Klinik Kullanım Sonrası Reciproc Blue R25 NiTi Eğelerindeki Defektlerin İncelenmesi

Öznur Eraslan

doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1239702

Araştırma Makalesi

Klinik Kullanım Sonrası Reciproc Blue R25 NiTi Eğelerindeki Defektlerin İncelenmesi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 224 - 229, 15.06.2023

Öznur Eraslan

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1239702

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, tek bir endodontist tarafından kullanılan Reciproc Blue R25 NiTi aletlerdeki kırık ve deformasyon tiplerini stereomikroskop ve taramalı elektron mikroskobu ile analiz etmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada yaklaşık olarak 4 aylık bir dönemde endodonti kliniğinde 5 molar dişte tek bir endodontist tarafından kullanılmış ve imha edilmek üzere ayrılmış 47 adet Reciproc Blue R25 NiTi alet kullanıldı. Ultrasonik olarak temizlenip, otoklavlanan aletler deformasyon ve kırıkları belirlemek için stereomikroskopta x2,5 ve x4 büyütmede incelendi. Deformasyon şekilleri 1:Kırık, 2:Eğenin yivlerinin açılması/burulması, 3:Sağlam (gözle görülür bir defekt yok) şeklinde sınıflandırıldı. Kırılan eğeler torsiyonel ve fleksural kırılma olarak iki alt grupta sınıflandırıldı. Kırılan ve deforme olan aletler longitudinal ve fraktografik olarak SEM’de incelendi.
Bulgular: Stereomikroskopta incelenen toplam 47 Reciproc Blue R25 eğenin % 6,3’ünde (3) kırık gözlendi, % 86,3’nde gözle görülür bir deformasyon gözlenmedi, % 4,2’ sinde torsiyonal, % 2,1’inde fleksural kırık gözlendi.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın limitasyonları dahilinde, Reciproc Blue R25 eğesinin tek bir endodontist tarafından 5 molar dişe kadar kullanımında kırılma riski düşük bulunmuştur.
Anahtar kelimeler: Deformasyon, NiTi eğeler, Kırık, Klinik kullanım

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deformasyon, NiTi eğeler, Kırık, Klinik kullanım

