Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 18, 2019

Impact of plant growth regulators and soil properties on Miscanthus x giganteus biomass parameters and uptake of metals in military soils

  • Diana Nebeská ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Valentina Pidlisnyuk , Tatyana Stefanovska , Josef Trögl , Pavlo Shapoval , Jan Popelka , Jan Černý , Artem Medkow , Volodymyr Kvak and Hana Malinská

Abstract

The impact of plant growth regulators (PGRs) “Stimpo” and “Regoplant” on Miscanthus x giganteus (Mxg) biomass parameters was investigated when the plant was grown in military soils with different properties from Dolyna, Ukraine and Hradcany, Czech Republic. The results showed that PGRs positively influenced the biomass parameters when the plant was grown in soil in Dolyna with good agricultural characteristics, the influence of “Regoplant” was higher and the best results were obtained with combined treatment: application to rhizomes before planting and spraying on the biomass during vegetation. Using of PGRs did not improve the biomass parameters when the plant was grown in poor soil in Hradcany. In parallel the peculiarities of the metals uptake process were studied for the following metals: chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), strontium (Sr) and lead (Pb). The uptake behavior of the monitored elements differed based on the soil quality. According to the bioconcentration factor uptake of the abiogenic elements, Cr and Pb, was dominant in the plant roots in both soils, whereas Ni was not detected in any plant tissues. The behavior of biogenic elements (Mn, Cu, Zn) and their analogs (Sr) was different. Those elements were more intensively taken up in shoot tissues in low-nutrient sandy Hradcany soils, while they were mainly taken up in plant roots in fertile Dolyna soils. The unusual behavior of biogenic elements in the low-nutrient soils may be explained by the effect of stress. However, more research is needed focused mainly on soil properties and nutrient availability in order to confirm or disprove this hypothesis and to explore the cause of the stress. The summarized results here show that soil properties influenced Mxg biomass parameters, affected the uptake behavior of metals significantly and tested PGRs cannot be utilized universally in the production of Mxg in the poor military soils.

  1. Research funding: Research was supported by North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) SPS MYP G4687, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004415, and Technology Agency of the Czech Republic project DPK/2017/13.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

References

1. Pidlisnyuk V, Stefanovska T, Lewis EE, Erickson LE, Davis LC. Miscanthus as a productive biofuel crop for phytoremediation. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 2014;33(1):1–19.10.1080/07352689.2014.847616Search in Google Scholar

2. Pidlisnyuk VV, Erickson LE, Trögl J, Shapoval PY, Popelka J, Davis LC, et al. Metals uptake behaviour in Miscanthus x giganteus plant during growth at the contaminated soil from the military site in Sliač, Slovakia. Polish J Chem Technol 2018;20(2):1–7.10.2478/pjct-2018-0016Search in Google Scholar

3. Pidlisnyuk V, Trögl J, Stefanovska T, Shapoval P, Erickson L. Preliminary results on growing second generation biofuel crop Miscanthus x giganteus at the polluted military site in Ukraine. Nov Biotechnol Chim 2016;15(1):77–84.10.1515/nbec-2016-0008Search in Google Scholar

4. Hettiarachchi GM, Pierzynski GM. The use of phosphorus and other amendments for in situ stabilization of soil lead. In: Conference on hazardous waste research: environmental challenges and solutions to resource development, production, and use. Denver, CO, USA: Great Plains-Rocky Mountain Hazardous Substance Research Center, 2000:125–33.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kharitonov M, Pidlisnyuk V, Stefanovska T, Babenko M, Martynova N, Rula I. The estimation of Miscanthus x giganteus adaptive potential for cultivation on the mining and post-mining lands in Ukraine. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2019;26(3):2974–86.10.1007/s11356-018-3741-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Ponomarenko SP, Terek OI, Grytsaenko ZM, Babayants OV, Moiseeva ТV, Wenxiu H, et al. Bioregulation of growth and development of plants: plant growth regulators in crop science. In: Ponomarenko SP, Iutynska HO, editors. Bioregulyatsiya mikrobnorastitel’nykh system [Bioregulation of microbial-plant systems]. Kiev, Ukraine: Nichlava; 2010:251–91 [in Russian].Search in Google Scholar

7. Tsygankova VA, Yemets AI, Ponomarenko SP, Matvieieva NA, Chapkevich SE, Kuchuk NV. Increase in the synthesis of polyfructan in the cultures of chicory “hairy roots” with plant natural growth regulators. Int J Biomed 2013;3(2):139–44.Search in Google Scholar

