Time to compile: A performance installation as human-robot interaction study examining self-evaluation and perceived control

References

[1] F. Anstey, Vice versâ, or, A lesson to fathers, Smith, Elder, 1882, 1Search in Google Scholar

[2] N. Tucker, Vice versa: The first subversive novel for children, Children’s Literature in Education, 1987, 18(3), 39–14710.1007/BF01130992Search in Google Scholar

[3] I. F. of Robotics, 31 million robots helping in households worldwide by 2019, tech. rep., International Federation of Robotics, https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/31-millionrobots-helping-in-households-worldwide-by-2019, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[4] N. N. Television, Nielsen estimates 119.6 million tv homes, Nielsen Insights, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[5] P. R. Center, Mobile fact sheet, Washington: Pew Research Center, 2018Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Steinfeld, et al., Common metrics for human-robot interaction, In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, 2006, 33–4010.1145/1121241.1121249Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. Bartneck, D. Kulić, E. Croft, S. Zoghbi, Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2009, 1(1), 71–8110.1007/s12369-008-0001-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] B. Reeves, C. I. Nass, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, Cambridge University Press, 1996Search in Google Scholar

[9] C. Nass, Y. Moon, N. Green, Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 27(10), 864–87610.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.xSearch in Google Scholar

[10] F. Eyssel, D. Kuchenbrandt, Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership, British Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 51(4), 724–73110.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] F. Eyssel, F. Hegel, (S)he’s got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots 1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012, 42(9), 2213–223010.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] C. D. Kidd, C. Breazeal, Effect of a robot on user perceptions, In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004), IEEE, 2004, 4, 3559–3564Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Tamagawa, C. I. Watson, I. H. Kuo, B. A. MacDonald, E. Broad-bent, The effects of synthesized voice accents on user perceptions of robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2011, 3(3), 253–26210.1007/s12369-011-0100-4Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Saerbeck, C. Bartneck, Perception of affect elicited by robot motion, In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, IEEE Press, 2010, 53–6010.1109/HRI.2010.5453269Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Heimerdinger, A. LaViers, Influence of environmental context on recognition rates of stylized walking sequences, In: A. Kheddar et al. (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10652, Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_27Search in Google Scholar

[16] C. Bartneck, T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, K. Kato, Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots, In: Proceedings of Symposium on Robot Companions (SSAISB 2005 Convention), 2005, 1–4Search in Google Scholar

[17] C. Bartneck, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, T. Nomura, The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots, AI & Society, 2007, 21, 217–23010.1007/s00146-006-0052-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. Forlizzi, C. DiSalvo, Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the Roomba vacuum in the home, In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, 2006, 258–26510.1145/1121241.1121286Search in Google Scholar

[19] R. Hortensius, E. S. Cross, From automata to animate beings: The scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 201810.31234/osf.io/sr2c8Search in Google Scholar

[20] N. Suzuki, C. Bartneck, Subtle expressivity for characters and robots, In: CHI’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2003, 1064–106510.1145/765891.766150Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Pelachaud, Studies on gesture expressivity for a virtual agent, Speech Communication, 2009, 51(7), 630–63910.1016/j.specom.2008.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Flemisch, A. Viergutz, R. Dachselt, Easy authoring of variable gestural expressions for a humanoid robot, In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, 2014, 328–32810.1145/2559636.2559786Search in Google Scholar

[23] H. Knight, R. Simmons, Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban effort features for mobile robots, In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE, 2014, 267–27310.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926264Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. Smith, M. Anderson, Automation in everyday life, Washington: Pew Research Center, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Ledbetter, America’s top fears 2015, Chapman University Blog, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. J. Bryson, The past decade and future of AI’s impact on society, 2019Search in Google Scholar

[27] K. Goldberg, R. Siegwart, Beyond Webcams: An introduction to online robots, MIT Press, 200210.7551/mitpress/1588.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[28] S. Miller, J. Van Den Berg, M. Fritz, T. Darrell, K. Goldberg, P. Abbeel, A geometric approach to robotic laundry folding, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2012, 31(2), 249–26710.1177/0278364911430417Search in Google Scholar

