Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 22, 2013

The effect of organoclay contents on morphological characterization, mechanical and thermal properties of epoxidized natural rubber-50 toughened polyamide 6 nanocomposites

  • Hamed Nouparvar , Azman Hassan EMAIL logo , Zurina Mohamad , Mat Uzir Wahit and Fatemeh Roozbahani

Abstract

Nanocomposites consisting of polyamide 6 (PA6) matrix with epoxidized natural rubber-50 (ENR-50) and organoclay-modified montmorillonite (OMMT) were prepared by melt blending in a twin-screw extruder followed by injection molding. The influence of varying amounts (0–6 phr) of OMMT loadings on ENR-50 (10 wt.%) toughened PA6 nanocomposites was examined. Morphological characterizations and mechanical and thermal properties of the blend and nanocomposites were investigated. The addition of OMMT resulted in an increase in tensile strength and modulus, while impact strength and elongation at break reduced. Thermal study revealed no significant change in thermal properties with OMMT loadings. Exfoliated structure was observed from X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for <4 phr OMMT and was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images.


Corresponding author: Azman Hassan, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Polymer Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, e-mail:

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation, Malaysia, for funding this project under e-Science Grant (Vote No 79367).

References

[1] Chow WS, Mohd Ishak ZA. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2007, 1, 77–83.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Utracki LA. Clay-Containing Polymeric Nanocomposites. Vol. 1. Rapra Technology Ltd.: UK, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tjong SC. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2006, 53, 73–197.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Othman N, Hassan A, Rahmat AR, Wahit MU. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2007, 15, 217–227.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kusmono, Mohd Ishak ZA, Chow WS, Takeichi T, Rochmadi. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 1023–1039.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Contreras V, Cafiero M, Da Silva S, Rosales C, Perera R, Matos M. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2006, 46, 1111–1120.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Baldi F, Bignotti F, Tieghi G, Riccò T. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 99, 3406–3416.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mishra S, Sonawane SS, Shimpi NG. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 46, 222–225.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang L, Wan C, Zhang Y. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009, 49, 209–216.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wang K, Wang C, Li J, Su J, Zhang Q, Du R, Fu Q. Polymer 2007, 48, 2144–2154.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.01.070Search in Google Scholar

[11] Xie BH, Yang MB, Li SD, Li ZM, Feng JM. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88, 398–403.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ahn YC, Paul DR. Polymer 2006, 47, 2830–2838.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.074Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kelnar I, Khunová V, Kotek J, Kaprálková L. Polymer 2007, 48, 5332–5339.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.062Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lim JW, Hassan A, Rahmat AR, Wahit MU. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 99, 3441–3450.Search in Google Scholar

[15] González I, Eguiazábal JI, Nazábal J. J. Polym. Sci Part B Polym. Phys. 2005, 43, 3611–3620.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Wu G, Xu H, Zhou T. Polymer 2010, 51, 3560–3567.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.05.058Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yoksan R. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 2008, 42, 325–332.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Nouparvar H, Hassan A, Mohamad Z, Wahit MU. J. Elastomers Plast. 2012. doi:10.1177/0095244312468365.10.1177/0095244312468365Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tanrattanakul V, Sungthong N, Raksa P. Polym. Test. 2008, 27, 794–800.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Nematzadeh N, Wahit MU, Hassan A, Mahmoudian S. Key Eng. Mater. 2011, 471–472, 518–523.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Teh PL, Mohd Ishak ZA, Hashim AS, Karger-Kocsis J, Ishiaku US. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 2513–2521.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Varghese S, Karger-Kocsis J, Gatos KG. Polymer 2003, 44, 3977–3983.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00358-6Search in Google Scholar

[23] Pal K, Rajasekar R, Kang DJ, Zhang ZX, Kim JK, Das CK. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 4035–4042.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Rajasekar R, Nayak GC, Das CK. Rubber Compos. 2011, 40, 146–155.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mohamad Z, Ismail H, Ratnam CT. Polym. Test. 2008, 27, 480–490.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Wahit MU, Hassan A, Mohd ishak ZA, Rahmat AR, Abu Bakar A. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2006, 19, 545–567.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Chavarria F, Paul DR. Polymer 2004, 45, 8501–8515.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.074Search in Google Scholar

[28] Chiu FC, Lai SM, Chen YL, Lee TH. Polymer 2005, 46, 11600–11609.10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.077Search in Google Scholar

[29] Liu T, Ping Lim K, Chauhari Tjiu W, Pramoda KP, Chen Z-K. Polymer 2003, 44, 3529–3535.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00252-0Search in Google Scholar

[30] Sinha Ray S, Okamoto M. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1539–1641.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Pramoda KP, Liu T, Liu Z, He C, Sue HJ. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2003, 81, 47–56.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Hassan A, Wahit MU, Chee CY. Polym. Test. 2003, 22, 281–290.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-3-19
Accepted: 2013-10-10
Published Online: 2013-11-22
Published in Print: 2014-02-01

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 2.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2013-0066/html
Scroll to top button