Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter July 9, 2016

Organotin(IV) scorpionates – X-ray structure and crystal packing of TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu) [Tp=hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate]

  • Jéremy Lange , Hélène Cattey and Laurent Plasseraud EMAIL logo

Abstract

Reaction of potassium hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate (KTp) and n-BuSnCl3 at room temperature led to the quantitative formation of TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu) (1). Colorless single crystals were obtained from a mixture of toluene/dichloromethane and were characterized as TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu)·½ toluene. Complex 1 crystallizes in the triclinic P1̅ space group, with Z=2, a=8.0496(8) Å, b=9.4867(9) Å, c=14.2710(14) Å, α=90.365(3)°, β=104.479(3)°, γ=95.066(3)°, and V=1050.60(18) Å3. Its structure exhibits a piano stool conformation involving a distorted octahedral geometry around the central Sn(IV) atom. In the crystal and from a supramolecular point of view, 1 is organized in pairs according to a V-shaped arrangement implicating pyrazolyl rings and through weak intermolecular interactions (π-π, C-H···π, and C-H···Cl). The structural analysis of 1 was completed by infrared and solution NMR spectroscopy measurements as well as elemental analysis, which confirm the X-ray elucidation.

Introduction

During the 1990s, organotin(IV) derivatives of polypyrazolylborates [also called scorpionates by Trofimenko (1999)] were intensively studied. The group of Gioia Lobbia was particularly productive and active in this field describing the synthesis and the solid-state characterization of many examples of organotin(IV) polypyrazolylborates (Gioia Lobbia et al., 1991, 1992, 1995a,b, 1996; Calogero et al., 1996). In addition to structural considerations relevant in coordination chemistry, these compound aroused a great interest owing to their potential biological activity, qualified of antimutagenic properties (Zaidi et al., 1988). Thereafter and in connection with organometallic chemistry considerations, Tani and Mashima showed that Tp*Sn(Cl)nBu3-n complexes could be efficiently employed as reagents for the preparation of group 4 (Zr) and group 5 (Nb, Ta) hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borates (Mashima et al., 1997; Oshiki et al., 2000). Other research groups have then applied this useful method for the preparation of new transition metal (Oulié et al., 2005; Tang et al., 2011; Yuan and Chen, 2011) and rare earth pyrazolate derivatives (Beaini et al., 2008).

During our ongoing studies in the organotin(IV) chemistry field (Plasseraud and Cattey, 2013; Diallo et al., 2014), we reported recently the reactivity of Tp*Sn(Cl)2Bu [Tp*=hydrido-tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate] with NaOH in a mixture of acetone/water leading to the unusual dimeric complex [(Me2CO)3(NaTp*)2] (Plasseraud and Cattey, 2014). By seeking to extend this reaction to other organotin precursors, we prepared the complex TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu) (1) for which single crystals, suitable for an X-ray crystallographic analysis, were obtained in a mixture of toluene/dichloromethane by slow vapor phase diffusion at room temperature. Although the synthesis of 1 was described in the past by Gioia Lobbia et al. (1991), it seemed interesting to complete the characterization by describing its hitherto unknown crystal structure. Indeed, although several methyl and phenyl derivatives are known and identified as CCDC references [Sn(Cl)2Me moiety=YIVVOO (Gioia Lobbia et al., 1995a), ROPGEI (Calogero et al., 1996); Sn(Cl)2Ph moiety=PARPON (Gioia Lobbia et al., 1992), ZOFDON (Gioia Lobbia et al., 1995b), TOGKEF (Gioia Lobbia et al., 1996)], only one n-butyl example of dichloro tin(IV) scorpionate has been crystallographically characterized to date (CCDC reference=QEYHOR; Oshiki et al., 2000). In 1990, Jung and coworkers reported also the X-ray crystal structures of two tris(pyrazolyl)borate complexes of 3-methoxy-3-oxopropyltin(IV), CH3OOCCH2Sn((pz)3BH)X2 [X=Cl (CCDC reference=JIBRAN), NCS (CCDC reference=JIBRER)] (Jung et al., 1990). Experimentally, the title compound was obtained by reacting potassium hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate (KTp) with n-BuSnCl3 at room temperature, in dichloromethane solution (Scheme 1). Crystallographic data and crystal packing of 1 are reported and discussed herein.

