Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 11, 2022

An overview of mechanical and corrosion properties of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with plant based natural fibres

  • Isah Aliyu ORCID logo , Salit Mohd Sapuan EMAIL logo , Edi Syams Zainudin , Mohd Zuhri Mohamed Yusoff , Ridwan Yahaya and Che Nor Aiza Jaafar
From the journal Physical Sciences Reviews

Abstract

Many researchers have become more interested in utilizing plant based natural fibre as reinforcement for the fabrication of aluminium matrix composites (AMCs) in recent time. The utilization of these environmentally friendly and cost effective plant based natural fibre is necessitated to avoid environmental pollution. The desire for cost-effective and low-cost energy materials in automotive, biomedical, aerospace, marine, and other applications, however, is redefining the research environment in plant based natural fibre metal matrix composite materials. As a result, the goal of this review study is to investigate the impact of agricultural waste-based reinforcements on the mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of AMCs made using various fabrication routes. Processing settings can be modified to produce homogenous structures with superior AMC characteristics, according to the findings. Plant based natural fibre ash reinforcing materials such as palm kernel shell ash, rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse, bamboo stem ash, and corn cob ash can reduce AMCs density without sacrificing mechanical qualities. Furthermore, efficient utilization of plant based natural fibre reduces manufacturing costs and prevents environmental pollution, making it a sustainable material. Brittle composites , unlike ceramic and synthetic reinforced composites, are not formed by plant based natural fibre reinforcements. As a result of our findings, plant based natural fibre AMCs have a high potential to replace expensive and hazardous ceramic and synthetic reinforced-AMCs, which can be used in a variety of automotive applications requiring lower cost, higher strength-to-weight ratio, and corrosion resistance.


Corresponding author: Salit Mohd Sapuan, Advanced Engineering Materials and Composites Research Centre (AEMC), Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; and Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia, E-mail:

Funding source: The research was made possible through research funding grant from Universiti Putra Malaysia and assistance of Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria

Award Identifier / Grant number: GP/IPS/2021/9697100

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This research was made possible through the funding of Universiti Putra Malaysia (GP-IPS/2021/9697100) and the cooperation of Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Gayathri, J, Elansezhian, R. Materials today: proceedings enhancement of mechanical properties of aluminium metal matrix composite by reinforcing waste alumina catalyst and nano Al2O3. Mater Today Proc 2021;45:462–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gowrishankar, MC, Shivaprakash, YM, Kumar, D, Prafful, AJS, Prasad, Y. Production and mechanical testing of aluminium alloy based hybrid metal matrix composite. Mater Today Proc 2018;5:23872–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.179.Search in Google Scholar

3. Edoziuno, FO, Nwaeju, CC, Adediran, AA, Odoni, BU, Arun, VR. Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of aluminium 6063 alloy/palm kernel shell composites for lightweight applications. Sci African 2021;12:e00781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00781.Search in Google Scholar

4. Kumar, KR, Pridhar, T, Balaji, VSS. Mechanical properties and characterization of zirconium oxide (ZrO 2) and coconut shell ash (CSA) reinforced aluminium (Al 6082) matrix hybrid composite. J Alloys Compd 2018;765:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.177.Search in Google Scholar

5. Arunkumar, S, Sundaram, MS, Suketh, KM, Vigneshwara, S. Materials today: proceedings a review on aluminium matrix composite with various reinforcement particles and their behaviour. Mater Today Proc 2020;33:484–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.053.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kerni, L, Singh, S, Patnaik, A, Kumar, N. A review on natural fiber reinforced composites. Mater Today Proc 2020;28:1616–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.851.Search in Google Scholar

7. Yadav, R, Kumar, VD, Prakash, SD. Eggshell and rice husk ash utilization as reinforcement in development of composite material: a review. Mater Today Proc 2021;43:426–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.717.Search in Google Scholar

8. Dayma, S, Patel, C. Development of aluminium-based metal matrix composites (MMCs) using industrial and agro wastes as reinforcement-A review various engineering applications as reinforcement enhances mechanical properties like hardness , due to higher reinforcement cost. In: International research conference on innovations, startup and investments (ICOSTART-2019); 2019:55–61 pp.Search in Google Scholar

9. Babu, RBMR. Effect of mechanical properties on palm sprout shell ash reinforced with Al-6061 alloy metal matrix composites. Int J Sci Res Eng Trends 2019;5:2395–566.Search in Google Scholar

10. Pravinkumar, M. Characterization of aluminium hybrid composite reinforcement with teak wood ash and bamboo ash by using stir casting process. Int J Eng Res Technol 2018;7:423–30.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ochuokpa, EO, Yawas, DS, Okorie, PU, Sumaila, M. Evaluation of mechanical and metallurgical properties Al-Si-Mg/mangiferaindica seed shell ash (MSSA) particulate composite for production of motorcycle hub. J Sci Educ Technol 2021;9:221–38.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zubairu, PT, Hassan, AB, Muriana, RA, Musa, NA. Effect of shea nutshell as on the mechanical properties of cast Al6061. J Arid Environ 2021;10:95–102.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kanthasamy, S, Ravikumar, TS, Tamilanban, T. Influence of coconut shell ash particle (CSAp) as reinforcement on mechanical and wear behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Today Proc 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.832.Search in Google Scholar

14. Babu, PM, Rajamuneeswaran, S, Pritima, D, Marichamy, S, Vairamuthu, J. Spark erosion machining behaviour of coconut shell ash reinforced silicon metal matrix. Mater Today Proc 2020;33:4602–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.195.Search in Google Scholar

15. Olaniran, O, Uwaifo, O, Bamidele, E, Olaniran, B. An investigation of the mechanical properties of organic silica, bamboo leaf ash and rice husk reinforced aluminium hybrid composite. Int J Mater Sci 2019;3:129–34. https://doi.org/10.15406/mseij.2019.03.00103.Search in Google Scholar