[29] S. J. Burton, A.-A. Samadani, R. Gorbet, D. Kulić, Laban movement analysis and affective movement generation for robots and other near-living creatures, In: Dance Notations and Robot Motion, Springer, 2016, 25–4810.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_2Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. Gemeinboeck, R. Saunders, Creative machine performance: Computational creativity and robotic art, In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2013), 2013, 215–219Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. Egerstedt, T. Murphey, J. Ludwig, Motion programs for puppet choreography and control, In: A. Bemporad, A. Bicchi, G. Buttazzo (Eds.), Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4416, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-71493-4_17Search in Google Scholar

[32] E. Jochum, J. Schultz, E. Johnson, T. Murphey, Robotic puppets and the engineering of autonomous theater, In: A. LaViers, M. Egerstedt (Eds.), Controls and Art. Springer, Cham, 2014, 107–12810.1007/978-3-319-03904-6_5Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. Nakaoka, A. Nakazawa, K. Yokoi, H. Hirukawa, K. Ikeuchi, Generating whole body motions for a biped humanoid robot from captured human dances, In: Proceedings of 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’03), IEEE, 2003, 3, 3905–3910Search in Google Scholar

[34] P. Gemeinboeck, R. Saunders, Towards socializing non-anthropomorphic robots by harnessing dancers’ kinaesthetic awareness, In: International Workshop in Cultural Robotics, Springer, 2015, 85–9710.1007/978-3-319-42945-8_8Search in Google Scholar

[35] A. LaViers, L. Teague, M. Egerstedt, Style-based robotic motion in contemporary dance performance, In: A. LaViers, M. Egerstedt (Eds.), Controls and Art, Springer, Cham, 201410.1007/978-3-319-03904-6Search in Google Scholar

[36] E. Jochum, E. Vlachos, A. Christoffersen, S. G. Nielsen, I. A. Hameed, Z.-H. Tan, Using theatre to study interaction with care robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2016, 8(4), 457–47010.1007/s12369-016-0370-ySearch in Google Scholar

[37] S. Bianchini, F. Levillain, A. Menicacci, E. Quinz, E. Zibetti, Towards behavioral objects: A twofold approach for a system of notation to design and implement behaviors in non-anthropomorphic robotic artifacts, In: J.P. Laumond, N. Abe (Eds.), Dance Notations and Robot Motion, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 111, Springer, ChamSearch in Google Scholar

[38] F. B. Gilbreth, L. M. Gilbreth, Applied motion study: A collection of papers on the efficient method to industrial preparedness, Macmillan, 1919Search in Google Scholar

[39] G. Johansson, Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis, Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 14(2), 201–21110.3758/BF03212378Search in Google Scholar

[40] W. H. Dittrich, Action categories and the perception of biological motion, Perception, 1993, 2(1), 15–2210.1068/p220015Search in Google Scholar

[41] F. Loula, S. Prasad, K. Harber, M. Shiffrar, Recognizing people from their movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005, 3(1), 21010.1037/0096-1523.31.1.210Search in Google Scholar

[42] B. R. Duffy, Anthropomorphism and the social robot, Robotics and autonomous systems, 2003, 42(3-4), 177–19010.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3Search in Google Scholar

[43] T. Schiphorst, A case study of Merce Cunningham’s use of the LifeForms computer choreographic system in the making of trackers, PhD thesis, Arts and Social Sciences: Special Arrangements, 1993Search in Google Scholar

[44] M. Nyman, Experimental music: Cage and beyond, vol. 9. Cambridge University Press, 1999Search in Google Scholar

[45] A. Schöllig, F. Augugliaro, R. D’Andrea, A platform for dance performances with multiple quadrocopters, In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Workshop on Robots and Musical Expressions, 2010, 1–8Search in Google Scholar

