Skip to main content
Log in

Workability tests and rheological parameters in self-compacting concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characterization of the behaviour in the fresh state is critical for self compacting concrete (SCC), and it is usually performed through tests such as the slump flow or the V-funnel. A better description of SCC behaviour can be performed by using viscometers. It has been recognized that in SCC an adequate combination of the rheological parameters (yield stress and plastic viscosity) is required to obtain a mix with enough mobility but avoiding risks of segregation. This paper analyses the relationship between the engineering tests results and the rheological parameters. The experimental data corresponds to an extensive research program, where the effects of the mixing energy, time, concrete temperature and environmental exposure conditions on the rheological behaviour of SCC were studied. Simultaneous measurements with a BML viscometer, the slump flow and the V-funnel tests were carried out on different types of SCC. Relationships between the slump flow and the yield stress, and between the plastic viscosity and the flow times have been found for the same component materials. In addition, typical ranges of yield stress and plastic viscosity for each class of SCC have been identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EFNARC (2002) Specifications and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. http://www.efnarc.org/pdf/SandGforSCC.PDF. Accessed Feb 2002

  2. Concrete Society (2005) Self-compacting concrete—a review. Technical Report No. 62, CCIP-001, Camberley, UK

  3. EPG (2005) The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete specification production and use. http://www.efnarc.org/pdf/SCCGuidelinesMay2005.pdf. Accessed May 2005

  4. Bartos PJM (2005) Assessment of key characteristics of fresh selfcompacting concrete: European approach to standardisation of tests. In: Shah SP (ed) Second North American conference on the design and use of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) and fourth international RILEM symposium on self-compacting concrete, Hanley Wood Publications, Addison, pp 807–830

  5. Assaad J, Khayat KH, Mesbah H (2003) Assessment of thixotropy of flowable and self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 100(2):99–107

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferraris C, de Larrard F, Martys N (1998) Fresh concrete rheology: recent developments. In: Skalny J, Mindess S (eds) Materials science of concrete V. American Ceramic Society, USA, pp 215–241

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koehler EP, Fowler DW (2005) A portable rheometer for self-consolidating concrete. In: Shah SP (ed) Second North American conference on the design and use of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) and fourth international RILEM symposium on self-compacting concrete. Hanley Wood Publications, Addison, IL, USA, pp 693–699

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koehler EP, Fowler DW, Ferraris CF, Amziane S (2006) A new, portable rheometer for fresh self-consolidating concrete. In: Shi C, Khayat KH (eds) ACI SP-233-7, pp 97–115

  9. Zerbino R, Agulló L, Barragán B, García T, Gettu R (2006) Caracterización reológica de hormigones autocompactables. In: Ed: Dto. Ing. de la Construcción Univ. Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, ISBN: 84-87691-40-4-2, 83 pp (in Spanish)

  10. Beaupré D, Mindess S (1998) Rheology of fresh concrete: principles, measurement, and applications. In: Skalny J, Mindess S (eds) Materials science of concrete V. American Ceramic Society, USA, pp 149–190

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsson I, Wallevik OH (2003) Rheological evaluation of some empirical test methods—preliminary results. In: Wallevik O, Nielsson I (eds) Third international RILEM symposium, RILEM Pub. PRO 33. Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 59–68

  12. Brower LE, Ferraris CF (2003) Comparison of concrete rheometers. Concr Int 25(8), 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallevik JE (2006) Relationship between the Bingham parameters and slump. Cem Concr Res 36:1214–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saak AW, Jennings HM, Shah SP (2004) A generalized approach for the determination of yield stress by slump and slump flow. Cem Concr Res 34:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen B, Smeplass S (2003) The relationship between the rheological properties of SCC and the corresponding matrix phase. In: Wallevik O, Nielsson I (eds) Third international RILEM symposium, RILEM Pub. PRO 33. Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 106–116

  16. Ferraris CF, Brower L, Ozyildirim C, Daczko J (2000) Workability of self-compacting concrete. Reprinted from The economical solution for durable bridges and transportation, structures. International symposium on high performance concrete, PCI/FHWA/FIB, Orlando, FL, pp 398–407

  17. Koyata H, Comman C (2005) Workability measurement and developing robust SCC mixture design. In: Shah SP (ed) Second North American conference on the design and use of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) and fourth international RILEM symposium on self-compacting concrete. Hanley Wood Publications, Addison, pp 799–805

    Google Scholar 

  18. Utsi S, Emborg M, Carlswärd J (2003) Relation between workability and rheological parameters. In: Wallevik O, Nielsson I (eds) Third international RILEM symposium, RILEM Pub. PRO 33. Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 154–164

  19. Kordts S, Breit W (2003) Controlling the workability properties of self-compacting concrete used as ready-mixed concrete. In: Wallevik O, Nielsson I (eds) Third international RILEM symposium, RILEM Pub. PRO 33. Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 220–231

  20. Carlswärd J, Emborg M, Utsi S, Öberg P (2003) Effect of constituents on the workability and rheology of self-compacting concrete. In: Wallevik O, Nielsson I (eds) Third international RILEM symposium, RILEM Pub. PRO 33. Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 143–153

  21. Sedran T, de Larrard F (1999) Optimization of self-compacting concrete thanks to packing model. In: Skarendahl A, Petersson O (eds) First international RILEM symposium of self-compacting concrete. RILEM Publications, Cachan, Francia, pp 321–332

    Google Scholar 

  22. Safawi MI, Iwaki I, Miura T (2005) A study on the applicability of vibration in fresh high fluidity concrete. Cem Concr Res 35:1834–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walraven J (2005) Self compacting concrete: challenge for designer and researcher. In: Shah SP (ed) Second North American Conference on the design and use of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) and fourth international RILEM symposium on self-compacting concrete. Hanley Wood Publications, Addison, IL, USA, pp 431–446

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, through grants MAT2003-5530, BIA2006-15471-C02-01 and PSE 11-2005 (PS-380000-2007-1): “HABITAT 2030”, is greatly appreciated. The first author received financial support from Programme Alβan, the European Union Programme of High Level Scholarships for Latin America, scholarship No. E04E047473AR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Zerbino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zerbino, R., Barragán, B., Garcia, T. et al. Workability tests and rheological parameters in self-compacting concrete. Mater Struct 42, 947–960 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9434-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9434-2

Keywords

Navigation