Abstract
Two equations for determining the hardness of thin films from depth-sensing indentation data are examined. The first equation is based on an empirical fit of hardness versus indenter displacement data obtained from finite element calculations on a variety of hypothetical films. The second equation is based on a model which assumes that measured hardness is determined by the weighted average of the volume of plastically deformed material in the coating and that in the substrate. The equations are evaluated by fitting the predicted hardness versus contact depth to data obtained from titanium coatings on a sapphire substrate. Only the volume fractions model allows the data to be fitted with a single adjustable parameter, the film hardness; the finite element equation requires two thickness-dependent parameters to obtain acceptable fits. It is argued that the difficulty in applying the finite element model lies in the use of an unrealistic area function for the indenter. For real indenters, which have finite radii, the area function must appear explicitly in the final equation. This is difficult to do with the finite element approach, but is naturally incorporated into the volume fractions equation. Finally, using the volume fractions approach the hardnesses of the titanium films are found to be relatively insensitive to film thickness. Thus, the apparent increase in hardness with decreasing film thickness for the titanium films is most likely due to increased interactions between the film and substrate for the thinner films rather than to a change in the basic structure of the titanium films.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. K. Battacharya and W. D. Nix, Int. J. Solids Structures 24 12, 1287–1298 (1988).
P. M. Sargent, in Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering, edited by P.J. Blau and B.R. Lawn (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1986).
P.J. Burnett and T.F. Page, J. Mater. Sci. 19, 845–860 (1984).
P.J. Burnett and D.S. Rickerby, Thin Solid Films 148, 41–50 (1987).
P.J. Burnett and D.S. Rickerby, Thin Solid Films 148, 51–65 (1987).
B. R. Lawn, A. G. Evans, and D. B. Marshall, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63, 574–581 (1980).
R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Oxford University Press, London, 1950), Chap. 5.
S.J. Bull and D.S. Rickerby, Br. Ceram. Trans. J. 88, 177–183 (1989).
B. D. Fabes and W. C. Oliver, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties II, edited by M. F. Doerner, W. C. Oliver, G. M. Pharr, and F. R. Brotzen (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 188, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 127–132.
J. B. Pethica, R. Hutchings, and W. C. Oliver, Philos. Mag. A48, 593 (1983).
J. B. Pethica and W. C. Oliver, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties, edited by J. C. Bravman, W. D. Nix, D. M. Barnett, and D.A. Smith (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 130, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), pp. 13-23.
W.C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).
F.A. McClintock and A. S. Argon, Mechanical Behavior of Materials (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1966).
D. M. Marsh, Proc. R. Soc. A 279, 420–435 (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fabes, B.D., Oliver, W.C., McKee, R.A. et al. The determination of film hardness from the composite response of film and substrate to nanometer scale indentations. Journal of Materials Research 7, 3056–3064 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.3056
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.3056