Abstract
This article examines the acquisition of pragmatic competence in L2, applying this stimulating area of research to premodern texts in a way that has yet to be done (to the author’s knowledge). Specifically, this article discusses the teaching of “challenging” incongruent speech behaviours (such as sarcasm, banter, and irony) in a group of Anglo-Norman dialogues of the late Middle Ages. The present work focuses on the representation of incongruent speech acts in the dialogues, how this representation speaks to a pedagogical method that incorporated humour, and also the possible functions of humour in the pedagogical environment. The topic of incongruent performance and its pedagogical implications will also be considered. By discussing the depiction and role of incongruent speech behaviours in the dialogues, I argue that these texts were sophisticated teaching aides that may have used humour as a pedagogical tool to teach more difficult elements of language use.
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2010. Linguistic theories of humour. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219029Search in Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Banas, John A., Norah Dunbar, Dariela Rodriguez & Shr-Jie Liu. 2011. A review of humor in educational settings: four decades of research. Communication Education 60(1). 115–144.10.1080/03634523.2010.496867Search in Google Scholar
Barbe, Katharina. 1995. Irony in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.34Search in Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2010. Exploring the pragmatics of interlanguage pragmatics: Definition by design. In A. Trosborg (ed.), Handbook of pragmatics, 219–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214444.2.219Search in Google Scholar
Bayless, Martha. 1996. Parody in the middle ages: The Latin tradition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14561Search in Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy. 2012. Comparing playful and nonplayful incidental attention to form. Language Learning 62. 236–265.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00630.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy & Salvatore Attardo. 2010. Failed humor: Issues in non-native speakers’ appreciation and understanding of humor. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(3). 423–447.10.1515/iprg.2010.019Search in Google Scholar
Benson, Larry D. (ed.). 2008 [1987]a. The Pardoner’s Tale. In The Riverside Chaucer, 196–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Benson, Larry D. (ed.). 2008 [1987]b. Troilus and Criseyde. In The Riverside Chaucer, 473–585. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beyer, Katrin. 2014. Wit and irony - rhetorical strategies and their performance in political and learned communication in England (1066–1259). In Niels Gaul & Michael Grunbart Sita Steckel (eds.), Networks of learning: Perspectives on scholars in Byzantine East and Latin West, 147–159. Berlin: Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Blumenfeld-Kosinski, Renate (ed.). 1997. The selected writings of Christine de Pizan: New translations, criticism. New York and London: Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Butterfeld, Ardis. 2009. The familiar enemy: Chaucer, language and nation in the hundred years war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574865.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cannon Willard, Charity (ed.). 1989. Le Livre des trois vertus. Édition critique. Paris: H. Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Cheney Curnow, Maureen. 1975. The Livre de la Cité des Dames of Christine de Pisan: A critical edition. Nashville: Vanderbuilt University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Andrew. 2017. Teaching and learning second language pragmatics. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. 3, 325–326. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Critten, Rory. 2015. Practicing French conversation in fifteenth-century England. The Modern Language Review 110(4). 927–945.10.5699/modelangrevi.110.4.0927Search in Google Scholar
Critten, Rory. 2018a. The Manières de langage as evidence for the use of spoken French within fifteenth-century England. Forum for Modern Language Studies. doi:10.1093/fmls/cqy066 (accessed 20 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Critten, Rory. 2018b. French Didactics in late medieval and early modern England: Thinking historically about method. In Nicola McLelland & Richard Smith (eds.), The history of language learning and teaching: 16th–18th century Europe, Vol. 1, 33–51. Cambridge: Legenda.10.2307/j.ctv16km0ns.6Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349–367.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: ‘The Weakest Link’. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 35–72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2010. Early modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Alison Mackey & Naoko Taguchi (eds.). 2018. Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315692388Search in Google Scholar
Day, Mabel (ed.). 1957 [1952]. The English text of the Ancrene Riwle: Edited from Cotton MS Nero A.xiv. London: Early English Text Society.Search in Google Scholar
Denoyelle, Corinne. 2013. Marques d’Oralité en Français Médiéval. In Amalia Rodríguez Somolinos (ed.), Diachroniques: Les Marques de l’oralité en français médiéval 3, 119–147. Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, Irina. 2011. Violence, performance, and pedagogy in Aelfric Bata’s Colloquies. Exemplaria 23(1). 67–91.10.1179/104125711X12864610741783Search in Google Scholar
Furnivall, Frederick J. (ed.). 1901. Robert of Brunne’s Handlyng Synne. London: Early English Text Society.Search in Google Scholar
Gallagher, John. 2014. Vernacular language-learning in early modern England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Garner, R. L. 2006. Humor in Pedagogy: How Ha-Ha can Lead to Aha! College Teaching 54(1). 177–180.10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180Search in Google Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam. 1998. Understanding metaphors. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7(2). 39–43.10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175582Search in Google Scholar
