Abstract
This paper gives an outline of the Modular Theory of Writing Systems by answering the question: what are the elements or modules that are necessary for a writing system to work? A writing system is a notational system for a natural language. Based on this characterization, it is obvious that a necessary component of a writing system is a specific language system. What eventually constitutes a writing system in addition to this language system is a device that, put simply, relates units of a language system to units of a script. This component is termed ‘graphematics’ in the present framework and is regarded as a necessary module of a writing system. Above that, another typical component of writing systems, namely ‘systematic orthography’, applies to the ‘graphematic solution space’ and restricts the spelling possibilities of specific words in accordance to their belonging to a specific level of the vocabulary of the language. Supplemented by reflections on the status of scripts as well as of IPA as a writing system, an answer is finally given to the pertinent question how spoken language and written language are related to each other. The answer is that this relation is of a considerably indirect nature.
References
Althaus, Hans Peter. 1980. Graphetik. In Hans Peter Althaus, Helmut Henne, Herbert E. Wiegand (eds.), Lexikon der germanistischen Linguistik. 2nd edition. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 138-142. Search in Google Scholar
Appelt, Annalen, Miriam Balestra, Martin Neef. 2015. Orthographic constraints on the spelling of German a-sounds. Written Language and Literacy 18 (1), pp. 153-174. Search in Google Scholar
Balestra, Miriam, Annalen Appelt, Martin Neef. 2014. Systematische Beschränkungen für den orthographischen Wortschatz des Deutschen: der Konsonant [f]. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 33 (2), pp. 129-163. Search in Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Search in Google Scholar
Boltz, William G. 1996. Early Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels, William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191-199. Search in Google Scholar
Bredel, Ursula. 2008. Die Interpunktion des Deutschen: ein kompositionelles System zur Online-Steuerung des Lesens (Linguistische Arbeiten 522). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Search in Google Scholar
Bredel, Ursula. 2011. Interpunktion (Kurze Einführungen in die germanistische Linguistik 11). Heidelberg: Winter Search in Google Scholar
Carney, Edward. 1994. A survey of English spelling. London, New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1999. The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford, Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118932667Search in Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 2003. Writing systems: an introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164597Search in Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter. 2006. On beyond alphabets. In Martin Neef, Guido Nottbusch (eds.), Script adjustment and phonological awareness. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 9 (1), pp. 7-24. Search in Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. 2009. Grammatology. In David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25-45. Search in Google Scholar
Duden. 1984. Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th edition. Mannheim, Wien, Zürich: Dudenverlag. Search in Google Scholar
Duden. 2001. Deutsches Universalwörterbuch. 4th edition. Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, Zürich: Dudenverlag. Search in Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa. 2012. Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik (UTB 3740). 4th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Search in Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1983. Orthografie und Schriftsystem. In Klaus B. Günther, Hartmut Günther (eds.), Schrift, Schreiben, Schriftlichkeit. Arbeiten zur Struktur, Funktion und Entwicklung schriftlicher Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 41-68. Search in Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 2011. Das Fremdwort im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110235654Search in Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 2013. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort. 4th edition. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler. 10.1007/978-3-476-00757-5Search in Google Scholar
Forster, Iris, Susanne R. Borgwaldt, Martin Neef. 2012. Form follows function: interjections and onomatopoetica in comics. Writing Systems Research 4 (1), pp. 122-139. Search in Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan. 2011. Phonologie. Eine Einführung. 2nd edition. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215885Search in Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 2009. Speech and writing. In David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46-58. Search in Google Scholar
[IPA]. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to use the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[IPA]. 2010 (1949). Principles of the International Phonetic Association. London: University College London. Reproduced in: Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40 (3), pp. 299-358. Search in Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1981. Language and other abstract objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. Search in Google Scholar
Katz, Leonard, Laurie Feldman. 1983. Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 9, pp. 157-166. Search in Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 2014. Sprachwandel: von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache (UTB 1567). 4th edition. Tübingen: Francke. 10.36198/9783838542539Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical Morphology and Phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 3-91. Search in Google Scholar
Kluge. 2011. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25th edition. Edited by Elmar Seebold. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar
