Phonology to the rescue: Nez Perce morphology revisited

References

Alderete, John. 2001. Morphologically governed accent in optimality theory. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou Elena & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Allen, Margaret R. 1978. Morphological investigations. Storrs, Connecticut: University of Connecticut PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Aoki, Haruo. 1970. Nez Perce grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aoki, Haruo. 1979. Nez Perce texts. Volume 90 of University of California Publications in Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aoki, Haruo. 1994. Nez Perce dictionary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aoki, Haruo & Edward E. Walker. 1988. Nez Perce oral narratives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-3889-8Search in Google Scholar

Bar-el, Leora & Linda Tamburri Watt. 1998. What determines stress in Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish)? In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Salishan and Neighboring Languages, 407–427. Seattle: University of Washington.Search in Google Scholar

Bat-El, Outi. 1996. Selecting the best of the worst: The grammar of Hebrew blends. Phonology 13. 283–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700002657.Search in Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2012. The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 8–83. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2013. The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional features. Probus 25(3-103). https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. 2010. Morphology and stress in Nez Perce verbs. In Beth Rogers & Anita Szakay (eds.), Workshop on structure and constituency in the languages of the Americas (WSCLA), 15, vol. 29, 70–84. Available at: http://lingserver.arts.ubc.ca/linguistics/sites/default/files/UBCWPL29-WSCLA15-Bjorkman_0.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 35–71.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2007. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Software version 4.6.09.Search in Google Scholar

Bogomolets, Ksenia. 2020. Lexical Accent in Languages with Complex Morphology. Storrs, Connecticut: University of Connecticut PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulalia & Daniel Harbour. 2012. Contextual allomorphy. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 195–235. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Bowman, Sam. 2012. Building OT grammars in PyPhon. Unpublished Tutorial.Search in Google Scholar

Božič, Jurij. 2019. Constraining long-distance allomorphy. The Linguistic Review 36(3). 485–505.10.1515/tlr-2019-2031Search in Google Scholar

Bye, Patrik & Peter Svenonius. 2012. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 427–495. OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs, Andrew. 1980. Constraints on allomorphy in inflexion. London: University of London PhD thesis. Reprinted IULC 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Christopoulos, Christos & Roberto Petrosino. 2018. Greek root-allomorphy without spans. In Wm. G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Coelho, Gail. 2002. Conflicting directionality in Thompson River Salish. Rutgers Optimality Archive 569. Available at: http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/569-1202/569-1202-COELHO-0-0.PDF.Search in Google Scholar

Coetzee, Andries. 2006. Variation as accessing ‘non-optimal’ candidates. Phonology 23. 337–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675706000984.Search in Google Scholar

Crook, Harold. 1999. The Phonology and Morphology of Nez Perce Stress. Los Angeles: UCLA PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 1993. Cyclicity and stress in Moses-Columbia Salish (Nxaamxcin). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11. 197–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992914.Search in Google Scholar

de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Deal, Amy Rose & Matthew Wolf. 2017. Outward-sensitive phonologically conditioned allomorphy in Nez Perce. In Vera Gribanova & Stephanie Shih (eds.), The morphosyntax-phonology connection: Locality and directionality at the interface, 29–60. New York: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210304.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Dybo, Vladimir. 2011. Značenie zapadnokavkazskoj akcentnoj sistemy dlja izučenija balto-slavjanskoj i japonskix akcentnyx sistem. [The significance of the West Caucasian accent system for the study of the Balto-Slavic and Japanese accent systems]. In Tijmen Pronk & Rick Derksen (eds.), Accent matters: Papers on Balto-Slavic accentology. New York: Rodopi.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2015. The morpheme. Boston/Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501502569Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2017. On the targets of phonological realization. In Vera Gribanova & Stephanie Shih (eds.), The morphosyntax-phonology connection: Locality and directionality at the interface. New York: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210304.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Morris Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo von Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003, vol. 37–62, 37–62. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.270.03embSearch in Google Scholar