Scheme 1: Synthetic pathway showing the molecular representations of KTp and 1.
Scheme 1:

Synthetic pathway showing the molecular representations of KTp and 1.

Crystals of 1 were first investigated by infrared spectroscopy (ATR mode, Figure S1), and the spectrum was compared with that of the KTp precursor. The significant shift of the ν(B-N) band to higher frequency compared with KTp (2512 vs. 2400 cm-1) constitutes the most notable change, which can be attributed to the coordination of Tp to Sn atom. Additional vibration bands are also observed in the range of 2850–3000 cm-1 corresponding to ν(C-H) absorptions characteristic of a n-butyl chain bonded to Sn. The structure of 1 was then confirmed in the solid state by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. Selected crystallographic data and refinement details are reported in experimental section. An Ortep view with selected bond lengths and angles [Å, °] is shown in Figure 1. In the unit cell, one molecule of toluene co-crystallizes with two molecules of 1. A Sn(Cl)2(n-Bu) moiety is linked to one hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate ligand, which adopts a classic tridentate facial coordination mode [Sn-N1 2.2638(13), Sn-N3 2.2457(13), and Sn-N5 2.1958(13) Å]. Thus, the tin atom is six-coordinated in a distorted octahedral environment [N5-Sn-C10 172.99(5)°]. The coordination sphere around the tin atom is completed by two chlorine atoms located in the equatorial plane [Sn-Cl1 2.4353(4) and Sn-Cl2 2.4406(4) Å] and one carbon atom of the n-C4H9 chain occupying an axial position [Sn-C10 2.1442(15) Å]. The resulting structure described a piano stool conformation, classically observed for tris(pyrazolyl)borate complexes. Furthermore, the CHN elemental analysis performed on crystals also supports the formula of 1.

Figure 1: Molecular structure of TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu)·toluene (1) showing 40% probability ellipsoids and the crystallographic numbering scheme (Ortep view in Olex2).Atom color code: B, yellow; N, blue; Cl, green; C, gray; H, white; Sn, turquoise. Selected bond lengths and angles [Å, °]: Sn-Cl1=2.4353(4), Sn-Cl2=2.4406(4), Sn-N1=2.2638(13), Sn-N3=2.2457(13), Sn-N5=2.1958(13), Sn-C10=2.1442(15), N1-N2=1.3677(18), N3-N4=1.3642(18), N5-N6=1.3661(18), N2-B=1.546(2), N4-B=1.543(2), N6-B 1.545(2); Cl1-Sn-Cl2=96.008(15), N1-Sn-Cl1=91.64(4), N3-Sn-N1=80.83(5), N3-Sn-Cl2=88.91(3), N5-Sn-C10=172.99(5), N5-Sn-Cl1=86.62(4), N5-Sn-Cl2=87.53(3), N5-Sn-N1=79.37(5), N5-Sn-N3=81.17(5), C10-Sn-Cl1=97.34(5), C10-Sn-Cl2=97.77(5), C10-Sn-N1=94.68(6), C10-Sn-N3=94.29(6), N2-N1-Sn=121.75(9), N4-N3-Sn=122.45(10), N6-N5-Sn=122.35(9), N1-N2-B=120.41(12), N3-N4-B=120.20(12), N5-N6-B=121.48(12).
Figure 1:

Molecular structure of TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu)·toluene (1) showing 40% probability ellipsoids and the crystallographic numbering scheme (Ortep view in Olex2).

Atom color code: B, yellow; N, blue; Cl, green; C, gray; H, white; Sn, turquoise. Selected bond lengths and angles [Å, °]: Sn-Cl1=2.4353(4), Sn-Cl2=2.4406(4), Sn-N1=2.2638(13), Sn-N3=2.2457(13), Sn-N5=2.1958(13), Sn-C10=2.1442(15), N1-N2=1.3677(18), N3-N4=1.3642(18), N5-N6=1.3661(18), N2-B=1.546(2), N4-B=1.543(2), N6-B 1.545(2); Cl1-Sn-Cl2=96.008(15), N1-Sn-Cl1=91.64(4), N3-Sn-N1=80.83(5), N3-Sn-Cl2=88.91(3), N5-Sn-C10=172.99(5), N5-Sn-Cl1=86.62(4), N5-Sn-Cl2=87.53(3), N5-Sn-N1=79.37(5), N5-Sn-N3=81.17(5), C10-Sn-Cl1=97.34(5), C10-Sn-Cl2=97.77(5), C10-Sn-N1=94.68(6), C10-Sn-N3=94.29(6), N2-N1-Sn=121.75(9), N4-N3-Sn=122.45(10), N6-N5-Sn=122.35(9), N1-N2-B=120.41(12), N3-N4-B=120.20(12), N5-N6-B=121.48(12).

