Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dispersal of wetland plant seeds by mallards: Influence of gut passage on recovery, retention, and germination

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seed dispersal is an important process for plants, but may be particularly important for plants occurring in spatially isolated habitats like wetlands. Variation in the geographic distribution of wetland plant species may be strongly influenced by their ability to use waterbirds, particularly waterfowl to enhance dispersal. We used controlled feeding and germination experiments to investigate recovery, retention time, and germination for the seeds of 10 wetland plant species (Chenopodium album, Digitaria ischaemum, Echinochloa colonum, Echinochloa crusgalli, Eleocharis palustris, Panicum dichotomiflorum, Polygonum lapathifolium, Polygonum pensylvanicum, Rumex crispus, and Scheonoplectus maritimus) and compared how these metrics varied with seed characteristics. We fed a known number of seeds to captive raised mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and collected fecal samples every 4 hours for 48 hours; all recovered seeds were planted in seedling trays and watched for 60 days to monitor germination. We conducted 10 trials and fed each seed species in each trial, and included germination controls of non-consumed seeds. Overall, 19.0 ± 1.8% (mean ± SE) of seeds were recovered and of recovered seeds 7.6 ± 1.2% germinated. Recovery ranged from 1.9 ± 0.6% in D. ischaemum to 51.0 ± 4.7% in S. maritimus and germination ranged from < 0.5% in D. ischaemum to 28.5 ± 5.7% in R. crispus. Recovery and germination were not related to seed size or mass (p > 0.5) but recovery was positively correlated with seed fiber content (r2 = 0.44, p = 0.04). Control seeds germinated better than fed seeds for all species except S. maritimus, where fed seeds germinated better. Germination percentage declined with gut retention time for four of seven species. We suggest despite the large differences in viable seeds recovered, mallards may be important dispersers for the seeds of most species we studied and hypothesize that observed variation may be attributable to different plant strategies that relate to reproductive tactics and habitat type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Agami, M. and Y. Waisel. 1986. The role of mallard ducks (Anas platyvhynchos) in distribution and germination of seeds of the submerged hydrophyte Najas marina L. Oecologia 68: 473–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amezaga, J. M., L. Santamaria, and A. J. Green. 2002. Biotic wetland connectivity-supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta Oecologica 23: 213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, seventeenth edition. Association of Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augspurger, C. K. and C. K. Kelly. 1984. Pathogen mortality of tropical tree seedling: experimental studies of the effects of dispersal distance, seedling density, and light conditions. Oecologia 61: 211–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacles, C. F. E., A. J. Lowe, and R. A. Ennos. 2006. Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science 311: 628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose, F. C. and R. C. Crompton. 1981. Migration speeds of three waterfowl species. Wilson Bulletin 93: 121–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, C. M. and R. A. Ojeda. 1997. Dispersal and germination of Prosopis flexuosa (Fabaceae) seeds by desert mammals in Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 35: 707–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambidou, I. and L. Santamaría. 2002. Waterbirds as endozoochorous dispersers of aquatic organisms: a review of experimental evidence. Acta Oecologica 23: 165–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambidou, I., L. Santamaría, C. Jansen, and B. A. Nolet. 2005. Digestive plasticity in mallard ducks modulates dispersal probabilities of aquatic plants and crustaceans. Functional Ecology 19: 513–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambidou, I., L. Santamaria, and O. Langevoord. 2003. Effect of ingestion by five avian dispersers on the retention time, retrieval and germination of Ruppia maritima seeds. Functional Ecology 17: 747–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. G. and G. C. Gentle. 1990. Estimates of grain passage time in captive mallards. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 2275–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, P., B. A. Nolet, A. D. Fox, and M. Klaassen. 2002. Long-distance endozoochorous dispersal of submerged macrophyte seeds by migratory waterbirds in northern Europe — a critical review of possibilities and limitations. Acta Oecologica 23: 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. B. 1989. Lags in vegetation response to greenhouse warming. Climatic Change 15: 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deVlaming, V. and V. W. Proctor. 1968. Dispersal of aquatic organisms: viability of seeds recovered from the droppings of captive killdeer and mallard ducks. American Journal of Botany 55: 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drilling, N., R. Titman, and F. McKinney. 2002. Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). In A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 658. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, B. D., M. L. Moore, R. S. Finger, and M. J. Petrie. 2007. True metabolizable energy for seeds of common moist-soil plant species. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 1964–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinar, J. L., L. V. Garcia, J. Figuerola, A. J. Green, and L. Clemente. 2004. Helophyte germination in a Mediterranean salt marsh: gut passage by ducks changes seed response to salinity. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 315–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figuerola, J. and A. J. Green. 2002. Dispersal of aquatic organisms by waterbirds: a review of past research and priorities for future studies. Freshwater Biology 47: 483–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figuerola, J. and A. J. Green. 2005. Effects of premigratory fasting on the potential for long distance dispersal of seeds by waterfowl: an experiment with marbled teal. Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 60: 283–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figuerola, J., A. J. Green, and L. Santamaria. 2002. Comparative dispersal effectiveness of wigeongrass seeds by waterfowl wintering in south-west Spain: quantitative and qualitative aspects. Journal of Ecology 90: 989–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figuerola, J., L. Santamaria, A. J. Green, I. Luque, R. Alvarez, and I. Charalambidou. 2005. Endozoochorous dispersal of aquatic plants: does seed gut passage affect plant performance? American Journal of Botany 92: 696–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. J., J. Figuerola, and M. I. Sánchez. 2002. Implications of waterbird ecology for the dispersal of aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23: 177–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. K., B. D. Dugger, D. A. Graber, and M. J. Petrie. 2007. The effects of seasonal flooding on seed availability for spring migrating waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 1561–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintzelman, D. S. 1978. North American Ducks, Geese, and Swans. Winchester Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, M. C. 1995. Plant-vertebrate seed dispersal system in the Mediterranean: ecology, evolutionary, and historical determinants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 705–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H. F. and M. N. Miriti. 2004. When seed dispersal matters. BioScience 54: 651–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H. F., E. W. Schupp, and L. C. Westley. 1985. Early consequences of seed dispersal for a neotropical tree (Virola surinamensis). Ecology 66: 781–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H. H. and J. Smallwood. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 201–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist 104: 501–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, R. C., W. W. Stroup, and R. J. Freund. 2002. SAS for Linear Models, fourth edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkey, K. R. and R. D. Drake. 2005. Flying foxes cease to function as seed dispersers long before they become rare. Ecology 87: 271–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. R. 1975. Gut morpholopgy of mallards in relation to diet quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 39: 168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. R. 1987. Fall and winter foods of northern pintails in the Sacramento Valley, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 51: 405–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. H. and A. G. van der Valk. 2002. The potential role of ducks in wetland seed dispersal. Wetlands 22: 170–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, R. and H. C. Muller-Landau. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15: 278–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. J., R. D. Drobney, and D. A. Graber. 1997. Evaluation of true metabolizable energy for waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 420–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollux, B. J., A. L. Santamaria, and N. J. Ouborg. 2005. Differences in endozoochorous dispersal between aquatic plant species, with reference to plant population persistence in rivers. Freshwater Biology 50: 232–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, K. D., R. E. Noble, and R. H. Chabreck. 1978. Seed distribution by waterfowl in southwestern Louisiana. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, H. N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. L. Reeve & Co. Ltd., Ashford, Kent, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, B. and M. Parent. 1991. Germination responses of 64 wetland species in relation to seed size, minimum time to reproduction and seeding relative growth rate. Functional Ecology 5: 111–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soothill, E. and P. Whitehead. 1978. Wildfowl of the World. Blandford Press, Poole, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapanian, M. A. 1986. Seed dispersal by birds and squirrels in the deciduous forests of the United States. p. 325–36, In A. Estrada and T. H. Fleming (eds.) Frugivores and Seed Dispersal. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, F. S. 1996. Natural History of the Waterfowl. Ibis Publishing Co., San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traveset, A. 1998. Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1: 151–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenny, D. G. 2001. Advantages of seed dispersal: a re-evaluation of directed dispersal. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenny, D. G. and D. J. Levey. 1998. Directed seed dispersal by bellbirds in tropical cloud forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 95: 6204–07.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wongsriphuek, C., Dugger, B.D. & Bartuszevige, A.M. Dispersal of wetland plant seeds by mallards: Influence of gut passage on recovery, retention, and germination. Wetlands 28, 290–299 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1672/07-101.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/07-101.1

Key Words

Navigation