Enguehard, Emile, Edward Flemming & Giorgio Magri. 2018. Statistical learning theory and linguistic typology: A learnability perspective on OT’s strict domination. In Gaja Jarosz, Brendan O’Connor & Pater Joe (eds.), Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Society for Computation in Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Golston, Chris. 1996. Direct Optimality Theory: Representation as pure markedness. Language 72(4). 713–748. https://doi.org/10.2307/416100.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 2001. On accent, stress, and quantity in West Slavic. Lingua 111. 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(00)00050-4.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Paul Kiparsky. 1977. Towards a reconstruction of the Indo-European accent. In Larry Hyman (ed.), Studies in Stress and Accent, University of Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 209–238. University fo Southern California.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hargus, Sharon. 1993. Modeling the phonology-morphology interface. In Sharon Hargus & Sharon Inkelas (eds.), Studies in Lexical Phonology, 45–71. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-325071-1.50008-XSearch in Google Scholar

Hargus, Sharon, Noel Rude & Virginia Beavert. 2015. Obviative allomorphy in Nez Perce. In Eulàlia Bonet, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró (eds.), Understanding allomorphy: Perspectives from optimality theory. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Carl H. 1971. The morphophonology of Asurini words. In David Bendor-Samuel (ed.), Tupi Studies, vol. I, 21–71. Norman, Oklahoma: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, Jason. 2016. Readjustment: Rejected? In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 303–342. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.11hauSearch in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1986. Inalterability in CV phonology. Language 62(2). 321–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/414676.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce, Bruce Tesar & Kie Zuraw. 2017. OTSoft: Optimality theory software 2.5. Available at: https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/otsoft/.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. & Kenneth C. Hill. 1968. Stress in the Cupan (Uto-Aztecan) languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 34(4). 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1086/465023.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, Elizabeth, Jennifer Muller & Aone van Engelenhoven. 1997. Nonmoraic geminates in Leti. Phonology 14(3). 371–402.10.1017/S0952675798003467Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. & C. Orhan Orgun. 2005. Endocyclicity and paradigm non-uniformity. In C. Orhan Orgun & Sells Peter (eds.), Morphology and the web of grammar: Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon. 2017. The directionality and locality of allomorphic conditioning in Optimal Construction Morphology. In Vera Gribanova & Stephanie Shih (eds.), The morphosyntax-phonology connection: Locality and directionality at the interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210304.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Itô, Junko, Armin Mester & Jaye Padgett. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4). 571–613.Search in Google Scholar

Kallulli, Dalina. 2007. Rethinking the passive/anticausative distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.770.Search in Google Scholar

Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana, Heather Newell, Máire Noonan & Lisa Travis. 2016. Phase domains at PF: Root suppletion and its implications. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 121–161. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.05kilSearch in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In In-Sook Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1984. Lexical phonology of Sanskrit word accent. In Amrtādhāra: R.N. Dandekar felicitation volume, 201–210. Delhi: Ajanta Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1996. Allomorphy and morphophonology. In Raj Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy’s orphan. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.144.06kipSearch in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Aspect and event structure in Vedic. In Raj Singh (ed.), Yearbook of South Asian Studies, Vol. 1, 29–61. London: Sage Publications.10.1515/9783110245233.29Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 2010. Compositional vs. paradigmatic approaches to accent and ablaut. In Stephanie W. Jamison, H.Melchert Craig & Vine Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st UCLA Indo-European Conference, 137–82. Bremen: Hempen.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 2020. Morphological units: Stems. In Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.542Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1995. “Cat” as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2013. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In O. Matushansky & A. Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 2000. Harmonic Serialism and parallelism. In NELS 30. North East Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Alan S. Prince. 1993. Prosodic morphology I, constraint interaction and satisfaction. To appear, MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James. 1968. The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Melvold, Janis. 1990. Structure and stress in the phonology of Russian. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2). 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00182.Search in Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-3719-2Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2020. Inflectional morphology in Harmonic Serialism. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, Scott. 1997. OCP effects in Optimality Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15(4). 847–892.10.1002/9780470756171.ch13Search in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. In Marc van Oostendorp, Keren Rice Colin Ewen & Elizabeth Hume (ed.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4, chapter 99. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0099Search in Google Scholar

Ostrove, Jason. 2020. Adjacency and case morphology in Scottish Gaelic. Linguistic Inquiry 51(3). 521–552.10.1162/ling_a_00344Search in Google Scholar