Destekleyen Kurum

finansal destek bulunmamaktadır

Kaynakça

1. Spanaki-Voreadi AP, Kerezoudis NP, Zinelis S. Failure mechanism of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. Int Endod J 2006;39:171–8.
2. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, et al. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161–5.
3. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Tripi V, et al. Defects in GT rotary instruments after use: an SEM study. J Endod 2001;27:782–5.
4. Peng B, Shen Y, Cheung GSP, et al. ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: a longitudinal examination. Int Endod J 2005;38:550–7.
5. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, et al. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32:61–5.
6. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, et al. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2007;33:276–9.
7. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2006;32:55–7.
8. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:183– 6.
9. Cheung GSP, Peng B, Shen Y, Darvell BW. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endo J 2005;38:802–9.
10. Varela Patino P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, et al. Alternating versus contin- uous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36: 157–9.
11. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, et al. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with recip- rocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1991–4.
12. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used inreciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010;43: 1063–8.
13. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39:258–61
14. Keleş A, Eymirli A, Uyanık O, et al. Influence of static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests on the lifespan of four reciprocating systems at different temperatures. Int Endod J 2019;52:880–6.
15. Maki K, Ebihara A, Kimura S, et al. Enhanced root canal-centering ability and reduced screw-in force generation of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with a post-machining thermal treatment. Dent Mater J 2020;39:251–5.
16. Inan, U., & Gonulol, N. (2009). Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Journal of endodontics, 35(10), 1396-1399.
17. Thu, M., Ebihara, A., Maki, K., Miki, N., & Okiji, T. (2020). Cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments subjected to static and dynamic tests. Journal of endodontics, 46(11), 1752-1757.
18. Yılmaz A, Gökyay SS, Dağlaroğlu R, Karagöz Küçükay I. Evaluation of deformation and fracture rates for nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the frequency of clinical use. Eur Oral Res 2018; 52(2): 89-93.
19. Shen Y, Coil JM, Zhou H, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M. HyFlex nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: metallurgical properties. International Endodontic Journal, 46, 720–729, 2013.
20. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. Int Endod J 2001;34:386–9.
21. Cheung GSP. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcome. Endod Topics 2009;16:1–26.
22. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32:1031–43.
23. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002;35:7–12.
24. Shen, Y., Coil, J. M., Mo, A. J., Wang, Z., Hieawy, A., Yang, Y., & Haapasalo, M. (2016). WaveOne rotary instruments after clinical use. Journal of endodontics, 42(2), 186-18
25. De-Deus, G., Cardoso, M. L., Belladonna, F. G., Cavalcante, D. M., Simões-Carvalho, M., Souza, E. M., ... & Silva, E. J. N. L. (2019). Performance of Reciproc blue R25 instruments in shaping the canal space without glide path. Journal of endodontics, 45(2), 194-198.
26. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schafer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Interna- tional Endodontic Journal, 45, 449–461, 2012.
27. Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GTM, Kawakami DAS. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod 2012;38:684-687.
28. Park SK, Kim YJ, Shon WJ, You SY, Moon YM, Kim HC, et al.. Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy. Scanning 2014;36:246–251.
29. Caballero H, Rivera F, Salas H. Scanning electron microscopy of superficial defects in twisted files and Reciproc nickel-titanium files after use in extracted molars. Int Endod J 2014; Epub ahead of print.
30. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 Pro- Taper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010;43:1063–8.
31. Kiefner P, Ban M, De-Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments? Int Endod J 2014;47:430–6.
32. Tokita D, Ebihara A, Miyara K, Okiji T. Dynamic torsional and cyclic fracture behavior of profile rotary instruments at continuous or reciprocating rotation as visualized with high-speed digital video imaging. J Endod 2017;43: 1337–42.
33. Plotino G, Grande NM, Porciani PF. Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical evaluation. Int Endod J 2015;48:199–205.
34. Rodrigues E, De-Deus G, Souza E, Silva EJ. Safe mechanical preparation with recip- rocation movement without glide path creation: result from a pool of 673 root canals. Braz Dent J 2016;27:22–7.
35. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT, et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017;43:462–6.
36. Topcuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc files in an s-shaped canal. J Endod 2017;43:1679–82.
37. Silva EJ, Vieira VT, Gabina TT, et al. The impact of using a pneumatic contra-angle device on the lifespan of M-Wire- and Blue-treated instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018
38. Silva EJ, Hecksher F, Antunes HD, et al. Torsional fatigue resistance of blue-treated reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2018;44:1038–41.
39. Pirani C, Paolucci A, Ruggeri O, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Gatto MR, Gandolfi MG, Prati C. Wear and metallographic analysis of WaveOne and reciproc NiTi instruments before and after three uses in root canals. Scanning. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):517-25.
40. Duque, J. A., Bramante, C. M., Duarte, M. A. H., Alcalde, M. P., Silva, E. J. N. L., & Vivan, R. R. (2020). Cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments after simulated clinical use. Journal of Endodontics, 46(11), 1771-1775.
41. Caballero, H., Rivera, F., & Salas, H. (2015). Scanning electron microscopy of superficial defects in T wisted files and Reciproc nickel–titanium files after use in extracted molars. International endodontic journal, 48(3), 229-235.

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 224 - 229, 15.06.2023

Öznur Eraslan

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1239702

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deformasyon, NiTi eğeler, Kırık, Klinik kullanım