16. Butola, R, Pratap, C, Shukla, A, Walia, RS. Effect on the mechanical properties of aluminum-based hybrid metal matrix composite using stir casting method. Mater Sci Forum 2019;969:253–9. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.969.253.Search in Google Scholar

17. Butola, R, Kanwar, S, Tyagi, L, Singari, RM, Tyagi, M. Optimizing the machining variables in CNC turning of aluminum based hybrid metal matrix composites. SN Appl Sci 2020;2:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3155-8.Search in Google Scholar

18. Joseph, OO, Babaremu, KO. Agricultural waste as a reinforcement particulate for aluminum metal matrix composite (AMMCs): a review. Fibers 2019;4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7040033.Search in Google Scholar

19. Krushna, MG, Shekhar, PS, Kumar, SA. Effect of hot forging on high temperature tribilogical properties of aluminium composite reinforced with agro and industrial waste. Int J Eng Adv Technol 2019;8:1607–12. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F8204.088619.Search in Google Scholar

20. Panda, SS, Senapati, AK, Rao, PS. Effect of particle size on properties of industrial and agro waste-reinforced aluminum-matrix composite. JOM 2021;73:2096–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04700-3.Search in Google Scholar

21. Dwivedi, SP, Maurya, M, Maurya, NK, Srivastava, AK, Sharma, S, Saxena, A. Utilization of groundnut shell as reinforcement in development of aluminum based composite to reduce environment pollution: a review. Evergr 2020;7:15–25. https://doi.org/10.5109/2740937.Search in Google Scholar

22. Kanthasamy, S, Ravikumar, TS, Tamilanban, T. Mechanical and corrosion behavior of groundnut shell ash particle (GSAp) reinforced AZ31 magnesium composite. Mater Today Proc 2020:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.834.Search in Google Scholar

23. Nassar, MMA, Arunachalam, R, Alzebdeh, KI. Machinability of natural fiber reinforced composites: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;88:2985–3004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9010-9.Search in Google Scholar

24. Udoye, NE, Inegbenebor, AO. The study on improvement of aluminium alloy for engineering application: a review. Int J Mech Eng Technol 2019;10:380–5.Search in Google Scholar

25. Aigbodion, VS. Bean pod ash nanoparticles a promising reinforcement for aluminium matrix biocomposites. J Mater Res Technol 2019;8:6011–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.075.Search in Google Scholar

26. Srivyas, PD, Charoo, MS. Aluminum metal matrix composites a review of reinforcement; mechanical and tribological behavior. Int J Eng Technol 2018;7:117–22.10.14419/ijet.v7i2.4.13020Search in Google Scholar

27. Subramaniam, B, Purusothaman, VR, Karuppusamy, SM, Ganesh, SH, Markandan, RK. Review on properties of aluminium metal matrix composites. J Mech Energy Eng 2020;4:57–66. https://doi.org/10.30464/jmee.2020.4.1.57.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sathish, T, Karthick, S. Wear behaviour analysis on aluminium alloy 7050 with reinforced SiC through taguchi approach. J Mater Res Technol 2020;9:3481–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.085.Search in Google Scholar

29. Moona, G, Walia, RS, Rastogi, V, Sharma, R. Aluminium metal matrix composites: a retrospective investigation. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 2018;56:164–75.Search in Google Scholar

30. Thompson, R. Aluminium matrix composites: a sustainable solution. Reinf Plast 2021;65:10–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repl.2020.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

31. Yadav, R, Gupta, RK, Goyal, A. Study of tribological behaviour of hybrid metal matrix composites prepared by stir casting method. Mater Today Proc 2020;28:2218–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.527.Search in Google Scholar

32. Fayomi, OSI, Joseph, OO, Akande, IG, Ohiri, CK, Enechi, KO, Udoye, NE. Effect of CCBP doping on the multifunctional Al-0.5 Mg-15CCBP superalloy using liquid metallurgy process for advanced application. J Alloys Compd 2019;783:246–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.312.Search in Google Scholar

33. Olusesi, OS, Udoye, NE. Development and characterization of AA6061 aluminium alloy/clay and rice husk ash composite. Manuf Lett 2021;29:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2021.05.006.Search in Google Scholar

34. Ezema, IC, Aigbodion, VS, Okonkwo, EG, Obayi, CS. Fatigue properties of value-added composite from Al-Si-Mg/palm kernel shell ash nanoparticles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;107:3247–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05268-z.Search in Google Scholar

35. Varalakshmi, K, Ch Kishore Kumar, K, Ravindra Babu, P, Ch Sastry, MR. Characterization of Al 6061-coconut Shell ash metal matrix composites using stir casting. Int J Eng Sci 2019;2:41–9.10.18485/aeletters.2019.4.2.3Search in Google Scholar

36. Nakamura, M. Organosilica nanoparticles and medical imaging. In: The Enzymes, 1st ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2018, vol. 44:137–73 pp.10.1016/bs.enz.2018.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Croissant, JG, Fatieiev, Y, Almalik, A, Khashab, NM. Mesoporous silica and organosilica nanoparticles: physical chemistry, biosafety, delivery strategies, and biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 2018;7:1–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700831.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Nagaraj, A. A study on mechanical and tribological properties of aluminium 1100 alloys 6% of RHAp, BAp, CSAp, ZnOp and egg shellp composites by ANN. Silicon 2020;10:3367–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00731-8.Search in Google Scholar

39. Fatchurrohman, N, Farhana, N, Marini, CD. Investigation on the effect of friction stir processing parameters on micro-structure and micro-hardness of rice husk ash reinforced Al6061 metal matrix composites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2018;319:012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/319/1/012032.Search in Google Scholar

40. Ghanaraja, S, Gireesha, BL, Ravikumar, KS, Likith, P. Effect of forging on mechanical properties of rice husk ash-silicon carbide reinforced Al1100 hybrid composites. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics. College Park, Maryland; 2018, 020050:020050 p.10.1063/1.5029626Search in Google Scholar

