Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg May 2, 2018

Health Disparities for Immigrants: Theory and Evidence from Canada

  • Laetitia Lebihan , Charles Olivier Mao Takongmo EMAIL logo and Fanny McKellips
From the journal Review of Economics

Abstract

Few empirical studies have been conducted to analyse the disparities in health variables affecting immigrants in a given country. To our knowledge, no theoretical analysis has been conducted to explain health disparities for immigrants between regions in the same country that differs in term of languages spoken and income. In this paper, we use the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) to compare multiple health measures among immigrants in Quebec, immigrants in the rest of Canada and Canadian-born individuals. We propose a simple structural model and conduct an empirical analysis in order to assess possible channels that can explain the health disparities for immigrants between two regions of the same country. Our results show that well-being and health indicators worsen significantly for immigrants in Quebec, compared to their counterparts in the rest of Canada and Canadian-born individuals. Additional econometric analysis also shows that life satisfaction is statistically and significantly associated with health outcomes. The proposed structural model predicts that, when the decision to migrate to a particular area is based on income alone, and if the fixed costs associated with the language barrier are large, immigrants may face health issues.

JEL Classification: I14; I30; J10

Appendix

Table A.1:

Well-Being and Health Measures (CCHS).

Overall healthIn general, would you say your health is:
(Range: 1–5)(1) poor
(2) fair
(3) good
(4) very good
(5) excellent
Mental healthIn general, would you say your mental health is:
(Range: 1–5)(1) poor
(2) fair
(3) good
(4) very good
(5) excellent
Life satisfactionHow satisfied are you with your life in general:
(Range: 1–5)(1) very dissatisfied
(2) dissatisfied
(3) neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
(4) satisfied
(5) very satisfied
Oral healthIn general, would you say the health of your teeth and mouth is:
(Range: 1–5)(1) poor
(2) fair
(3) good
(4) very good
(5) excellent
Drinking- Type of drinkingDuring the past 12 months, have you had beer, wine, liquor or any other alcoholic beverage?:
(Range: 1–3)(1) Not at all
(2) Occasionally (less than once a month)
(3) Regularly (once a month to every day)
SmokingType of smoker:
(Range: 1–3)(1) Not at all
(2) Occasionally (less than once a month)
(3) Regularly (once a month to every day)
Daily consumptionTotal fruits and vegetables:
The CCHS measures the number of times (frequency), not the amount consumed.
Table A.2:

Summary Statistics.

Quebec(1)Rest of Canada(2)(1)–(2)
ImmigrantNon-immigrantDifferenceImmigrantNon-immigrantDifferenceProb>Chi2
Imm-Non immImm-Non imm
lSex
Male0.528 (0.499)0.497 (0.500)0.030 (0.012)0.486 (0.500)0.501 (0.499)-0.016 (0.005)0.000
lAge
20–240.080 (0.272)0.121 (0.326)-0.040 (0.007)0.086 (0.280)0.134 (0.340)-0.048 (0.003)0.309
25–290.117 (0.321)0.117 (0.321)-0.001 (0.007)0.095 (0.293)0.127 (0.332)-0.031 (0.003)0.000
30–340.161 (0.367)0.109 (0.312)0.052 (0.008)0.109 (0.312)0.114 (0.318)-0.005 (0.003)0.000
35–390.162 (0.368)0.112 (0.315)0.050 (0.008)0.142 (0.349)0.122 (0.328)0.020 (0.003) 0.000
40–440.144 (0.352)0.138 (0.345)0.006 (0.008)0.163 (0.369)0.141 (0.347)0.023 (0.004)0.067
45–490.119 (0.324)0.139 (0.346)-0.020 (0.009)0.142 (0.349)0.136 (0.343)0.006 (0.004)0.006
50–540.109 (0.312)0.143 (0.350)-0.034 (0.008)0.131 (0.338)0.123 (0.328)0.009 (0.003)0.000
55–590.108 (0.310)0.122 (0.327)-0.014 (0.008)0.131 (0.337)0.103 (0.304)0.027 (0.003)0.000
lHousehold size
1 person0.131 (0.337)0.146 (0.349)-0.011 (0.006)0.081 (0.272)0.110 (0.313)-0.029 0.002)0.002
2 persons0.248 (0.432)0.333 (0.471)-0.086 (0.009)0.214 (0.410)0.303 (0.459)-0.089 (0.003)0.713
3 persons0.233 (0.423)0.221 (0.415)0.012 (0.010)0.220 (0.414)0.218 (0.413)0.002 (0.004)0.375
4 persons0.230 (0.421)0.211 (0.408)0.019 (0.011)0.270 (0.444)0.241 (0.427)0.029 (0.005)0.381
5 + persons0.159 (0.366)0.093 (0.291)0.066 (0.009)0.216 (0.412)0.129 (0.335)0.087 (0.004)0.037
  1. (continued)

Table A.2:

(continued)