Moreover, the examination of the crystal packing highlights that molecules of 1 are associated by pairs in the crystal. The resulting supramolecular organization shown in Figure 2 can be viewed as a V-shaped assembly, based on intermolecular interactions implicating two of the three pyrazolyl rings of each molecule. Thus, the two pyrazolyl rings formed by N5, N6, C7, C8, and C9 atoms (Ct2 and Ct2i in Figure 2) of two symmetric molecules are implicated in a parallel displaced π-π contacts. The interplanar distance between the rings is 3.383 Å. The pyrazolyl rings are slipped by 0.928 Å (slip angle 15.34°), and the centroid-centroid distance is 3.508(1) Å, which is consistent with the range of parameters observed previously for such π-π stacking involving aromatic nitrogen-containing ligands (Janiak, 2000). In addition, the resulting V-shaped assembly is also stabilized by two intermolecular C-H···π contacts oriented in antiparallel directions and involving again the pyrazolyl rings, respectively, between C8 and the centroid formed by N3, N4, C4, C5, and C6 atoms (Ct1) and between C6 and the centroid formed by the toluene molecule (Ct3). The C-H-centroid distances are respectively equal to 3.4733(17) and 3.9157(20)° Å with the corresponding C-H-centroid angle equal to 145.88° and 148.80°. These values are in the range of those typically identified for this type of weak interactions (Nishio, 2004). In the past, such comparable supramolecular architectures have been already reported in the literature, for example, by Marjo et al. (1994) and Reger et al. (2003), for dibromide quinoline and tris(pyrazolyl)methane derivatives, respectively. However, and to our knowledge, they remain relatively rare. Interestingly and beyond this first stage of supramolecular organization, both chlorine ligands linked to the tin atom are also engaged in intermolecular C-H···Cl interactions with pyrazolyl rings of neighboring pairs [C4-H4···Cl1=3.5362(17) Å, C3-H3···Cl2=3.7351(17) Å, and C9-H9···Cl2=3.6589(16) Å] (Thallapally and Nangia, 2001). Thus, the combination of all of these intermolecular interactions leads to the propagation of a three-dimensional network depicted in Figure S2.

Figure 2: The V-shaped organization of 1 stabilized by π-π (), C-H···π (), and C-H···Cl () intermolecular interactions (Olex2 View).Symmetry translation: (i) x, 1+y, z; (ii) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; (iii) 1+x, y, z.
Figure 2:

The V-shaped organization of 1 stabilized by π-π (

), C-H···π (
), and C-H···Cl (
) intermolecular interactions (Olex2 View).

Symmetry translation: (i) x, 1+y, z; (ii) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; (iii) 1+x, y, z.

In solution, compound 1 is well soluble in chlorinated organic solvents and poorly in aromatics. 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra in CD2Cl2 show the characteristic signals of pyrazolyl and n-C4H9 groups, confirming the respective 1:1 ratio groups (Figures S3 and S4, respectively). The 119Sn{1H} NMR spectrum in CD2Cl2 exhibits only one resonance at -485.6 ppm (SnMe4 as external reference, Figure S5), corroborating the six-coordinate tin complexes, and shows that the structure determined at the solid state is maintained in solution. Even after an extended stay (several days), no alteration or modification is observed, which expresses a good stability of the coordination complex.

As already mentioned and to the best of our knowledge, 1 represents to date only the second example of a crystallographically characterized n-butyl dichloro tin(IV) scorpionate. Some structural data of 1 and its Tp* analogue [Tp*=Tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)hydroborate] are compared in Table 1.

Table 1:

Comparison of Sn-Cl, Sn-N, and Sn-C bond lengths (Å), and Cl-Sn-Cl angles (deg) in Tp*Sn(Cl)2(n-Bu) (Oshiki et al., 2000) and TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu) (1).