Kaynakça

1. Spanaki-Voreadi AP, Kerezoudis NP, Zinelis S. Failure mechanism of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. Int Endod J 2006;39:171–8.
2. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, et al. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161–5.
3. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Tripi V, et al. Defects in GT rotary instruments after use: an SEM study. J Endod 2001;27:782–5.
4. Peng B, Shen Y, Cheung GSP, et al. ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: a longitudinal examination. Int Endod J 2005;38:550–7.
5. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, et al. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32:61–5.
6. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, et al. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2007;33:276–9.
7. Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2006;32:55–7.
8. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:183– 6.
9. Cheung GSP, Peng B, Shen Y, Darvell BW. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endo J 2005;38:802–9.
10. Varela Patino P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, et al. Alternating versus contin- uous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36: 157–9.
11. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, et al. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with recip- rocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1991–4.
12. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used inreciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010;43: 1063–8.
13. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39:258–61
14. Keleş A, Eymirli A, Uyanık O, et al. Influence of static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests on the lifespan of four reciprocating systems at different temperatures. Int Endod J 2019;52:880–6.
15. Maki K, Ebihara A, Kimura S, et al. Enhanced root canal-centering ability and reduced screw-in force generation of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with a post-machining thermal treatment. Dent Mater J 2020;39:251–5.
16. Inan, U., & Gonulol, N. (2009). Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Journal of endodontics, 35(10), 1396-1399.
17. Thu, M., Ebihara, A., Maki, K., Miki, N., & Okiji, T. (2020). Cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments subjected to static and dynamic tests. Journal of endodontics, 46(11), 1752-1757.
18. Yılmaz A, Gökyay SS, Dağlaroğlu R, Karagöz Küçükay I. Evaluation of deformation and fracture rates for nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the frequency of clinical use. Eur Oral Res 2018; 52(2): 89-93.
19. Shen Y, Coil JM, Zhou H, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M. HyFlex nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: metallurgical properties. International Endodontic Journal, 46, 720–729, 2013.
20. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. Int Endod J 2001;34:386–9.
21. Cheung GSP. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcome. Endod Topics 2009;16:1–26.
22. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32:1031–43.
23. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002;35:7–12.
24. Shen, Y., Coil, J. M., Mo, A. J., Wang, Z., Hieawy, A., Yang, Y., & Haapasalo, M. (2016). WaveOne rotary instruments after clinical use. Journal of endodontics, 42(2), 186-18
25. De-Deus, G., Cardoso, M. L., Belladonna, F. G., Cavalcante, D. M., Simões-Carvalho, M., Souza, E. M., ... & Silva, E. J. N. L. (2019). Performance of Reciproc blue R25 instruments in shaping the canal space without glide path. Journal of endodontics, 45(2), 194-198.
26. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schafer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Interna- tional Endodontic Journal, 45, 449–461, 2012.
27. Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GTM, Kawakami DAS. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod 2012;38:684-687.
28. Park SK, Kim YJ, Shon WJ, You SY, Moon YM, Kim HC, et al.. Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy. Scanning 2014;36:246–251.
29. Caballero H, Rivera F, Salas H. Scanning electron microscopy of superficial defects in twisted files and Reciproc nickel-titanium files after use in extracted molars. Int Endod J 2014; Epub ahead of print.
30. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 Pro- Taper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010;43:1063–8.
31. Kiefner P, Ban M, De-Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments? Int Endod J 2014;47:430–6.
32. Tokita D, Ebihara A, Miyara K, Okiji T. Dynamic torsional and cyclic fracture behavior of profile rotary instruments at continuous or reciprocating rotation as visualized with high-speed digital video imaging. J Endod 2017;43: 1337–42.
33. Plotino G, Grande NM, Porciani PF. Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical evaluation. Int Endod J 2015;48:199–205.
34. Rodrigues E, De-Deus G, Souza E, Silva EJ. Safe mechanical preparation with recip- rocation movement without glide path creation: result from a pool of 673 root canals. Braz Dent J 2016;27:22–7.
35. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT, et al. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017;43:462–6.
36. Topcuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc files in an s-shaped canal. J Endod 2017;43:1679–82.
37. Silva EJ, Vieira VT, Gabina TT, et al. The impact of using a pneumatic contra-angle device on the lifespan of M-Wire- and Blue-treated instruments. Clin Oral Investig 2018
38. Silva EJ, Hecksher F, Antunes HD, et al. Torsional fatigue resistance of blue-treated reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2018;44:1038–41.
39. Pirani C, Paolucci A, Ruggeri O, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Gatto MR, Gandolfi MG, Prati C. Wear and metallographic analysis of WaveOne and reciproc NiTi instruments before and after three uses in root canals. Scanning. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):517-25.
40. Duque, J. A., Bramante, C. M., Duarte, M. A. H., Alcalde, M. P., Silva, E. J. N. L., & Vivan, R. R. (2020). Cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments after simulated clinical use. Journal of Endodontics, 46(11), 1771-1775.
41. Caballero, H., Rivera, F., & Salas, H. (2015). Scanning electron microscopy of superficial defects in T wisted files and Reciproc nickel–titanium files after use in extracted molars. International endodontic journal, 48(3), 229-235.

Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Konular	Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm	Araştırma
Yazarlar	Öznur Eraslan 0000-0002-0743-1677
Yayımlanma Tarihi	15 Haziran 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi	23 Ocak 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver	Eraslan Ö. Klinik Kullanım Sonrası Reciproc Blue R25 NiTi Eğelerindeki Defektlerin İncelenmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2023;10(4):224-9.

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin

Selcuk Dental Journal Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.