Quebec(1)Rest of Canada(2)(1)–(2)
ImmigrantNon-immigrantDifferenceImmigrantNon-immigrantDifferenceProb>Chi2
Imm-Non immImm-Non imm
lHighest level of education attained
Less than high school0.106 (0.308)0.135 (0.342)-0.029 (0.008)0.090 (0.286)0.097 (0.296)-0.007 (0.003)0.010
High school diploma0.108 (0.310)0.136 (0.343)-0.029 (0.008)0.169 (0.375)0.193 (0.395)-0.024 (0.004)0.560
Some college0.047 (0.212)0.069 (0.254)-0.022 (0.005)0.072 (0.258)0.099 (0.298)-0.027 (0.003)0.409
Bachelor’s and above0.739 (0.244)0.659 (0.474)0.080 (0.011)0.669 (0.471)0.611 (0.488)0.058 (0.005)0.064
Marital status
Married/common-law0.689 (0.463)0.638 (0.481)0.051 (0.011)0.731 (0.443)0.648 (0.478)0.084 (0.004)0.004
Single/never married0.214 (0.410)0.269 (0.443)-0.055 (0.009)0.188 (0.391)0.268 (0.444)-0.080 (0.004)0.011
Widowed/divorced/separated0.098 (0.297)0.093 (0.291)0.005 (0.007)0.081 (0.272)0.084 (0.277)-0.004 (0.002)0.266
lLanguage in which the respondent can converse
English0.152 (0.359)0.016 (0.126)0.136 (0.009)0.857 (0.350)0.839 (0.367)0.018 (0.003)0.000
French0.245 (0.430)0.486 (0.500)-0.242 (0.010)0.110 (0.033)0.004 (0.060)-0.003 (0.000)0.000
English and French0.565 (0.496)0.497 (0.500)0.069 (0.012)0.079 (0.270)0.155 (0.362)-0.076 (0.003)0.000
Neither0.038 (0.190)0.080 (0.028)0.037 (0.006)0.063 (0.243)0.020 (0.045)0.061 (0.002)0.000
N4,59953,70333,348193,665
  1. Notes: This table displays the weighted (sample weights from Statistics Canada) summary statistics for independent variables. The statistics are presented by region, Quebec and the rest of Canada, for immigrants and non-immigrants. Standard deviations are in parentheses (standard errors for the Differences columns). ***: significant at 1% ; **: significant at 5% ; *: significant at 10%.

Acknowledgements:

We wish to thank Professor Jean-Marie Dufour, Professor Steven Ambler, Professor Victoria Zinde-Walsh, Professor Kristian Behrens, Professor Prosper Dovonon, Professor Catherine Haeck, Professor Philip Merrigan, Professor Pierre Lefebvre, Professor Marie Connolly, the anonymous referees, and the editor for comments and suggestions.

References

Beiser, M. (2005): The Health of Immigrants and Refugees in Canada, Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique, S30–S44.10.1007/BF03403701Search in Google Scholar

Boudarbat, B. and M. Connolly (2013): Évolution de l’ accès à l’emploi et des conditions de travail des immigrants au Québec, en Ontario et en Colombie - Britannique entre 2006 et 2012 (No. 2013s-28). CIRANO.Search in Google Scholar

Boulet, M. and B. Boudarbat (2015a): Qualité de l’emploi et santé mentale des travailleurs au Québec: une comparaison entre les immigrants et les natifs, Canadian Public Policy 41(2),S53–S60.10.3138/cpp.2014-074Search in Google Scholar

Boulet, M. and B. Boudarbat (2015b): The Economic Performance of Immigrants with Canadian Education, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies 15(2),23–40.Search in Google Scholar

Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P. and Richardson, D. (2007): An Index of Child Well-Being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research 80(1),133–177.10.1007/978-1-4020-9304-3_16Search in Google Scholar

Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2016): How Canada Compares: Results From The Commonwealth Fund 2015 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians, https://www.cihi.ca/en/health-system-performance/performance-reporting/international/commonwealth-fund-survey-2015 accessed December 2, 2017).(Search in Google Scholar

De Maio, F. G. and E. Kemp (2010): The Deterioration of Health Status Among Immigrants to Canada. Global Public Health 5(5),462–478.10.1080/17441690902942480Search in Google Scholar

Flegel, K., N. MacDonald and P. Hebert C. (2011): Binge Drinking: All Too Prevalent and Hazardous. CMAJ 183(4), 411.10.1503/cmaj.110029Search in Google Scholar

Gee, E. M. T., K. M. Kobayashi and S. G. Prus (2004): Examining the Healthy Immigrant Effect in Mid-to Later Life: Findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey, Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement 23(5),S55–S63.10.1353/cja.2005.0032Search in Google Scholar

Government of Canada (1984): Canada Health Act, http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-6/page-1.html (accessed December 2, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Government of Canada (2002): Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (SOR/2002-227), http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/20060322/P1TT3xt3.html (accessed June 10, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Government of Canada (2017): Medical Exam for Permanent Residents, http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/medical/medexams-perm.asp accessed June( 10, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Mao Takongmo, C. O. (2017a): Government-Spending Multipliers and the Zero Lower Bound in an Open Economy. Review of International Economics 25(5),1046–1077.10.1111/roie.12295Search in Google Scholar

Mao Takongmo, C. O. (2017b): Government Spending, GDP and Exchange Rate in Zero Lower Bound: Measuring Causality at Multiple Horizons. MPRA Working Paper No. 79703.Search in Google Scholar

Statistics Canada (2005): Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)- Main file.Search in Google Scholar

Statistics Canada. (2011): Immigration and Ethnocultural Diversity in Canada. National Household survey, 2001, Catalogue no. 99-010-X2011001.Search in Google Scholar

UNICEF Office of Research (2013): Child Well-Being in Rich Countries: Comparative Overview A. Innocenti Report Card 11, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, L. and Palacios, E. L (2017): The Social and Spatial Patterning of Life Stress Among Immigrants in Canada, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 19(3),665–673.10.1007/s10903-016-0538-4Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-05-02
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

© 2018 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/roe-2017-0029/html
Scroll to top button