CompoundsSn-Cl (Å)Sn-N (Å)Sn-C (Å)Cl-Sn-Cl (deg)CSD identifier
Tp*Sn(Cl)2(n-Bu)2.424(2)2.224(4)2.162(4)91.55(5)QEYHOR
(Oshiki et al., 2000)2.437(2)2.247(4)
2.279(4)
TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu) (1)2.4406(5)2.1958(13)2.1442(15)96.008(15)(This work)
2.4353(4)2.2638(13)
2.2457(13)

A marked difference was observed in particular for the Cl-Sn-Cl angle, which is significantly more open in the case of 1. The extension of this comparison to Cl2RSn pyrazolylborate complexes shows that such angle value is unusual, which is generally <95° (Gioia Lobbia et al., 1996) and could be directly related to the close crystal packing involving the both chlorine atoms of 1.

Experimental

General

Potassium hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate (KTp, 93% purity) and n-butyltin trichloride (n-BuSnCl3, 95% purity) were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium) and Sigma-Aldrich (Lyon, France), respectively, and were used without any further purification. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vector 22 spectrometer (Wissembourg, France) equipped with a Specac Golden Gate™ ATR device. The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III NanoBay 300-MHz spectrometer with a wide band sensor broad band fluorine observation (BBFO). 1H and 13C{1H} chemical shifts (δ, ppm) were determined from the residual solvent signal (CH2Cl2δ=5.32 and CH2Cl2δ=53.84). 119Sn{1H} chemical shifts (δ, ppm) were reported downfield from (CH3)4Sn used as external standard. Elemental analyses were performed at the Institut de Chimie Moléculaire (Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France) using a Thermo Electron CHNS/O Flash EA 112 Series analyzer.

Synthesis and crystallization of TpSn(Cl)2(n-Bu) (1)

Equimolar solutions of potassium hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate (0.200 g, 0.793 mmol) and n-butyltin trichloride (0.224 g, 0.793 mmol) in dichloromethane (25 mL) were mixed together at room temperature. A white precipitate is quickly obtained, which is then filtered off (through Celite) after one night stirring. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure giving a solid white residue. Colorless crystals, suitable for an X-ray crystallographic analysis, were grown by vapor phase diffusion of toluene into a dichloromethane solution and were finally characterized as 1 (0.292 g, 73% yield).

1H{11B}-NMR (CD2Cl, 300 K): δ=0.94 (t, 3H, n-Bu, -CH3), 1.43 (m, 2H, n-Bu, -CH2-), 1.70–2.20 (m, 4H, n-Bu, -CH2-), 4.59 (s, br, pz-BH), 6.28–6.38 (m, 3H, pz-CH), 7.60–8.25 (m, 6H, pz-CH). 13C{1H} (CD2Cl, 300 K): δ=141.6 (pz-CH), 140.4 (pz-CH), 136.3 (pz-CH), 136.0 (pz-CH), 106.0 (pz-CH), 105.5 (pz-CH), 39.2 (n-Bu, -CH2-), 28.4 (n-Bu, -CH2-), 26.1 (n-Bu, -CH2-), 13.8 (n-Bu, -CH3). δ=11B{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 300 K): δ=-4.81 (BH). δ=119Sn{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2, 300 K): δ=-485.5. IR (ATR, cm-1): 3112 (w), 2958 (w), 2929 (w), 2870 (w), 2512 (w), 1504 (m), 1404 (m), 1387 (m), 1310 (s), 1212 (s), 1118 (m), 1050 (s), 983 (s), 772 (s), 708 (s), 655 (m), 615 (m). Anal. Calcd. for C13H15BCl2N6Sn·0.5C7H8 (505.81): C 39.18, H 4.58, N 16.61. Found: C 38.91; H 4.71; N 16.29.

X-ray crystallography

A single colorless prism-shaped crystal (0.38×0.22×0.18 mm) was selected and used for data collection using a Bruker D8 Venture triumph Mo diffractometer equipped with an Oxford Cryosystems low-temperature apparatus operating at T=100 K. Data were measured using MoKα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å). The total number of runs and images was based on the strategy calculation from the program Apex2 (Bruker, 2014). Cell parameters were retrieved and refined using the Saint software (Bruker, 2014). Data reduction was performed using the Saint software, which corrects for Lorentz polarization. The structure was solved by direct methods using the Shelxt structure solution program (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by full matrix least squares on F2 using Shelxl (Sheldrick, 2015b) with the aid of the Olex2 program (Dolomanov et al., 2009). All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atom positions were calculated geometrically and refined using the riding model. The toluene molecule is located on an inversion center.