41. Odoni, BU, Odikpo, F, Chinasa, NC, Akaluzia, RO. Experimental analysis, predictive modelling and optimization of some physical and mechanical properties of aluminium 6063 alloy based composites reinforced with corn cob ash. Eng Struct 2020;7:451–65.Search in Google Scholar

42. Sankara, RSR, Panigrahi, MK, Ganguly, RI, Srinivasa, GR. Optimization of tribological behaviour on Al-coconut shell ash composite at elevated temperature optimization of tribological behaviour on Al-coconut shell ash composite at elevated temperature. IOP Conference Series 2018;18:5332–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/314/1/012009.Search in Google Scholar

43. Raju, SS, Rao, SG, Samantra, C. Wear behavioral assessment of Al-CSAp-MMCs using grey-fuzzy approach. J Int Meas Confed 2019;140:254–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

44. Kumar, BP, Birru, AK. Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium metal matrix composites with addition of bamboo leaf ash by stir casting method. T Nonferr Metal Soc 2017;27:2555–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60284-X.Search in Google Scholar

45. Victor, GA. Abrasive wear behaviour of Al–Cu–Mg/palm kernel shell ash particulate composite. Leonardo El J Pract Technol 2017;31:77–92.Search in Google Scholar

46. Oyedeji, OE, Dauada, M, Yaro, SA, Abdulwahab, M. Characterization of Al–Mg–Si alloy reinforced with optimum palm kernel shell ash (PKSA) particle and its consequence on the dynamic properties for aerospace application. Res Sq 2021:1–14.10.21203/rs.3.rs-795334/v1Search in Google Scholar

47. Palanivendhan, M, Chandradass, J. Experimental investigation on mechanical and wear behavior of agro waste ash based metal matrix composite. Mater Today Proc 2021;45:6580–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.712.Search in Google Scholar

48. Usman, Y, Dauda, ET, Abdulwahab, M, Dodo, RM. Effect of mechanical properties and wear nehaviour onlocust bean waste ash (LBWA) particle reinforced aluminium alloy (A356 alloy) composites. Fudma J Sci 2002;4:416–21.Search in Google Scholar

49. Virkunwar, AK, Ghosh, S, Basak, R. Study of mechanical and tribological characteristics of aluminium alloy reinforced with sugarcane bagasse ash. In: An International Conference on Tribology. Mumbai; 2018;1–5 pp.10.2139/ssrn.3313510Search in Google Scholar

50. Jain, S, Aggarwal, V, Tyagi, M, Walia, RS, Rana, R. Development of aluminium matrix composite using coconut husk ash reinforcement. In: International conference on latest developments in materials, manufacturing and quality control (MMQC-2016); 2016:252–9 pp.Search in Google Scholar

51. Shankar, S, Balaji, A, Kawin, N. Investigations on mechanical and tribological properties of Al-si10-mg alloy/sugarcane bagasse ash particulate composites investigations on mechanical and tribological properties of Al-Si10-Mg alloy/sugarcane bagasse ash particulate composites. Part Sci Technol An Int J 2017;6351:0–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2017.1301609.Search in Google Scholar

52. Subrahmanyam, APSVR, Narsaraju, G, Rao, BS. Effect of rice husk ash and fly ash reinforcements on microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy (AlSi10Mg) matrix composites effect of rice husk ash and fly ash reinforcements on microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium al. Int J Adv Sci Technol 2015;76:1–8. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2015.76.01.Search in Google Scholar

53. Subrahmanyam, APSVR, Madhukiran, J, Naresh, G, Madhusudhan, S. Fabrication and characterization of Al356.2, rice husk ash and fly ash reinforced hybrid metal matrix composite. Int J Adv Sci Technol 2016;94:49–56. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2016.94.05.Search in Google Scholar

54. Manoj Kumar, D, Guru Dattatreya, GS, Krishnarjun Rao, N. Synthesis characterization and mechanical behavior of rice husk ash reinforced al-20mg 10 cu alloy matrix hybrid composites. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev 2018;8:111–8. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdfeb201813.Search in Google Scholar

55. Singh, B. 13. Rice husk ash. Waste and supplementary cementitious material in concrete. Bristol, England: Woodhead publishing; 2018:417–60 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00013-4Search in Google Scholar

56. Zou, Y, Yang, T. Rice husk, rice husk ash and their applications. Rice bran and rice bran oil. College Park, Maryland: AOCS Press; 2019:207–46 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-812828-2.00009-3Search in Google Scholar

57. Irawan, A, Latifat Upe, S, Meity Dwi, IPI. Effect of torrefaction process on the coconut shell energy content for solid fuel effect of torrefaction process on the coconut shell energy content for solid fuel. AIP Conf Proc 2020;020010:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979226.Search in Google Scholar

58. Lubwama, M, Yiga, VA. Characteristics of briquettes developed from rice and coffee husks for domestic cooking applications in Uganda. Renew Energy 2018;118:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.003.Search in Google Scholar

59. Oladele, SO, Adeyemo, AJ, Awodun, MA. Geoderma influence of rice husk biochar and inorganic fertilizer on soil nutrients availability and rain-fed rice yield in two contrasting soils. Geoderma 2019;336:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.025.Search in Google Scholar

60. Ríos-badran, M, Luzardo-Ocampo, I, Garcia-Trejo, JF, Santos-Crus, J, Gutierrez-Antonio, C. Production and characterization of fuel pellets from rice husk and wheat straw. Renew Energy 2020;145:500–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.048.Search in Google Scholar

61. Krishnadevi, K, Devaraju, S, Sriharshitha, S, Alagar, M, Priya, YK. Environmentally sustainable rice husk ash reinforced cardanol based polybenzoxazine bio – composites for insulation applications. Polym Bull 2020;77:2501–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02854-4.Search in Google Scholar

62. Tiwari, S, Pradhan, MK. Science direct effect of rice husk ash on properties of aluminium alloys: a review. Mater Today Proc 2017;4:486–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.049.Search in Google Scholar

