Öz
The
aim of
this
study is to
estimate the public expenditure ratio (total public
expenditure/GNP) which maximizes economic growth
rate in Turkey. The first part of
the study focuses on the historical and theoretical framework of the public
expenditure and economic growth
relationship. In the second part the optimal size
of the public sector in Turkey is estimated using
Scully (1996) time series analysis. Scully
method, under the balanced budget assumption, is based on a regression
the equation that relates the public expenditure ratio and economic growth rate. Data covers the 1950-2006 period. Model is tested by using Augmented Dickey-Fuller
(ADF), Johansen (1988, 1995) Cointegration and a Vector Error Correction Model
(VECM). In the model, it was
concluded that the optimal
size of the public sector in Turkey is about 23.5% of GNP.
Kaynakça
- Chao, J., H. Grubel (1998) “Optimal Levels of Spending and Taxation in Canada”, In Herbert Grubel, (Ed.), How to Use the Fiscal Surplus, Vancouver: The Fraser Instute, 53-68.
- Clemens, J., N. Veldhius (2010) “Size of Government and Economic Growth”, http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/175.
- D’ambrosio, C. (2001) “How Much Should the Government Spend?”, Review of Income and Wealth, 47 (3), 399-404.
- Engle, R.F., C.W.J. Granger (1987) “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
- Feldstein, M. (1997) “How Big Should Government Be?”, National Tax Journal, 50(2), 197-213.
- Grossman, P. (1988) “Government and Economic Growth: A Non-Linear Relationship”, Public Choice, 56(2), 193-200.
- Gujarati, D. (2001) Temel Ekonometri, (çev.: Ü. Şenesen, G.G. Şenesen), İstanbul: Literatür yayıncılık.
- Mackness, W. (1999) “Canadian Public Spending: The Case for Smaller More Efficient Government” Public Policy Source, No. 13, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, 1-38.
- Mutaşcu, M., M. Miloş (2009) “Optimal Size of Government Spending. The Case of European Union Member States”, Annales Universitas Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 11(1), 447-456.
- Peden, E. (1991) “Productivity in the United States and Its Relationship to Government Activity: An Analysis of 57 Years, 1929-1986”, Public Choice, 69(2), 153-73.
- Peden, E., M. Bradley (1989) “Government Size, Productivity, and Economic Growth: The Post-War Experience”, Public Choice, 61(3), 229-245.
- Schaefer, B.D. (2006) “How the Scope of Government Shapes the Wealth of Nations”, Heritage Lectures, No. 925, 1-17.
- Scully, G.W. (1989) “The Size of the State, Economic Growth and the Efficient Utilization of National Resources”, Public Choice, 63(2), 149-64.
- Scully, G.W. (1994) What is the Optimal Size of Government?, Policy Report, No.188, Dallas: National Centre for Policy Analysis.
- Scully, G.W. (1995) “The ‘Growth Tax’ in the United States”, Public Choice, 85(1-2), 71–80.
- Scully, G.W. (1996) “Taxation and Economic Growth in New Zealand”, Pacific Economic Review, 1(2), 169–77.
- Scully, G.W. (2003) “Optimal Taxation, Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, Public Choice, 115(3-4), 299-313.
- Tanzi, V., L. Schuknecht (1998) “Can Small Governments Secure Economic and Social Well-being”, In Herbert Grubel (Ed.), How to Use the Fiscal Surplus, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, 69-92.
