Aubry K.B., Carey A.B., Huff M.H. (eds): Wildlife and Vegetation of Unmanaged Douglas-fir Forests. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285. Portland, USDA Forest Service: 91-109.
    24. Staudhammer C.L., LeMay V.M. (2001): Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 1105-1115. Go to original source...
    25. Su D., Yu D., Zhou L., Xie X., Liu Z., Dai L. (2012): Differences in the structure, species composition and diversity of primary and harvested forests on Changbai Mountain, Northeast China. Journal of Forest Science, 56: 285-293. Go to original source...
    26. Svensson J.S., Jeglum J.K. (2001): Structure and dynamics of an undisturbed old-growth Norway spruce forest on the rising Bothnian coastline. Forest Ecology and Management, 151: 67-79. Go to original source...
    27. Tan S.A., Salim R., Hamzah K.A., Mamat M.R. (2011): Correlation of forest canopy and forest ecological structures in a logged over forest. The Malaysian Forester, 74: 31-36.
    28. von Gadow K. (1993): Zur Bestandesbeschreibung in der Forsteinrichtung. Forst und Holz, 48: 601-606.
    29. von Gadow K., Hui G.Y., Albert M. (1998): The neighbourhood pattern - a new parameter for describing forest structures. Centralblatt Gesamtes Forstwesen, 115: 1-10.
    30. von Gadow K., Hui G. (1999): Modelling Forest Development. Amsterdam, Kluwer Academic Publisher: 213. Go to original source...
    31. Vorčák J., Merganič J., Saniga M. (2006): Structural diversity change and regeneration processes of the Norway spruce natural forest in Babia hora NNR in relation to altitude. Journal of Forest Science, 52: 399-409. Go to original source...
    32. Wang D.H., Tang S.C., Chiu C.M. (2006): Impact four years after thinning on the growth and stand structure of Taiwania plantation in the Liukuei experimental forest. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 21: 339-351.
    33. Zenner E.K. (2000): Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests? Ecological Applications, 10: 800-810. Go to original source...
    34. Zenner E.K., Hibbs D.E. (2000): A new method for modelling the heterogeneity of forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management, 129: 75-87. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content