63. Saini, S, Gupta, A, Mehta, AJ, Pramanik, S. Rice husk-extracted silica reinforced graphite/aluminium matrix hybrid composite. J Therm Anal Calorim 2020:147:0123456789.10.1007/s10973-020-10404-8Search in Google Scholar

64. Garud, V, Bhoite, S, Patil, S, Ghadage, S, Gaikwad, N. Performance and combustion characteristics of thermal barrier coated (YSZ) low heat rejection diesel engine. Mater Today Proc 2017;4:188–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.012.Search in Google Scholar

65. Kandpal, BC, Johri, N, Kumar, N, Srivastava, A. Effect of industrial/agricultural waste materials as reinforcement on properties of metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 2021;46:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.575.Search in Google Scholar

66. Marini, CD, Fatchurrohman, N, Zulkfli, Z. Proceedings morphological study of friction stir processed aluminium metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 2021;46:1745–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.569.Search in Google Scholar

67. Saini, S, Singh, S, Singh, K, Singh, A. Some studies into weldability of rice husk ash aluminium matrix composites using TIG welding. Mater Today Proc 2020;24:298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.279.Search in Google Scholar

68. Venkatesh, L, Arjunan, TV, Ravikumar, K. Microstructural characteristics and mechanical behaviour of aluminium hybrid composites reinforced with groundnut shell ash and B4C. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2019;41:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1800-1.Search in Google Scholar

69. Bhasha, CA, Balamurugan, K. Fabrication and property evaluation of Al 6061 + x% (RHA + TiC) hybrid metal matrix composite. SN Appl Sci 2019;1:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1016-0.Search in Google Scholar

70. Kumar, KR, Pridhar, T, Vettivel, SC. Influence on mechanical behaviour and characterization of a6063/bagasse and titanium nitride hybrid composites. Rev Cuba Fis 2021;74:473–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02143-z.Search in Google Scholar

71. Kasagani, S, Bellamkonda, PN, Sudabathula, S. Wear and friction behaviour of coconut shell ash reinforced aa-7075 metal. Int J Res 2020;VIII:477–85.Search in Google Scholar

72. Ikubanni, PP, Oki, M, Adeleke, AA, Adediran, AA, Adesina, OS. Influence of temperature on the chemical compositions and microstructural changes of ash formed from palm kernel shell. Results Eng 2020;8:100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100173.Search in Google Scholar

73. Prakash, R, Thenmozhi, R, Raman, SN, Subramanian, C, Divyah, N. Mechanical characterisation of sustainable fibre - reinforced lightweight concrete incorporating waste coconut shell as coarse aggregate and sisal fibre. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2021;18:1579–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02900-z.Search in Google Scholar

74. Tanko, J, Ahmadu, U, Sadiq, U, Muazu, A. Characterization of rice husk and coconut shell briquette as an alternative solid fuel. Adv Energy Convers 2020;2:1–12.10.37256/aecm.212021608Search in Google Scholar

75. Panda, B, Niranjan, CA, Vishwanatha, AD, Harisha, P, Chandan, KR, Kumar, R. Development of novel stir cast aluminium composite with modified coconut shell ash filler. Mater Today Proc 2019;22:2715–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.402.Search in Google Scholar

76. Mangalore, P, Ulvekar, A, Abhiram, A, Sanjay, J, Advaith. Mechanical properties of coconut shell ash reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites mechanical properties of coconut shell ash reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites. AIP Conf Proc 2019;020014:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5092897.Search in Google Scholar

77. Duc, PA, Dharanipriya, P, Velmurugan, BK, Shanmugavadivu, M. Groundnut shell- a beneficial bio-waste. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2019;20:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101206.Search in Google Scholar

78. Amu, O, Adetayo, O, Faluyi, F, Akinyele, E. Experimental study of improving the properties of lime-stabilized structural lateritic soil for highway structural works using groundnut shell ash. Walailak J 2021;18:2–17.10.48048/wjst.2021.9475Search in Google Scholar

79. Nalluri, N, Karri, VR. Use of groundnut shell compost as a natural fertilizer for the cultivation of vegetable plants. Int J Adv Res Sci Eng 2018;07:97–104.Search in Google Scholar

80. Dzomeku, IK, Illiasu, O. Effects of groundnut shell, rice husk and rice straw on the productivity of maize (Zea mays L) and soil fertility in the Guinea savannah zone of Ghana. ACTA Sci Agric 2018;2:29–35.Search in Google Scholar

81. Alaneme, KK, Bodunrin, MO, Awe, AA. Microstructure, mechanical and fracture properties of groundnut shell ash and silicon carbide dispersion strengthened aluminium matrix composites. J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci 2018;30:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2016.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

82. Jadhav, S, Aradhye, A, Kulkarni, S, Shinde, Y, Vaishampayan, V. Effect of hybrid ash reinforcement on microstructure of A356 alloy matrix composite. AIP Conf Proc 2019;2105:020010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5100695.Search in Google Scholar

83. Fanijo, E, Babafemi, AJ, Arowojolu, O. Performance of laterized concrete made with palm kernel shell as replacement for coarse aggregate. Constr Build Mater 2020;250:118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118829.Search in Google Scholar

84. Imoisili, PE, Ukoba, KO, Jen, TC. Synthesis and characterization of amorphous mesoporous silica from palm kernel shell ash. Bol Soc Esp Ceram Vidr 2020;59:159–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2019.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

85. Patrick, DO, Shahbaz, M. Thermogravimetric kinetics of catalytic and non-catalytic pyrolytic conversion of palm kernel shell with acid-treated coal bottom ash. Bionergy Res 2020;13:452–62.10.1007/s12155-020-10101-2Search in Google Scholar

86. Iyasele, EO. Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of a metal-matrix composite (MMC) reinforced with palm kernel/periwinkle shell ash. Glob Sci J 2018;6:1–24.Search in Google Scholar

