Abstract
In recent years the trope of invisibility has emerged as a critical concept in the humanities; initially associated with the issue of racial invisibility, it has been applied to all forms of marginalisation, be they racial, social, or political. Today, the context of hypervisibility, which results from intensive media coverage of certain events, has made discussing invisibility paradoxical. This article seeks to reassess invisibility as a key concept in the humanities and discusses the scopic power of literature to make the unseen visible. This will be approached via discussion of contemporary narratives dealing with disappearance and loss, with a particular focus on the literature of the middle passage.
References
Abraham, N., and M. Torok. (1987) 1994. The Shell and the Kernel. Vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Boime, A. 1990. “Turner’s Slave Ship: The Victims of Empire.” In Turner Studies His Art & Epoch 1775–1851, Vol. 10, 34–43.Search in Google Scholar
Breman, J. 1996. Footloose Labor, Working in India’s Informal Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171076Search in Google Scholar
Crépon, M. 2018. Inhumaines Conditions. Combattre l’intolérable. Paris: Odile Jacob.Search in Google Scholar
D’Aguiar, F. 1997. Feeding the Ghosts. London: Chatto & Windus.Search in Google Scholar
Debord, G. (1967) 1994. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.Search in Google Scholar
Ellison, R. (1952) 1965. Invisible Man. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1952) 1986. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by C. L. Markmann. London: Pluto.Search in Google Scholar
Hartman, S. 2007. Lose Your Mother. A Journey Along The Atlantic Slave Route. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
Karpinski, E. 2018. “Moving the Bones: Multilingual Plasticity in Marlene NourbeSe Philip’s Zong!” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 45 (4): 639–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/crc.2018.0066.Search in Google Scholar
Král, F. 2014. Social Invisibility and Diasporas in Anglophone Literature and Culture: The Fractal Gaze. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137401397Search in Google Scholar
Le Blanc, G. 2014. L’Insurrection des vies minuscules. Paris: Bayard.Search in Google Scholar
Levi, P. (1947) 1959. If This is a Man. Translated by S. Woolf. New York: Orion Press.Search in Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. L’oeil et l’Esprit. Paris: Gallimard.10.1522/030824586Search in Google Scholar
Olusoga, D. 2016. Black and British: A Forgotten History. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Ong, A. 1997. “The Gender and Labor Politics of Postmodernity.” In The Politics of Culture in the Shadow of Capital, edited by L. Lowe, and D. Lloyd, 61–97. London: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11smp8b.6Search in Google Scholar
Philip NourbeSe, M. 2008. Zong! As Told to the Author by Setaey Adamu Boateng. Toronto: The Mercury Press.Search in Google Scholar
Renault, E. 2008. Souffrances sociales. Philosophie, psychologie et politique. Paris: La Découverte.10.3917/dec.renau.2008.01Search in Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. 2014. Le parlement des invisibles. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Roy, A. 1997. The God of Small Things. London: Flamingo.Search in Google Scholar
Roy, A. 1999. The Cost of Living. London: Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Roy, A. 2017. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. London/New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Sharpe, J. 2014. “The Archive and Affective Memory in M. NourbeSe Philip’s Zong!” Interventions 16 (4): 465–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2013.816079.Search in Google Scholar
Sharpe, C. 2016. In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. London: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822373452Search in Google Scholar
Walcott, D. 2007. Selected Poems. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