8. Machackova I, Zazimalova E, George E. Plant growth regulators I: introduction; auxins, their analogues and inhibitors. In: George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk G-J, editors. Plant propagation by tissue culture. Berlin: Springer; 2008:175–83.Search in Google Scholar

9. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2012;28(4):1327–50.10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Chen C, Zou J, Zhang S, Zaitlin D, Zhu L. Strigolactones are a new-defined class of plant hormones which inhibit shoot branching and mediate the interaction of plant-AM fungi and plant-parasitic weeds. Sci China Ser C Life Sci 2009;52(8):693–700.10.1007/s11427-009-0104-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Ponomarenko PS, Stefanovska TR, Medkov AI, Kapriy M. Bioregulators of plant development in growing biofuel crops. In: 17th International Scientific Conference “Sakharov Readings: environmental problems of the XXI century”, Part II. Minsk, Belarus: IVTs Minfina, 2017:40–2.Search in Google Scholar

12. Nebeská D, Trögl J, Pidlisnyuk V, Popelka J, Veronesi Dáňová P, Usťak S, et al. Effect of growing Miscanthus x giganteus on soil microbial communities in post-military soil. Sustainability 2018;10(11):4021.10.3390/su10114021Search in Google Scholar

13. Placek-Lapaj A, Grobelak A, Fijalkowski K, Singh BR, Almås ÅR, Kacprzak M. Post – mining soil as carbon storehouse under polish conditions. J Environ Manage 2019;238:307–14.10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Pidlisnyuk V, Erickson L, Stefanovska T, Popelka J, Hettiarachchi G, Davis L, et al. Potential phytomanagement of military polluted sites and biomass production using biofuel crop Miscanthus x giganteus. Environ Pollut 2019;249:330–7.10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Machackova J, Wittlingerova Z, Vlk K, Zima J, Linka A. Comparison of two methods for assessment of in situ jet-fuel remediation efficiency. Water Air Soil Pollut 2007;187(1–4):181–94.10.1007/s11270-007-9507-9Search in Google Scholar

16. DSTU. DSTU ISO 11464-2001: Soil quality. Preliminary preparation of samples for physicalchemical analysis. Kyiv, Ukraine; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. EASC. GOST 26483-85: Soil. Preparation of salt extract and determination of its pH by CINAO method; 1986.Search in Google Scholar

18. DSTU. DSTU 4115-2002: Soils. Determination of dynamic compounds of phosphorus and potassium by the modified method of Chirikov. Kyiv, Ukraine; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

19. EASC. GOST 26487-85: Soils. Determination of exchangeable calcium and exchangeable (mobile) magnesium by CINAO methods. Minsk, Belarus; 1986.Search in Google Scholar

20. DSTU. DSTU 7863-2015: Soil quality. Determination of alkaline-hydrolysed nitrogen by the Cornfield method. Kyiv, Ukraine; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

21. DSTU. DSTU 8347-2015: Soil quality. Determination of available sulphur in modification of NSC IGA name Sokolovsky. Kyiv, Ukraine; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

22. DSTU. DSTU 7632-2014 Soils. Method for determination of organic matter. Kyiv, Ukraine; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

23. EPA. SW-846 Test Method 6200–2007: Field portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for the determination of elemental concentrations in soil and sediment. Washington DC, USA; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

24. Tichonenko D, Degtyar’ov V, Krochin S. Practice in soil sciences. In: Tichonenko D, Degtyar’ov V, editors. Vinnytsia: Nova kniha, 2008:448 [in Ukrainian].Search in Google Scholar

25. Balyuk S, Lazebna M. Main standard documents in the field of soil science, agrochemistry and soil protection. Kharkiv: National Research Centre “Institute of soil science and agrochemistry named after O.H.Sokolovskyi”, 2015:76 [in Ukrainian].Search in Google Scholar

26. Rudnick RL, Gao S. Composition of the continental crust. In: Treatise on geochemistry. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2003:1–64.10.1016/B0-08-043751-6/03016-4Search in Google Scholar

27. Salminen R, editor. FOREGS geochemical atlas of Europe, part 1: background information, methodology and maps. Espoo, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

28. Pogrzeba M, Krzyżak J, Rusinowski S, Hebner A, Kopielski K, Werle S, et al. Possibility of using energy crops for phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated land – a three-year experience. In: Mudryk K, Werle S, editors. Renewable energy sources: engineering, technology, innovation. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Cham: Springer, 2018:33–45.10.1007/978-3-319-72371-6_4Search in Google Scholar