87. Baffour-Awuah, E, Akinlabi, SA, Jen, TC, Hassan, S, Okokpujie, IP, Ishola, F. Characteristics of palm kernel shell and palm kernel shell-polymer composites: a review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021;1107:012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1107/1/012090.Search in Google Scholar

88. Omondiale, EI. Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of a metal-matrix composite (mmc) reinforced with palm kernel/periwinkle shell ash. Glob Sci J 2018;6:1–24.Search in Google Scholar

89. Paya, J, Monzo, J, Borrachero, MV, Tashima, MM, Soriano, L. Bagasse ash. In: Waste and supplementary cementitious material in concrete. Amstersam, the Netherlands: Woodhead publising; 2018;559–98 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00017-1Search in Google Scholar

90. Torgbo, S, Quan, MV, Sukyai, P. Cellulosic value-added products from sugarcane bagasse. Cellulose 2021;28:5219–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03918-3.Search in Google Scholar

91. Narisetty, V, Castro, E, Durgapal, S, Coulon, F, Jacob, S, Kumar, D, et al.. High level xylitol production by pichia fermentans using non-detoxified xylose-rich sugarcane bagasse and olive pits hydrolysates. Bioresour Technol 2021;342:126005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

92. Hernández-Olivares, F, Medina-alvarado, RE, Burneo-valdivieso, XE, Zúñiga-suárez, AR. Short sugarcane bagasse fibers cementitious composites for building construction. Constr Build Mater 2020;247:8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118451.Search in Google Scholar

93. Murugesan, T, Vidjeapriya, R, Bahurudeen, A. Development of sustainable alkali activated binder for construction using sugarcane bagasse ash and marble waste. Sugar Tech 2020;22:885–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00825-y.Search in Google Scholar

94. Dada, A, Ajibola, W. Experimental analysis of metal matrix composite. Int J Mod Trends Eng Res 2019;6:13–28. https://doi.org/10.21884/IJMTER.2019.6005.RELAT.Search in Google Scholar

95. Hernandez-Ruiz, JE, Pino-Rivero, L, Villar-Cocina, E. Aluminium matrix composite with sugarcane bagasse ash as reinforcement material. Construct Build Mater 2019;36:55–9.Search in Google Scholar

96. Palanivendhan, M, Chandaradass, J, Philip, J. Fabrication and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy/bagasse ash composite by stir casting method. Mater Today Proc 2021;45:6547–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.458.Search in Google Scholar

97. Akinlabi, ET, Anane, FK, Akwada, DR. Properties of bamboo. Amstersam, the Netherlands: Springer International Publishing; 2017:87–147 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-56808-9_3Search in Google Scholar

98. Khairul, M, Mohd, H, Sapawe, N. Effective performance of silica nanoparticles extracted from bamboo leaves ash for removal of phenol. Mater Today Proc 2020;31:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.964.Search in Google Scholar

99. Silva, LHP, Tamashiro, JR, Guedes de Paiva, FF, Fernando do Santo, L, Teixeira, SR, Kinoshita, A, et al.. Bamboo leaf ash for use as mineral addition with Portland cement. J Build Eng 2021;42:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102769.Search in Google Scholar

100. Patel, NS, Patel, AD. Studies on properties of Al-sic MMCs for making valves for automobile components – a technical review. Trans Indian Inst Met 2017;2:305–8.Search in Google Scholar

101. Parveez, B, Maleque, MA, Jamal, NA. Influence of agro-based reinforcements on the properties of aluminum matrix composites: a systematic review. J Mater Sci 2021;56:16195–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06305-2.Search in Google Scholar

102. Akinwamide, SO, Abe, BT, Akinribide, OJ, Obadele, BA, Olubambi, PA. Characterization of microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion response of aluminium-based composites fabricated via casting—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;109:975–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05703-1.Search in Google Scholar

103. Bodunrin, MO, Alaneme, KK, Chown, LH. Aluminium matrix hybrid composites: a review of reinforcement philosophies; Mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. J Mater Res Technol 2015;4:434–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

104. Hynes, JNR, Sankaranarayanan, R, Tharmaraj, R, Pruncu, CI, Dispinar, D. A comparative study of the mechanical and tribological behaviours of different aluminium matrix – ceramic composites. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2019;41:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1831-7.Search in Google Scholar

105. Manikandan, R, Arjunan, TV, Akhil, R, Nath, OP. Studies on micro structural characteristics, mechanical and tribological behaviour of boron carbide and cow dung ash reinforced aluminium (Al 7075) hybrid metal matrix composite. Compos Part B 2020;183:107668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107668.Search in Google Scholar

106. Kereem, A, Qudeiri, JA, Abdudeen, A, Ahammed, T, Ziout, A. A review on AA 6061 metal matrix composites produced by stir casting. Materials 2021;14:1–22.10.3390/ma14010175Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

107. Jayabalaji, G, Manimaran, P, Arun Shankar, VV. Investigation on influence of process parameters in WEDM of hybrid aluminiun composite processed through squeeze casting. J Crit Rev 2020;7:197–9. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.41.Search in Google Scholar

108. AbuShanab, WS, Moustafa, EB, Ghandourah, E, Taha, MA. A comprehensive study of Al–Cu–Mg system reinforced with nano-ZrO 2 particles synthesized by powder metallurgy technique Waheed S. AbuShanab; 2021:1–34 pp.10.21203/rs.3.rs-326782/v1Search in Google Scholar

109. Bhoi, NK, Singh, H, Pratap, S. Developments in the aluminum metal matrix composites reinforced by micro/nano particles – a review. J Compos Mater 2019;64:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998319865307.Search in Google Scholar

110. Muni, RN, Singh, J, Kumar, V, Sharma, S. Influence of rice husk ash, cu, mg on the mechanical behaviour of aluminium matrix hybrid composites. Int J Appl Eng Res 2019;14:1828–34.Search in Google Scholar

111. Vanam, JP, Rao, KN. Characterization and tribological behaviour of aluminium metal matrix composite. J Eng Res Appl 2018;8:6–11. https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0809040611.Search in Google Scholar