Goel, Vinod & Raymond J. Dolan. 2001. The functional anatomy of humor: Segregating cognitive and affective components. Nature Neuroscience 4(3). 237–238.10.1038/85076Search in Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Derek Bousfield. 2012. Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9). 1099–1114.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003Search in Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2013. Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity. Journal of Pragmatics 59. 57–67.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2011. Genres and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1). 327–346.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.016Search in Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2015. The maintenance of French in later medieval England. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 115(4). 425–448.Search in Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin. 1994. The making of textual culture: ‘Grammatica’ and literary theory 350–1100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking fast and slow, 1st edn. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni. 2011. Irony via ‘surrealism’. In Dynel Marta (ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains, 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.210.05kapSearch in Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele & Carsten Roever. 2005. Pragmatics in Second Language Learning. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 317–334. New York and London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & R. Schmidt. 1996. Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18. 149–169.10.1017/S0272263100014868Search in Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan, Robert E. Sanders & Anita Pomerantz. 2018. The basic interactional competence of language learners. Journal of Pragmatics 124. 88–105.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.019Search in Google Scholar
Keil, H. (ed.). 1864. Grammatici latini, Vol. 4. 367–402. Leipzig: Lipsiae.Search in Google Scholar
Kibbee, Douglas A. 1991. For to Speke Frenche Trewely: The French language in England, 1000–1600. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.60Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Jiyun. 2014. How Korean EFL learners understand sarcasm in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics 60. 193–206.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.016Search in Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 1996. Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica 30. 299–325.10.1515/flin.1996.30.3-4.299Search in Google Scholar
Kristol, Andres. 1992. ‘Que dea! Mettes le chapron, paillard, com tu parles a prodome!’ La representation de l’oralité dans les Manières de langage du XIVe/XVe siècle. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 43. 35–64.10.1515/9783110244991.35Search in Google Scholar
Kristol, Andres (ed.). 1995. Manières de langage (1396, 1399, 1415). London: Anglo Norman Text Society.Search in Google Scholar
Kristol, Andres. 2001. Le ms. lat. 188 de Magdalen College Oxford : une “pierre de Rosette” de l’enseignement médiéval du français en Angleterre? Vox Romanica 60. 149–167.Search in Google Scholar
Lagorgette, Dominique. 2013. Insultes et registres de langue dans les Manières de langage: Transgression et effets d’oralité. In Diachroniques: Les Marques de l’oralité en français médiéval 3, 119–147. Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principals of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Lusignan, Serge. 1986. Parler vulgairement: Les intellectuals et la langue française aux XIIIe et XlVe siècles. Paris: J. Vrin. Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Search in Google Scholar
Lusignan, Serge. 2004. La Langue des rois au Moyen Âge. Le français en France et en Angleterre. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar
Males, Mikael (ed.). 2018. Etymology and wordplay in medieval literature. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.DISPUT-EB.5.113328Search in Google Scholar
Merrileess, Brian & Beata Sitarz-Fitzpatrick (eds.). 1993. Liber Donati. A fifteenth-century manual of French. London: Anglo-Norman Text Society.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, Sarah. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238Search in Google Scholar
Münster-Swendsen, Mia. 2014. The Use of Emotions in the North-European School Milieus, c.1000–1200. In Sita Steckel, Niels Grünbart & Michael Gaul (eds.), Networks of learning: Perspectives on scholars in Byzantine east and Latin west, 161–184. Berlin: Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, James J. 1967. Literary implications of instruction in the verbal arts in fourteenth-century England. Leeds Studies in English 1. 119–135.Search in Google Scholar
Orme, Nicholas. 2006. Medieval Schools. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Paris, Gaston & Ulysse Robert (eds.). 1878. Miracle de Theodore. In Miracles de Nostre Dame par personnages, publ. d’après le manuscrit de la Bibliothèque Nationale, 69–133. Paris: F. Didot.Search in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humour. Dordrecht, Boston, and Lancaster: D. Reidel.Search in Google Scholar
Rothwell, William. 1968. The teaching of French in medieval England. Modern Language Review 63. 37–46.10.2307/3722642Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, James R. 2011. Humour and the Obscene. In William Burgwinkle, Nicholas Hammond & Emma Wilson (eds.), The Cambridge history of french literature, 111–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521897860.014Search in Google Scholar
Sommer, H. O. (ed.). 1894. The recuyell of the historyes of troy. London: D. Nutt.Search in Google Scholar
Sowards, J. K. (ed.). 1985. Collected works of Erasmus: Literary and educational writings, Vol. 25. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Strick, Madelijn, Rob Holland, Rick van Baaren & Ad Van Knippenberg. 2010. Humor in the eye tracker: Attention capture and distraction from context cues. Journal of General Psychology 137. 37–48.10.1080/00221300903293055Search in Google Scholar
Sullivan, Paul. 2008. Playing the lord: Tudor Vulgaria and the rehersal of ambition. ELH 75(1). 179–196.10.1353/elh.2008.0000Search in Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. & E. V. Gordon (eds.). 1967. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar
Veale, Tony & Alessandro Valitutti. 2017. Tweet dreams are made of this: Appropriate incongruity in the dreamwork of language. Lingua 197. 141–153.10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.004Search in Google Scholar
Wilcox, Jonathan (ed.). 2000. Humour in Anglo-Saxon literature. Cambridge: Brewer.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Graham. 2012. Searching for verbal irony in historical corpora: A pilot study of mock and scorn in the corpus of middle English prose and verse. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English. 11.Search in Google Scholar
Wise, Roy A. 2004. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5. 483–494.10.1038/nrn1406Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
