Skip to main content
Log in

The Archaeometallurgical Implications of New Findings of Traditional Crafts of Making High Tin ‘Delta’ Bronze Mirrors and ‘Beta’ Bronze Vessels in Kerala State of South India

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

New metallurgical and ethnographic observations of the traditional manufacture of specular high-tin bronze mirrors in Kerala state of southern India are discussed, which is an exceptional example of a surviving craft practice of metal mirror-making in the world. The manufacturing process has been reconstructed from analytical investigations made by Srinivasan following a visit late in 1991 to a mirror making workshop and from her technical studies of equipment acquired by Glover in March 1992 from another group of mirror makers from Pathanamthita at an exhibition held at Crafts Museum, Delhi. Finished and unfinished mirror from two workshops were of a binary, copper-tin alloy of 33% tin which is close to the composition of pure delta phase, so that these mirrors are referred to here as ‘delta’ bronzes. For the first time, metallurgical and field observations were made by Srinivasan in 1991 of the manufacture of high-tin ‘beta’ bonze vessels from Palghat district, Kerala, i.e. of wrought and quenched 23% tin bronze. This has provided the first metallurgical record for a surviving craft of high-tin bronze bowl making which can be directly related to archaeological finds of high-tin bronze vessels from the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia. New analytical investigations are presented of high-tin beta bronzes from the Indian subcontinent which are some of the earliest reported worldwide. These coupled with the archaeometallurgical evidence suggests that these high-tin bronze techniques are part of a long, continuing, and probably indigenous tradition of the use of high-tin bronzes in the Indian subcontinent with finds reported even from Indus Valley sites. While the source of tin has been problematic, new evidence on bronze smelting slags and literary evidence suggests there may have been some sources of tin in South India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiet P., Halim M. A., Jansen M., Jarrige C. and others. 1988. Les cités oubliées de ’Indus. Paris: Musée National des Arts Asiatiques Guimet and Association Française ‘Action Artistique’

    Google Scholar 

  • G. L. Bailey and W. A. Baker 1949. Melting and casting of non-ferrous metals. Symposium on metallurgical aspects of non-ferrous metal melting and casting of ingots fro working, Institute of Metals Monograph & Report Series, 6, 7–32. London: Institute of Metals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett A. and I. C.Glover 1992. Decorated high-tin bronzes from Thailands's prehistory. Southeast Asian Archaeology 1990. I.C. Glover (ed.) Hull University: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A. K. 1996. Minerals and Metals in Ancient India. Volume I. Archaeological Evidence New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.

  • Breeks J. W. 1873. An account of the Primitive tribes and Monuments of the Nilgiris. London: W. H. Allen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti D.K. 1979. The problem of tin in India. Man and Environment. 3: 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo S.B. 1991. Roman trade: Recent archaeological discoveries in Western India. In: Begley V. and De Puma R. D. (eds). Rome and India: The Ancient Sea Trade. USA: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 82–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodway M. and Conklin H. C. 1987. Quenched high-tin bronze from the Philippines. Archaeomaterials. 2(1): 1–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover I. C. 1990. Early Trade Between India and Southeast Asia — a Link in the Development of a World Trading System. Occasional Paper No. 16.(2nd revised ed.) University of Hull: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.

  • Keay J. 1981. India discovered... Leicester: Windward

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppuram G. 1986. Imperial Cholas of Karnataka. Delhi: Sundeep Prakasha

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshnik L. 1974. The Pandukal Complex- South Indian Megalithic Burials Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malroney C. 1975. Archaeology of South India-accomplishments and prospects. Essays in South India. Burton Stein (ed.). Hawaii: The University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J. 1951. Taxila. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay E. 1937-38. Further Excavations at Mohenjodaro. 3 Vol. London.