[46] A. Schöllig, F. Augugliaro, R. D’Andrea, A platform for dance performances with multiple quadrocopters, Improving Tracking Performance by Learning from Past Data, 2012, 147Search in Google Scholar

[47] H. Knight, R. Simmons, An intelligent design interface for dancers to teach robots, In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), IEEE, 2017, 1344–135010.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172479Search in Google Scholar

[48] N. T. Fitter, H. Knight, N. Martelaro, D. Sirkin, What actors can teach robots, In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2017, 574–58010.1145/3027063.3027078Search in Google Scholar

[49] L. Noy, E. Dekel, U. Alon, The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together, In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(52), 20947–2095210.1073/pnas.1108155108Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] P. Slowinski, E. Rooke, M. Di Bernardo, K. Tanaseva-Atanasova, Kinematic characteristics of motion in the mirror game, In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), IEEE, 2014, 748–75310.1109/SMC.2014.6974000Search in Google Scholar

[51] C. Zhai, F. Alderisio, P. Slowinski, K. Tsaneva-Atanasova, M. di Bernardo, Modeling joint improvisation between human and virtual players in the mirror game, 2015, arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.05619Search in Google Scholar

[52] D. C. Reiizes, E. J. Mutran, M. E. Fernandez, Middle-aged working men and women: Similar and different paths to selfesteem, Research on Aging, 1994, 16(4), 355–37410.1177/0164027594164001Search in Google Scholar

[53] D. N. Smith, The relationship between academic major, self-esteem and body-esteem in nonclinical, undergraduate college women, PhD thesis, Georgia State University, 1995Search in Google Scholar

[54] J. A. McMullin, J. Cairney, Self-esteem and the intersection of age, class, and gender, Journal of Aging Studies, 2004, 18(1), 75–9010.1016/j.jaging.2003.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[55] A. C. Keller, L. L. Meier, S. Gross, N. K. Semmer, Gender differences in the association of a high quality job and self-esteem over time: A multiwave study, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2015, 24(1), 113–12510.1080/1359432X.2013.865118Search in Google Scholar

[56] S. Sprecher, J. E. Brooks, W. Avogo, Self-esteem among young adults: Differences and similarities based on gender, race, and cohort (1990–2012), Sex Roles, 2013, 69(5-6), 264–27510.1007/s11199-013-0295-ySearch in Google Scholar

[57] P. Dijkstra, D. P. Barelds, O. van Brummen-Girigori, Weight-influenced self-esteem, body comparisons and body satisfaction: Findings among women from the Netherlands and Curacao, Sex Roles, 2015, 73(7-8), 355–36910.1007/s11199-015-0528-3Search in Google Scholar

[58] C. Kontra, S. Goldin-Meadow, S. L. Beilock, Embodied learning across the life span, Topics in Cognitive Science, 2012, 4(4), 731–73910.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01221.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] G. Downey, ’Practice without theory’: a neuroanthropological perspective on embodied learning, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2010, 16, S22–S4010.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01608.xSearch in Google Scholar

[60] R. Lindgren, M. Johnson-Glenberg, Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality, Educational Researcher, 2013, 42(8), 445–45210.3102/0013189X13511661Search in Google Scholar

[61] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, A. LaViers, Time to compile: An interactive art installation, Intersections: 16th Biennial Symposium, The Ammerman Center for Arts and Technology, 201810.1145/3212721.3212888Search in Google Scholar

[62] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, E. Berl, A. LaViers, CURTAIN and time to compile: A demonstration of an experimental testbed for human-robot interaction, In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, 2018, 255–26110.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525520Search in Google Scholar

[63] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, A. LaViers, Perception of control in artificial and human systems: A study of embodied performance interactions, In: International Conference on Social Robotics, Springer, 2018, 503–51210.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_49Search in Google Scholar

[64] C. Cuan, I. Pakrasi, A. LaViers, Time to compile, In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing (MOCO’18), ACM, 201810.1145/3212721.3212888Search in Google Scholar