Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?

Authors

  • Julian David Pillay UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa; and Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, South Africa
  • Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • Karin I Proper Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Simone A Tomaz UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • Willem van Mechelen Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Estelle V Lambert UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Keywords:

Pedometer, Self-perceived, Aerobic

Abstract

Background. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity.

Objectives. To examine the association between self-perceived and actual physical activity in relation to physical activity guidelines, with reference to volume, intensity and duration of steps/day, and to establish the level of agreement between pedometer-measured and selfreported ambulatory physical activity, in relation to current guidelines.

Methods. A convenience sample of adults (N=312; mean (standard deviation) age 37 (9) years), wore a pedometer (minimum 3 consecutive days) and completed a questionnaire that included information on physical activity patterns. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for age and gender, compared volume- and intensity-based steps according to meeting/not meeting guidelines (self-reported). The extent of agreement between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity was also determined.

Results. Average (SD) steps/day were 6 574 (3 541). Of a total of 312 participants’ self-reported data, those meeting guidelines (n=63) accumulated significantly more steps/day than those not meeting guidelines (8 753 (4 251) v. 6 022 (3 114) total steps/day and 1 772 (2 020) v. 421 (1 140) aerobic steps/day, respectively; p<0.0001). More than half of the group who self-reported meeting the guidelines did not meet guidelines as per pedometer data.

Conclusion. The use of pedometers as an alternative and/or adjunct to self-reported measures is an area for consideration. Steps/day recommendations that consider intensity-based steps may provide significant effects in improving fitness and health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Julian David Pillay, UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa; and Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, South Africa

PhD

Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander, UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

PhD

Karin I Proper, Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

PhD

Simone A Tomaz, UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

MPhil

Willem van Mechelen, Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

PhD

Estelle V Lambert, UCT/MRC Exercise Science and Sports Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

PhD

Downloads

Published

2014-10-15

How to Cite

Pillay, J. D., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., Proper, K. I., Tomaz, S. A., van Mechelen, W., & Lambert, E. V. (2014). Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current physical guidelines ‒ how do they relate?. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(3), 77–81. Retrieved from https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/sajsm/article/view/102

Issue

Section

Articles