Lai, Pak-Keung, Dit-Yan Yeung, Man-Chi Pong. 1996. A heuristic search approach to Chinese glyph generation using hierarchical character composition. Computer Processing of Oriental Languages 10, pp. 306-323. Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Sang-Oak. 2009. The Korean alphabet: an optimal featural system with graphical ingenuity. In Sang-Oak Lee (ed.), Writing systems and linguistic structure. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 12 (2), pp. 202-212. Search in Google Scholar
Mair, Victor H. 1996. Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels, William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 200-208. Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul Georg et al. 2005. Synchronic English linguistics: an introduction. 3rd edition. Tübingen: Narr. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 1999. The syllable peak adjacency constraint. In Hans Otto Spillmann, Ingo Warnke (eds.), Internationale Tendenzen der Syntaktik, Semantik und Pragmatik. Akten des 32. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Kassel 1997 (Linguistik International 1). Frankfurt/ Main etc.: Peter Lang, pp. 323-331. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2004. Graphematik und Orthographie: ein zweistufiges Modell der Analyse von Schriftsystemen. Estudios Filologicos Alemanes 5, pp. 133-156. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2005. Die Graphematik des Deutschen (Linguistische Arbeiten 500). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110914856Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2010. Die Schreibung nicht-nativer Einheiten in einer Schriftsystemtheorie mit einem mehrschichtigen Wortschatzmodell. In Anke Holler, Carmen Scherer (eds.), Strategien der Integration und Isolation nicht-nativer Einheiten und Strukturen (Linguistische Arbeiten 532). Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 11-29. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2012. Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research 4 (1), pp. 214-228. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2013. Das Konzept des morphologischen Prinzips und seine Rolle in einer modularen Schriftsystemtheorie. In Martin Neef, Carmen Scherer (eds.), Die Schnittstelle von Morphologie und geschriebener Sprache (Linguistische Arbeiten 551). Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 9-36. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2014. Das nächste Paradigma: Realistische Linguistik. Eine Ergänzung zum Beitrag Wo stehen wir in der Grammatiktheorie? von Wolfgang Sternefeld und Frank Richter. Muttersprache 124 (2), pp. 105-120. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin, Miriam Balestra. 2011. Measuring graphematic transparency: German and Italian compared. In Susanne R. Borgwaldt, Terry Joyce (eds.), Typology of writing systems. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 14 (1), pp. 109-142. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin, Anneke Neijt, Richard Sproat. 2002. Introduction. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt, Richard Sproat (eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language (Linguistische Arbeiten 460). Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 1-7. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin, Heinz Vater. 2006. Concepts of the lexicon in theoretical linguistics. In Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), Advances in the theory of the lexicon (Interface Explorations 13). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 27-55. Search in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin, Rüdiger Weingarten. 2012ff. Schriftlinguistik. (Wörterbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Online 5). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar
Nerius, Dieter (ed.). 2007. Deutsche Orthographie. 4th edition. Hildesheim: Olms. Search in Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1990. The linguistics of punctuation. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information. Search in Google Scholar
Nunn, Anneke. 1998. Dutch orthography: a systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. Search in Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1985. Writing systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. Search in Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard. 2000. A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Unger, J. Marshall. 2011. What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? Written Language and Literacy 14(2), pp. 293-302. Search in Google Scholar
Unseth, Peter (ed.). 2008. The sociolinguistics of script choice. Special issue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language 192. 10.1515/IJSL.2008.030Search in Google Scholar
Venezky, Richard. 1970. The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110804478Search in Google Scholar
Venezky, Richard. 1999. The American way of spelling. New York, London: Guilford. Search in Google Scholar
Venezky, Richard. 2004. In search of the perfect orthography. In Martin Neef, Beatrice Primus (eds.), From letter to sound. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 7 (2), pp. 139-163. Search in Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo, Joachim Jacobs. 1982. Sprache und Grammatik. Grundprobleme der linguistischen Sprachbeschreibung (Erträge der Forschung 176). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Search in Google Scholar
Weingarten, Rüdiger. 2011. Comparative graphematics. In Susanne R. Borgwaldt, Terry Joyce (eds.), Typology of writing systems. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 14 (1), pp. 12-38. Search in Google Scholar
Wiebelt, Alexandra. 2004. Do symmetrical letter pairs affect readability? A cross-linguistic examination of writing systems with specific reference to the runes. In Martin Neef, Beatrice Primus (eds.), From letter to sound. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 7 (2), pp. 275-304. Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 Martin Neef
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
