Analyzing the Values in the Built Heritage of Chettinadu Region, Tamil Nadu, India

Authors

  • Seetha RajivKumar Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15415/cs.2019.71005

Keywords:

Built Heritage, Architectural Values, Cultural Values, Environmental Values, Chettinadu

Abstract

Chettinadu, a region in southern India, is situated in Tamil Nadu State 32 km from the west coast of the Bay of Bengal with a total area of 1,550 square kilometers in the heart of Tamil Nadu. The built heritage of Chettinadu is an irreplaceable cultural resource giving it a unique identity and character. In the tentative list of UNESCO 2014, the Chettinadu region has been classified into three clusters based on their Outstanding Universal Values and this provides a framework for our research.The region has experienced a tremendous amount of change from its original design and the old buildings are mirrors of the procession of history and culture that together have formed the heritage of the town. Well known for its palatial mansions with their unique architectural style, the conservation of old buildings is a must in retaining the character of the city. In this paper we studied the historical background of heritage areas and buildings in the Chettinadu region and attempted to establish the values in the built heritage by means of a selected set of variables. To achieve this objective various parameters were analyzed as how the values of the built heritage contribute to the unique sociocultural flavor of Chettinadu. Social, cultural, historical, and architectural values all enhance the image of the town, but assessing their relative importance for purposes of urban planning is a significant challenge. This analysis support the evolution of strategies targeted at preserving and enhancing the built heritage of the region. The varied heritage potential based on the values will help planners and developers to create sustainable programs for modernizing the infrastructure while protecting the inherent values of the built heritage of Chettinadu.

Search Keywords for This Page:

Chettinad Architecture Thesis, Beri Chettiar History, Mansions of Chettinad pdf, Athangudi Tiles Lifespan, Chettinad Village, Chettinad buildings, Chettinad Architecture, Chettinad History

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australia ICOMOS (1979) “The Australia ICOMOS Guidelines for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance (‘Burra Charter’).” Accessed March 17, 2016. http://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/Burra-Charter_1979.pdf

Australia ICOMOS (1988)Guidelines to the Burra Charter: procedures for undertaking studies and reports. Electronic document, http://www.marquiskyle.com.au/bcstudies.htm, accessed September 27, 2012.

Australia ICOMOS (1999). “The Burra Charter” Electronic document, Retrieved from http://australia.icomos.org/publications/charters.

Avrami, E. (2000). Values and heritage conservation. Conservation: The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter, 15(2), 18–21.

AZMI, Nur Farhana; AHMAD, Faizah; ALI, Azlan Shah (2015) Heritage place inventory: A tool for establishing the significance of places. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 15, n. 1, ISSN 2232-1500. doi: https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol15no1.3. 15–23.

Cathy. L. Costin, (1993). Legal and Policy Issues in the Protection of Cultural Heritage in South Asia and the Pacific. In Margaret G. H. Mac Lean (Editor), Cultural Heritage in Asia and the Pacific: Conservation and Policy. Proceedings of a symposium held in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 8–13.

Chari, K. (2015). In search of roots: the start of a journey to uncover the ancient Hindu concept of’ Art as Experience in India, today. An exploration of Indian metaphysics as the foundation of this concept (Doctoral dissertation).

Choay, F. and O Connell, L. M. (2001). The invention of the historic monument.

De la Torre, M. (2013). Values and héritage conservation. Heritage & Society, 6(2), 155–166.

Feilden, B. M., and Jokilehto, J. (1998). Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites.

Feilden, B. (2003) . Conservation of Historic Buildings. Oxford: Elsevier.

Ferdous Farhana Huq, Rabeya Akter, Roxana Hafiz, Abdullah Al Mamun, Mashrekur Rahman.(2014) “Conservation planning of built heritages of Old Dhaka, Bangladesh”, Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 244–271

Frey Bruno. (1997). “The Evaluation of Cultural Heritage: Some Critical Issues.” In Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage, edited by M. Hutter and I. Rizzo, 31–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-25824-6_3.

Goussous, J. S. and Al-Hammadi, N. A. (2018). Place attachment assessment of a heritage place: A case studyof the Roman amphitheater in downtown Amman, Jordan. Frontiers of Architectural Research.

Hearn, M. F. (1990). The Architectural Theory of Violletle-Duc Readings and Commentaries. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-11

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

 

Articles in the Journal of Creative Space (Creat. Sp.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://cs.chitkara.edu.in. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons License Journal of Creative Space by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://cs.chitkara.edu.in/