Paster, Mary. 2005. Subcategorization vs. output optimization in syllable-counting allomorphy. In Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 326–333.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, J. Joseph & Bert Vaux. 2018. Vedic Sanskrit accentuation and readjustment rules. In Roberto Petrosino, Pietro Cerrone & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), From sounds to structures: Beyond the veil of Maya, 266–294. de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501506734-009Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1979. Russian morphology and lexical theory. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Russian-morphology-and-lexical-theory-Pesetsky/2db387af28cf356d6fc525e7e99872929197f910.Search in Google Scholar

Poser, William. 1985. The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Potts, Christopher & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. Model theory and the content of OT constraints. Phonology 19(3). 361–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675703004408.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Piscateway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Revised version published 2004 by Blackwell. Page references to the 2004 version.10.1002/9780470759400Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1992. A misconceived approach to morphology. Proceedings of WCCFL 10. 387–98.Search in Google Scholar

Revithiadou, Anthi, Giorgos Markopoulos & Vassilios Spyropoulos. 2019. Changing shape according to strength: Evidence from root allomorphy in Greek. The Linguistic Review 36(3). 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2029.Search in Google Scholar

Riggle, Jason. 2009. The complexity of ranking hypotheses in Optimality Theory. Computational Linguistics 35(1). 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.07-031-r2-06-98.Search in Google Scholar

Riggle, Jason, Max Bane & Samuel R. Bowman. 2011. PyPhon: Software for implementing optimization-based models of grammar.Search in Google Scholar

Rivero, María-Luisa. 1990. The location of nonactive voice in Albanian and modern Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 135–146.Search in Google Scholar

Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse. Eugene: University of Oregon PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Schein, Barry & Donca Steriade. 1986. On geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 691–744.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, Patricia A., Susan J. Blake, Jill Campbell & Cody Shepherd. 1999. Stress in Heemie (Musqueam) Salish. In M. Caldecott, S. Gessner & E. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of WSCLA 4 1999. Vancouver: UBCWPL 2.Search in Google Scholar

Siddiqi, Daniel. 2009. Syntax within the word: Economy, allomorphy, and argument selection in distributed morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.138Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English morphology. Cambridge, MA: Garland Press, New York 1979 PhD thesis, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2016. How are words related? In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 1–26. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.01speSearch in Google Scholar

Staubs, Robert, Michael Becker, Christopher Potts, Patrick Pratt, John J. McCarthy & Pater Joe. 2010. OT-Help 2.0.Search in Google Scholar

Stiebels, Barbara. 2006. Agent focus in Mayan languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24. 501–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-0539-9.Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, Steven. 1982. Lexicalist phonology of English and German. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110846287Search in Google Scholar

Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486333Search in Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2016. Spans and words. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 201–222. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.07sveSearch in Google Scholar

Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky. 1998. Learnability in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 229–268. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553734.Search in Google Scholar

Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky. 2000. Learnability in optimality theory. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4159.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Trigo, Lauren. 1992. Abkhaz stress shift. In Caucasian perspectives. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Trommer, Jochen. 2011. Phonological aspects of Western Nilotic mutation morphology. Leipzig: University of Leipzig PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Trommer, Jochen. 2015a. Lexical insertion occurs in the phonological component. In Eulàlia Bonet, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró (eds.), Syllable-counting allomorphy by prosodic templates. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Trommer, Jochen. 2015b. Moraic affixes and morphological colors in Dinka. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00176.Search in Google Scholar

Tsimpli, Ianthi M. 2006. The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as native and second language. In Antonella Sorace Sharon Unsworth, Teresa Parodi & Martha Young-Scholten (eds.), Paths of development in L1 and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/lald.39.03tsiSearch in Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2006. Suppletion in verb paradigms: Bits and pieces of the puzzle. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.67Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Matthew. 2013. Candidate chains, unfaithful spell-out, and outwards-looking phonologically-conditioned allomorphy. Morphology 23. 145–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9219-3.Search in Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter. 1996. Minimalist Morphology: The role of paradigms. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_6Search in Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter. 2001. How gaps and substitutions can become optimal: The pronominal affix paradigms of Yimas. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2). 315–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.00084.Search in Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter & Ray Fabri. 1994. Minimalist Morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 20. 236–294.10.1515/zfsw.1995.14.2.236Search in Google Scholar