112. Ramamoorthi, R, Hillary, JJM, Sundaramoorthy, R, Jim Joseph, JD, Kalidas, K, Manickaraj, K. Influence of stir casting route process parameters in fabrication of aluminium matrix composites – a review. Mater Today Proc 2021;45:6660–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.068.Search in Google Scholar

113. Panwar, N, Chauhan, A. Fabrication methods of particulate reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite–a review. Mater Today Proc 2018;5:5933–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.194.Search in Google Scholar

114. Sundriyal, P, Sah, PL. Enhancement of mechanical properties of graphite particulate aluminum metal matrix composites by magnesium addition. Mater Today Proc 2017;4:9481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.208.Search in Google Scholar

115. Yashpal, S, Jawalkar, CS, Verma, AS, Suri, NM. Fabrication of aluminium metal matrix composites with particulate reinforcement: a review. Mater Today Proc 2017;4:2927–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.174.Search in Google Scholar

116. Kumar, NS. Fabrication and characterization of Al7075/RHA/Mica composite by squeeze casting. Mater Today Proc 2020;37:750–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.769.Search in Google Scholar

117. Bannaravuri, PK, Birru, AK. Strengthening of Al-4.5% Cu alloy with the addition of silicon carbide and bamboo leaf ash. Int J Struct Integr 2019;10:149–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-03-2018-0018.Search in Google Scholar

118. Kaladgi, ARR, Fazlur Rehman, K, Afzal, A, Baig, MA, Soudagar, MEM, Bhattacharyya, S. Fabrication characteristics and mechanical behaviour of aluminium alloy reinforced with Al 2 O 3 and coconut shell particles synthesized by stir casting. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021;1057:012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1057/1/012017.Search in Google Scholar

119. Ebenezer, NS, Vinod, B, Jagadesh, HS. Corrosion behaviour of bamboo leaf ash-reinforced nickel surface-deposited aluminium metal matrix composites. J Bio Tribo Corros 2021;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-021-00510-x.Search in Google Scholar

120. Okoye, CNC, Ochieze, BQ. Age hardening process modeling and optimization of aluminum alloy A356/Cow horn particulate composite for brake drum application using RSM, ANN and simulated annealing. Def Technol 2018;14:336–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

121. Shaikh, MBN, Arif, S, Aziz, T, Waseem, A, Shaikh, MAN, Ali, M. Microstructural, mechanical and tribological behaviour of powder metallurgy processed SiC and RHA reinforced Al-based composites. Surface Interfac 2019;15:166–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

122. Sathish Kumar, N, Harshavardhan, KP, Arul Murugan, R. Characterization of aluminium hybrid composite reinforced with baggase ash and graphite processed through squeeze casting. J Crit Rev 2020;7:176–8. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.35.Search in Google Scholar

123. Chandla, NK, Yashpal, Kant, S, Goud, MM, Jawalkar, CS. Experimental analysis and mechanical characterization of Al 6061/alumina/bagasse ash hybrid reinforced metal matrix composite using vacuum-assisted stir casting method. J Compos Mater 2020;54:4283–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320929417.Search in Google Scholar

124. Kesarwani, S, Niranjan, MS, Singh, V. To study the effect of different reinforcements on various parameters in aluminium matrix composite during CNC turning. Compos Commun 2020;22:100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100504.Search in Google Scholar

125. Bodunrin, M, Oladijo, P, Daramola, OO, Alaneme, KK. Porosity measurement and wear performance of aluminium hybrid composites reinforced. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara-Int J Eng 2016;14:231–8.Search in Google Scholar

126. Senapati, AK, Manas, VS, Singh, A, Dash, S. A comparative investigation on physical and mechanical properties of MMC reinforced with waste materials. Int J Res Eng Technol 2016;05:172–8.10.15623/ijret.2016.0503036Search in Google Scholar

127. Cheng, L, Yu, D, Hu, E, Tang, Y, Hu, K, Dearn, KD, et al.. Surface modified rice husk ceramic particles as a functional additive: improving the tribological behaviour of aluminium matrix composites. Carbon Lett 2018;26:51–60. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.26.051.Search in Google Scholar

128. Ramanathan, S, Vinod, B, Narayanasamy, M, Anandajothi, P. Dry sliding wear mechanism maps of Al – 7Si – 0. 3Mg hybrid composite: novel approach of agro-industrial waste particles to reduce cost of material. J Bio Tribo Corros 2019;5:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-019-0227-7.Search in Google Scholar

129. Bello, AS, Raheem, AI, Raji, KN. Study of tensile properties, fractography and morphology of aluminium (1xxx)/coconut shell micro particle composites. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci 2017;29:269–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2015.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

130. Dinaharan, I, Kalaiselvan, K, Murugan, N. Influence of rice husk ash particles on microstructure and tensile behavior of AA6061 aluminum matrix composites produced using friction stir processing. Compos Commun 2017;3:42–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2017.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

131. Alaneme, KK, Sanusi, KO. Microstructural characteristics, mechanical and wear behaviour of aluminium matrix hybrid composites reinforced with alumina, rice husk ash and graphite. Eng Sci Technol An Int J 2015;18:416–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

132. Anas, M, Khan, MZ. Comparison of hardness and strength of fly ash and bagasse ash Al-MMCs. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol 2015;1:88–93.Search in Google Scholar

133. Durowoju, MO, Agunsoye, JO, Mudashiru, LO, Yekinni, AA, Bello, SK, Rabiu, TO. Optimization of stir casting process parameters to improve the hardness property of Al/RHA matrix composites. Eur J Eng Res Sci 2017;2:5. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2017.2.11.498.Search in Google Scholar

134. Moosa, A, Awad, AY. Influence of rice husk ash-yttrium oxide addition on the mechanical properties behavior of aluminum alloy matrix hybrid composites. Int J Curr Eng Technol 2016;6:804–12.Search in Google Scholar