29. Jiang H, Zhao X, Fang J, Xiao Y. Physiological responses and metal uptake of Miscanthus under cadmium/arsenic stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2018;25(28):28275–84.10.1007/s11356-018-2835-zSearch in Google Scholar

30. Sasmaz M, Sasmaz A. The accumulation of strontium by native plants grown on Gumuskoy mining soils. J Geochemical Explor 2017;181:236–42.10.1016/j.gexplo.2017.08.001Search in Google Scholar

31. Sperotto RA, Ricachenevsky FK, Williams LE, Vasconcelos MW, Menguer PK, editors. From soil to seed: micronutrient movement into and within the plant. Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers SA Media, 2014. (Frontiers Research Topics).10.3389/978-2-88919-351-6Search in Google Scholar

32. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. Trace elements in soils and plants. 3rd Edition; Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001:403.10.1201/9781420039900Search in Google Scholar

33. Dolar SG, Keeney DR. Availability of Cu, Zn and Mn in soils: I.– Influence of soil pH, organic matter, and extractable phosphorus. J Sci Food Agric 1971;22(6):273–8.10.1002/jsfa.2740220602Search in Google Scholar

34. Smith SR. Effect of soil pH on availability to crops of metals in sewage sludge-treated soils. I. Nickel, copper and zinc uptake and toxicity to ryegrass. Environ Pollut 1994;85(3):321–7.10.1016/0269-7491(94)90054-XSearch in Google Scholar

35. Tlustoš P, Száková J, Kořínek K, Pavlíková D, Hanč A, Balík J. The effect of liming on cadmium, lead, and zinc uptake reduction by spring wheat grown in contaminated soil. Plant Soil Environ 2011;52(No. 1):16–24.10.17221/3341-PSESearch in Google Scholar

36. Bowen JE. Absorption of copper, zinc, and manganese by sugarcane leaf tissue. Plant Physiol 1969;44(2):255–61.10.1104/pp.44.2.255Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Steenbjerg F. Yield curves and chemical plant analyses. Plant Soil 1951;3(2):97–109.10.1007/BF01676368Search in Google Scholar

38. Dias AS, Lidon FC. II. Heat stress in Triticum: kinetics of Cu and Zn accumulation. Brazilian J Plant Physiol 2009;21(2):135–42.10.1590/S1677-04202009000200006Search in Google Scholar

39. Dias AS, Lidon FC, Ramalho JC. IV. Heat stress in Triticum: kinetics of Fe and Mn accumulation. Brazilian J Plant Physiol 2009;21(2):153–64.10.1590/S1677-04202009000200008Search in Google Scholar

40. Turan MA, Elkarim AHA, Taban N, Taban S. Effect of salt stress on growth and ion distribution and accumulation in shoot and root of maize plant. African J Agric Res 2010;5(7):584–8.Search in Google Scholar

41. Fleming AL. Enhanced Mn accumulation by snapbean cultivars under FE stress. J Plant Nutr 1989;12(6):715–31.10.1080/01904168909363986Search in Google Scholar

42. Becana M, Moran JF, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I. Iron-dependent oxygen free radical generation in plants subjected to environmental stress: toxicity and antioxidant protection. Plant Soil 1998;201(1):137–47.10.1023/A:1004375732137Search in Google Scholar

43. Prashanth SR, Sadhasivam V, Parida A. Over expression of cytosolic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from a mangrove plant Avicennia marina in indica rice var Pusa basmati – 1 confers abiotic stress tolerance. Transgenic Res 2008;17(2):281–91.10.1007/s11248-007-9099-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Bowler C, Montagu MV, Inze D. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1992;43(1):83–116.10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.000503Search in Google Scholar

45. Schmidt SB, Jensen PE, Husted S. Manganese deficiency in plants: the impact on photosystem II. Trends Plant Sci 2016;21(7):622–32.10.1016/j.tplants.2016.03.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Andrejić G, Gajić G, Prica M, Dželetović Ž, Rakić T. Zinc accumulation, photosynthetic gas exchange, and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Zn-stressed Miscanthus×giganteus plants. Photosynthetica 2018;56(4):1249–58.10.1007/s11099-018-0827-3Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2018-0088).


Received: 2018-12-09
Accepted: 2019-05-20
Published Online: 2019-07-18
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2018-0088/html
Scroll to top button