Selected crystallographic parameters of 1: Formula C13H19BCl2N6Sn·0.5(C7H8), M=505.81 g mol-1, a=8.0496(8) Å, b=9.4867(9) Å, c=14.2710(14) Å, α=90.365(3)°, β=104.479(3)°, γ=95.066(3)°, V=1050.60(18) Å3, Dcalcd=1.599 g cm-3, μ=1.484 mm-1, Z=2, triclinic, space group P1̅, 44 013 reflections collected (index ranges: h: -10, 10; k: -12, 12; l: -18, 18), 4854 independent (Rint=0.0224) and 4854 observed reflections [I≥ 2σ(I)], 258 refined parameters, 0 restraints, R indices for observed reflections: R1=0.0172, wR2=0.0391, R indices for all data: R1=0.0192, wR2=0.0404, goodness-of-fit=1.103, maximum residual electron density 0.815 and -0.331 e Å-3.

CCDC 1474180(1) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, France) and the University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté (Dijon, France).

References

Beaini, S.; Deacon, G. B.; Delbridge, E. E.; Junk, P. C.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H. Dimethyltin(IV) bis(3,5-diphenylpyrazolate) as a synthetic reagent in the preparation of rare-earth pyrazolate complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2008, 4586–4596.10.1002/ejic.200800642Search in Google Scholar

Bruker V8.34A. Apex2 and Saint, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, S.; Valle, G.; Gioia Lobbia, G.; Santini, C.; Cecchi, P.; Stievano, L. Organotin(IV) polypyrazolylborates. XII. Hydridotris(4-bromo-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)borates: characterization, Mössbauer study and X-ray crystal structure of MeCl2Sn(4-BrPz)3BH. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 526, 269–277.10.1016/S0022-328X(96)06567-9Search in Google Scholar

Diallo, W.; Diop, L.; Plasseraud, L.; Cattey, H. [n-Bu2NH2]3[SnPh3 (SeO4)2]: The first triorganotin(IV) complex with terminally coordinated selenato ligands. Main Group Met. Chem.2014, 37, 107–112.10.1515/mgmc-2014-0011Search in Google Scholar

Dolomanov, O. V.; Bourhis, L. J.; Gildea, R. J.; Howard, J. A. K.; Puschmann, H. Olex2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program, J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341.10.1107/S0021889808042726Search in Google Scholar

Gioia Lobbia, G.; Bonati, F.; Cecchi, P.; Lorenzotti, A.; Pettinari, C. Organotin(IV) polypyrazolylborates III. Tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borates. J. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 403, 317–323.10.1016/0022-328X(91)86478-9Search in Google Scholar

Gioia Lobbia, G.; Calogero, S.; Bovio, B.; Cecchi, P. Mössbauer and NMR study of tin(IV) and organotin(IV) hydridotris(3-Me-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)borates. The X-ray crystal structure of phenyldichlorotin(IV) derivative. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 440, 27–40.10.1016/0022-328X(92)83481-VSearch in Google Scholar

Gioia Lobbia, G.; Cecchi, P.; Spagna, R.; Colapietro, M.; Pifferi, A.; Pettinari, C. Organotin(IV) polypyrazolylborates VII. Hydridotris (3,4,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)borates. X-ray crystal structures of K(HB(3,4,5-Me3Pz)3] and [HB(3,4,5-Me3Pz)3SnMeCl2]. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995a, 485, 45–53.10.1016/0022-328X(94)05003-TSearch in Google Scholar

Gioia Lobbia, G.; Cecchi, P.; Calogero, S.; Valle, G.; Chiarini, M.; Stievano, L. Organotin(IV) polypyrazolylborates VIII. Hydridotris (4-chloro-3,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)borates. Characterization, Mössbauer study and X-ray crystal structures of [SnCl3{HB(4-Cl-3,5-Me2Pz)3] and [PhSnCl2{HB(4-Cl-3,5-Me2Pz)}3]. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995b, 503, 297–305.10.1016/0022-328X(95)05557-6Search in Google Scholar

Gioia Lobbia, G.; Valle, G.; Calogero, S.; Cecchi, P.; Santini, C.; Marchetti, F. Trichloro-, mono-, di- and tri-organotin(IV) derivatives of hydridotris(4-methylpyrazol-1-yl)borates. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 2475–2483.10.1039/dt9960002475Search in Google Scholar