135. Rana, H, Badheka, V. Influence of friction stir processing conditions on the manufacturing of Al–Mg–Zn–Cu alloy/boron carbide surface composite. J Mater Process Tech. 2018;255:795–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.020.Search in Google Scholar

136. Weglowski, MS. Friction stir processing – state of the art. Arcives Civ Mech Eng 2017;8:114–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

137. Banoth, R, Prasad, KR. A comparative based review on aluminium based metal matrix composites by friction stir processing. Int J Recent Technol Eng 2018;8:476–86.Search in Google Scholar

138. Boopathi, S, Thillaivanan, A, Pandian, M, Subbiah, R, Shanmugam, P. Friction stir processing of boron carbide reinforced aluminium surface (Al-B4C) composite: mechanical characteristics analysis. Mater Today Proc 2021;50:2430–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.261.Search in Google Scholar

139. Shaik, D, Sudhakar, I, Bharat, GCSG, Varshini, V, Vikas, S. Tribological behavior of friction stir processed AA6061 aluminium alloy. Mater Today Proc 2021;44:860–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.788.Search in Google Scholar

140. Oghenevweta, JE, Aigbodion, VS, Nyior, GB, Asuke, F. Mechanical properties and microstructural analysis of Al–Si–Mg/carbonized maize stalk waste particulate composites. J Eng Sci King Saud Univ 2016;28:222–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.03.009.Search in Google Scholar

141. Gupta, MK. Effects of tool pin profile and feed rate on wear performance of pine leaf ash/Al composite prepared by friction stir processing. J Adhes Sci Technol 2021;35:256–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1800290.Search in Google Scholar

142. Van Trinh, P, Lee, J, Ngoc, PM, Dinh, DP, Hyung, SH. Effect of oxidation of SiC particles on mechanical properties and wear behavior of SiC p/Al6061 composites. J Alloys Compd 2018;769:282–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.355.Search in Google Scholar

143. Guo, B, Zhang, X, Cen, X, Chen, B, Wang, X, Song, M, et al.. Enhanced mechanical properties of aluminum based composites reinforced by chemically oxidized carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 2018;139:459–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.026.Search in Google Scholar

144. Chen, G, Yang, W, Xin, L, Wang, P, Lui, S, Qiao, J, et al.. Mechanical properties of Al matrix composite reinforced with diamond particles with W coatings prepared by the magnetron sputtering method. J Alloys Compd 2018;735:777–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.183.Search in Google Scholar

145. Azadi, M, Zolfaghari, M, Rezanezhad, S, Azadi, M. Preparation of various aluminium matrix composites reinforcing by nano-particles with different dispersion methods preparation of various aluminium matrix composites reinforcing by nano-particles with different dispersion methods. In: Proc Iran Int Alu Conf. Bangalore. India; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

146. Mussatto, A, Ahad, IUI, Mousavian, RT, Delaure, Y, Brabazon, D. Advanced production routes for metal matrix composites. Eng Reports 2020;5:1634–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12330.Search in Google Scholar

147. Jose, J, Peter, EP, Feby, JA, George, AJ, Joseph, J, Chandra, GR, et al.. Manufacture and characterization of a novel agro-waste based low cost metal matrix composite (MMC) by compocasting. Mater Res Express 2018;5:066530. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aac803.Search in Google Scholar

148. Sohail, MA, Motgi, BS, Purohit, KG. Fabrication of Al 7068 reinforced with tur husk ash (THA) and alumina hybrid metal matrix composite by powder metallurgy and evaluating its microstructure and mechanical properties. Int J Sci Res Eng Trends 2019;5:1634–43.Search in Google Scholar

149. Panwar, N, Chauhan, A. Fabrication methods of particulate reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite-a review. Mater Today 2018;5:5933–9.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.194Search in Google Scholar

150. Ramanathan, A, Krishnan, PK, Muraliraja, R. A review on the production of metal matrix composites through stir casting – furnace design, properties, challenges, and research opportunities. J Manuf Process 2019;42:213–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.017.Search in Google Scholar

151. Satheesh, M, Pugazhvadivu, M. Investigation on physical and mechanical properties of Al6061-silicon carbide (SiC)/coconut shell ash (CSA) hybrid composites. Phys B Condens Matter 2019;572:70–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.07.058.Search in Google Scholar

152. Udoye, NE, Nnamba, OJ, Fayomi, OSI, Inegbenebor, AO, Jolayemi, KJ. Analysis on mechanical properties of AA6061/Rice husk ash composites produced through stir casting technique. Mater Today Proc 2020;43:1415–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.178.Search in Google Scholar

153. Kumar, A, Kumar, M. Mechanical and dry sliding wear behaviour of B4C and rice husk ash reinfroced Al 7075 alloy hybrid composite for armors application by using taguchi techniques. Mater Today Proc 2019;27:2617–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.075.Search in Google Scholar

154. Babaremu, KO, Joseph, OO, Akinlabi, ET, Jen, TC, Oladijo, OP. Morphological investigation and mechanical behaviour of agrowaste reinforced aluminium alloy 8011 for service life improvement. Heliyon 2020;6:e05506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05506.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

155. Apasi, A, Yawas, DS, Abdulkareem, S, Kolawole, MY. Improving mechanical properties of aluminium alloy through addition of coconut shell-ash. J Sci Technol 2016;36:34–43.10.4314/just.v36i3.4Search in Google Scholar

156. Yashpal, CS, Jawalkar, S, Kant, N, Panwar, M, Sharma, D, Pali, HS. Effect of particle size variation of bagasse ash on mechanical properties of aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 2020;21:2024–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.319.Search in Google Scholar

157. Devanathan, R, Ravikumar, J, Boopathi, S, Christopher Selvam, D, Anicia, SA. Influence in mechanical properties of stir cast aluminium (AA6061) hybrid metal matrix composite (HMMC) with silicon carbide, fly ash and coconut coir ash reinforcement. Mater Today Proc 2019;22:3136–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.450.Search in Google Scholar