  • Meeks N.D. 1986. Tin-rich surfaces on bronze-some experimental and archaeological considerations. Archaeometry 28(2): 133–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks N. D. 1993a. Patination phenomena on Roman and Chinese high-tin bronze mirrors and other artefacts. In: La Niece S. and Craddock P. (eds.) Metal Plating and Patination. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 63–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks N. D. 1993b Surface characterisation of tinned bronze, high-tin bronze, tinned iron and arsenical bronze. Metal Plating and Patination. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramasivan S. 1941. Investigations on ancient Indian metallurgy; A pre-historic bronze bowl. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences. 13(2), Sec. A, pp. 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajpitak W. and Seeley N.J. 1979. The bronze bowls of Ban Don Ta Phet Thailand: an enigma of prehistoric metallurgy. World Archaeology. 11: 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajpitak W. 1983. The Development of Copper-Alloy Metallurgy in Thailand in the pre- Buddhist period with special reference to high-tin bronze. Ph.D. Thesis, London: Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea A. 1915. Catalogue of Prehistoric Antiquities from Adichanallur and Perumbair. Madras: Madras Government Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves M.R., Bowden J.S. and Cuthbertson J. W. 1953. Tin bronzes. A report on the micro-structures of those containing 15-28 per cent of tin. Metal Industry, January 16, 1953: 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D. 1991. Metallography and micro-structure of ancient and historic metals. Singapore: The J. Paul Getty Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoukang Z. and Tangkun He. 1993. Studies of ancient Chinese mirrors and other bronze artefacts. In: La Niece S. and Craddock P. (eds.) Metal Plating and Patination. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, C., Holmyard, E. J. Hall, A. R. and Williams, T.I. (eds.) 1957. A History of Technology. Vol III. From the Renaissance to the Industrial Revolution, c1500–c1750. Oxford: Clarendon Pres

  • Srinivasan S. 1994. High-tin bronze bowl making in Kerala. A. Parpola and P. Koskikallio (eds.). South Asian Archaeology 1993. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the European Association of South Asian Archaeologists held in Helsinki 5-9 July 1993, Vol. 2. 695–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan S. and Glover I. 1995. Wrought and quenched, and cast high-tin bronzes from Kerala southern India. Journal of Historical Metallurgy. 29(2). Institute of Metals, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan S. In Press. The composition of bronze slags from Kalyadi in South India and the implications for the problem of tin in South Indian antiquity. Archaeological Sciences 1995. Oxbow Archaeological Monograph Series. University of Liverpool in association with Council for British Archaeology.

  • Thomas A. 1991. Aranmula kannadi. The enigmatic mirror from Aranmula. The Indie Magazine. Vol. 11, Nov 1991: 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar M., Ganorkar M.C., Rao, V.P. Gayathri P. 1987. A study of Vishnukundin coins. Bulletin of Material Science 9 (2): 137–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the following for their contributions: Dr. N. J. Seeley, National Trust, UK who initiated Srinivasan's interest in the study done during doctoral research at Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Dr. D. Griffiths, Dr. J. F. Merkel and Dr. A. Bennett, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Dr. N.D. Meeks, Dr. P. Craddock and Dr. 1. Freestone, British Museum Research laboratory, Prof. J. Charles, Cambridge University, Dr. J. Marr, Institute of Indian Culture, London, Dr. W.T. Chase, Smithsonian Institution, Washington; and in India, Government Museum, Madras and Director, Dr. Devasahayan and Dr. S. Desikan, and R. Krishnamurthy of Dinamalar, Madras, in India, and Pakistan Archaeological Survey, for samples from Swat Valley obtained for the study, and Prof. S. Ranganathan and Prof. K. Chattopadhyay of Indian Institute of Science and Prof. S. Chitre, Homi Bhabha Research Council, and the craftsmen in Kerala. Doctoral and field research by Srinivasan was supported by a British Chevening Scholarship from British Council, New Delhi, Ancient India and Iran Trust, Gordon Childe Fund and Central Research Fund, University of London. Srinivasan is thankful to the Materials Research Society for a MRS 1996 Graduate Student Award for the paper presented at Material Issues in Art and Archaeology-V symposium held at the MRS proceedings in Boston in 1996.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, S., Glover, I. The Archaeometallurgical Implications of New Findings of Traditional Crafts of Making High Tin ‘Delta’ Bronze Mirrors and ‘Beta’ Bronze Vessels in Kerala State of South India. MRS Online Proceedings Library 462, 81–103 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-462-81

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-462-81

Navigation