- Vedder, R., L. Gallaway (1998) “Government Size and Economic Growth”, Washington: Joint Economic Committee, http://www.house.gov/jec/
Öz
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de iktisadi büyümeyi maksimum kılan kamu harcama oranını (toplam kamu harcaması/GSMH) tahmin etmektir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümü, kamu harcaması ve iktisadi büyüme ilişkisine dair tarihi ve teorik çerçeveye odaklanmaktadır. İkinci bölümde ise, Scully zaman serisi yöntemi (1996) kullanılarak Türkiye için kamu kesiminin optimal hacmi tahmin edilmiştir. Scully yöntemi, iktisadi büyüme oranı ile kamu harcama oranını ilişkilendiren bir denklemin regresyonuna dayanır. Data 1950-2006 dönemini kapsamaktadır. Model, Genişletilmiş Dickey-Fuller (ADF) testi, Johansen eşbütünleşme testi ve bir hata düzeltme modeli (ECM) kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Modelde, Türkiye’de optimal kamu kesimi büyüklüğünün GSMH’nın yaklaşık %24.8’ine eşit olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Chao, J., H. Grubel (1998) “Optimal Levels of Spending and Taxation in Canada”, In Herbert Grubel, (Ed.), How to Use the Fiscal Surplus, Vancouver: The Fraser Instute, 53-68.
- Clemens, J., N. Veldhius (2010) “Size of Government and Economic Growth”, http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/175.
- D’ambrosio, C. (2001) “How Much Should the Government Spend?”, Review of Income and Wealth, 47 (3), 399-404.
- Engle, R.F., C.W.J. Granger (1987) “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
- Feldstein, M. (1997) “How Big Should Government Be?”, National Tax Journal, 50(2), 197-213.
- Grossman, P. (1988) “Government and Economic Growth: A Non-Linear Relationship”, Public Choice, 56(2), 193-200.
- Gujarati, D. (2001) Temel Ekonometri, (çev.: Ü. Şenesen, G.G. Şenesen), İstanbul: Literatür yayıncılık.
- Mackness, W. (1999) “Canadian Public Spending: The Case for Smaller More Efficient Government” Public Policy Source, No. 13, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, 1-38.
- Mutaşcu, M., M. Miloş (2009) “Optimal Size of Government Spending. The Case of European Union Member States”, Annales Universitas Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 11(1), 447-456.
- Peden, E. (1991) “Productivity in the United States and Its Relationship to Government Activity: An Analysis of 57 Years, 1929-1986”, Public Choice, 69(2), 153-73.
- Peden, E., M. Bradley (1989) “Government Size, Productivity, and Economic Growth: The Post-War Experience”, Public Choice, 61(3), 229-245.
- Schaefer, B.D. (2006) “How the Scope of Government Shapes the Wealth of Nations”, Heritage Lectures, No. 925, 1-17.
- Scully, G.W. (1989) “The Size of the State, Economic Growth and the Efficient Utilization of National Resources”, Public Choice, 63(2), 149-64.
- Scully, G.W. (1994) What is the Optimal Size of Government?, Policy Report, No.188, Dallas: National Centre for Policy Analysis.
- Scully, G.W. (1995) “The ‘Growth Tax’ in the United States”, Public Choice, 85(1-2), 71–80.
- Scully, G.W. (1996) “Taxation and Economic Growth in New Zealand”, Pacific Economic Review, 1(2), 169–77.
- Scully, G.W. (2003) “Optimal Taxation, Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, Public Choice, 115(3-4), 299-313.
- Tanzi, V., L. Schuknecht (1998) “Can Small Governments Secure Economic and Social Well-being”, In Herbert Grubel (Ed.), How to Use the Fiscal Surplus, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, 69-92.
- Vedder, R., L. Gallaway (1998) “Government Size and Economic Growth”, Washington: Joint Economic Committee, http://www.house.gov/jec/
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Eylül 2016 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 3 Şubat 2015 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2016 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3 |
Kaynak Göster
Cited By
Testing the Armey Curve Hypothesis in Turkey: Evidence from the Provincial Data
Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis
https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1206552
TÜRKİYE’DE ABRAMS VE ARMEY EĞRİLERİNİN GEÇERLİLİĞİ
Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.730089
ÜLKELERİN GELİŞMİŞLİK SEVİYESİ OPTİMAL KAMU BÜYÜKLÜĞÜNÜ NASIL ETKİLEMEKTEDİR: PANEL DATA ANALİZİ İLE UYGULAMALI BİR ÇALIŞMA
Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi
Rıza BAYRAK
https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.870485
Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.
Gizlilik Beyanı
Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.