158. Sarkar, S, Bhirangi, A, Mathew, J, Oyyaravelu, R, Kuppan, P, Balan, ASS. Fabrication characteristics and mechanical behavior of rice husk ash-silicon carbide reinforced Al-6061 alloy matrix hybrid composite. Mater Today Proc 2018;5:12706–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.254.Search in Google Scholar

159. Muralimohan, R, Kempaiah, UN, Seenappa. Influence of rice husk ash and B4C on mechanical properties of ADC 12 alloy hybrid composites. Mater Today Proc 2018;5:25562–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.363.Search in Google Scholar

160. Thimothy, P, Sankara, S, Ratnam, C. Development and accretion of tribological performance on Al-CSA composites using orthogonal array. Mater Today Proc 2019;18:5332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.558.Search in Google Scholar

161. Omoniyi, P, Adekunle, A, Ibitoye, S, Olorunpomi, O, Abolusoro, O. Mechanical and microstructural evaluation of aluminium matrix composite reinforced with wood particles. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci 2021;34:445–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.01.006.Search in Google Scholar

162. Verma, N, Vettivel, SC. Characterization and experimental analysis of boron carbide and rice husk ash reinforced AA7075 aluminium alloy hybrid composite. J Alloys Compd 2018;741:981–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.185.Search in Google Scholar

163. Udoye, NE, Inegbenebor, AO, Fayomi, OSI. Corrosion performance and wear behaviour of AA6061 reinforced hybrid: nano – rice husk ash/clay particulate for cooling tower fan blade in 0 1 75 M H. J Bio Tribo Corros 2020;6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-020-00359-6.Search in Google Scholar

164. Arora, G, Sharma, S. Effects of rice husk ash and silicon carbide addition on AA6351 hybrid green composites. Emerg Mater Res 2020;9:141–6. https://doi.org/10.1680/jemmr.18.00007.Search in Google Scholar

165. Alaneme, KK, Ekperusi, JO, Oke, SR. Corrosion behaviour of thermal cycled aluminium hybrid composites reinforced with rice husk ash and silicon carbide. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci 2018;30:391–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2016.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

166. Ikumapayi, OM, Akinlabi, ET, Majumdar, JD, Fayomi, OSI, Akinlabi, A. Corrosion study and quantitative measurement of crystallite size of high strength aluminum hybrid composite developed via friction stir processing korrosionsuntersuchung und quantitative messung der. Materwiss Werksttech 2020;51:732–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.202000003.Search in Google Scholar

167. Suriani, MJ, Zulkifli, F, Khairul, MA, Azaman, MD, Jorkoni, MNK. Corrosion behavior of hybrid coconut shell powder and silica carbide reinforced aluminium composite towards aggressive biofilm attack corrosion behavior of hybrid coconut shell powder and silica carbide reinforced aluminium composite towards aggressive bi. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2019;670:012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/670/1/012006.Search in Google Scholar

168. Udoye, NE, Nnamba, OJFOSI, Inegbennebor, AO. Corrosion performance of AA6061/rice husk ash composite for engineering application. In: Int conf eng sustain world (ICESW 2020); 2021.10.1088/1757-899X/1107/1/012121Search in Google Scholar

169. Rao, GB, Bannaravuri, PK, Birru, AK. Effect on corrosion behaviour of the surface of aluminium 4. 5 Cu with bamboo leaf ash composites by laser treatment. Mater Res Express 2020;7:016594.10.1088/2053-1591/ab6c9fSearch in Google Scholar

170. Alaneme, KK, Eze, HI, Bodunrin, MO. Corrosion behaviour of groundnut shell ash and silicon carbide hybrid reinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix composites in 3.5% NaCl and 0.3M H 2SO4 solutions. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 2015;14:141–58.Search in Google Scholar

171. Nithyanandhan, T, Sivaraman, P, Ramamoorthi, R, Kumar, PS, Kannakumar, R. Enhancement of corrosion behaviour of AL6061-B 4 C-RHA reinforced hybrid composite. Mater Today Proc 2020:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.167.Search in Google Scholar

172. Daramola, OO, Adediran, AA. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of coconut shell ash reinforced aluminium (6063) alloy composites. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 2015;27:107–19.Search in Google Scholar

173. Ikumapayi, OM, Akinlabi, E. A comparative assessment of tensile strength and corrosion potection in friction stir processed AA7075-T651 matrix composites using fly ashes nanoparticles as reinforcement inhibi … protection in friction stir processed AA7075-T651 matrix. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev 2019;9:839–54. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdjun201992.Search in Google Scholar

174. Ikumapayi, OM, Akinlabi, ET, Abegunde, OO, Fayomi, OSI. Electrochemical investigation of calcined agrowastes powders on friction stir processing of aluminium-based matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 2019;26:3238–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.906.Search in Google Scholar

175. Idusuyi, N, Oviroh, PO, Adekoya, AH. A study on the corrosion and mechanical properties of an Al6063 reinforced with egg shell ash and rice husk ash. In: International mechanical engineering congress and exposition (IMECE2018), American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York, NY: International Mechanical Envgineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE); 2018, 52170:V012T11A016 p.10.1115/IMECE2018-86662Search in Google Scholar

176. Aigbodion, VS, Ozor, PO, Eke, MN, Nwoji, CU. Explicit microstructure, corrosion, and stress analysis of value-added Al-3.7% Cu-1.4%Mg/1.5% rice husk ash nanoparticles for pump impeller application. Chem Data Collect 2021;33:100675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2021.100675.Search in Google Scholar

177. Edoziuno, FO, Adediran, AA, Odoni, BU, Utu, OG, Olayanju, A. Physico-chemical and morphological evaluation of palm kernel shell particulate reinforced aluminium matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 2019;38:652–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.641.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-08
Accepted: 2022-06-01
Published Online: 2022-10-11

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0044/html
Scroll to top button