Janiak, C. A critical account on π-π stacking in metal complexes with aromatic nitrogen-containing ligands. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 3885–3896.10.1039/b003010oSearch in Google Scholar

Jung, O.-S.; Jeong, J. H.; Sohn, Y. S. Tris(pyrazolyl)borate complexes of 3-methoxy-3-oxopropyltin(IV). Crystal structure and properties of CH3OOCCH2Sn((pz)3BH)X2 (X=Cl, NCS). J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 399, 235–246.10.1016/0022-328X(90)85488-KSearch in Google Scholar

Marjo, C. E.; Bishop, R.; Craig, D. C.; O’Brien, A.; Scudder, M. L. Use of halogen sensor groups for specific trapping of polyhaloalkanes. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2513–2514.10.1039/c39940002513Search in Google Scholar

Mashima, K.; Oshiki, T.; Tani, K. Tp*Sn(Cl)Bu2 as a convenient reagent for the preparation of hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate complexes of niobium, tantalum, and zirconium. Organometallics1997, 16, 2760–2762.10.1021/om9701175Search in Google Scholar

Nishio, M. CH/π hydrogen bonds in crystals. CrystEngComm. 2004, 6, 130–158.10.1039/b313104aSearch in Google Scholar

Plasseraud, L.; Cattey, H. New acridinium trifluoromethanesulfonate stacks induced in the presence of organotin(IV) complexes. Comptes Rendus Chimie2013, 16, 613–620.10.1016/j.crci.2012.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Plasseraud, L.; Cattey, H. A Novel Alkali-metal hydridotris(pyrazolyl)borate (Tp*) complex. Isolation and crystal structure of [(Me2CO)3(NaTp*)2]. Z. Naturforsch.2014, 69b, 793–798.10.5560/znb.2014-4066Search in Google Scholar

Oshiki, T.; Mashima, K.; Kawamura, S.-I.; Tani, K.; Kitaura, K. Substituent effect on organotin Tp* compounds as the Tp* reagent for the preparation of mono Tp* complexes of group 4–6 metals (Tp*=Tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)hydroborate). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2000, 73, 1735–1748.10.1246/bcsj.73.1735Search in Google Scholar

Oulié, P.; Brefuel, N.; Vendier, L.; Duhayon, C.; Etienne, M. A new way to scorpionate niobium complexes: terminal alkyne, imido, and oxo complexes and the rearrangement of α-agostic ethyl complexes. Organometallics2005, 24, 4306–4314.10.1021/om050423fSearch in Google Scholar

Reger, D. L.; Semeniuc, R. F.; Smith, M. D. Structurally adaptive multitopic ligands containing tris(pyrazolyl)methane units as supramolecular synthons: manganese carbonyl complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 666, 87–101.10.1016/S0022-328X(02)02043-0Search in Google Scholar

Sheldrick, G. M. Shelxt. Acta Cryst. 2015a, A71, 3–8.10.1107/S2053273314026370Search in Google Scholar

Sheldrick, G. M. Shelxl, Acta Cryst. 2015b, C71, 3–8.10.1107/S2053229614024218Search in Google Scholar

Tang, M.; Li, D.; Mallik, U. P.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Clérac, R.; Yee, G. T.; Whangbo, M.-H.; Mungalimane, A.; Holmes, S. M. Synthesis and characterization of di- and trivalent pyrazolylborate β-diketonates and cyanometalates. Inorg. Chem.2011, 50, 5153–5164.10.1021/ic200464tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Thallapally, P. K.; Nangia, A. A Cambridge Structural Database analysis of the C–H···Cl interaction: C–H···Cl2 and C–H···Cl–M often behave as hydrogen bonds but C–H···Cl–C is generally a van der Waals interaction. CrystEngComm.2001, 27, 1–6.10.1039/B102780HSearch in Google Scholar

Trofimenko, S. Scorpionates: The Coordination Chemistry of Polypyrazolylborate Ligands, Imperial College Press: London, 1999.10.1142/p148Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, L.-L.; Chen, C. Dichlorido(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole-κN2)[hydrotris(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl-κN2)borato]chromium(III) tetrahydrofuran monosolvate. Acta Crystallogr.2011, E67, m349.10.1107/S1600536811005344Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zaidi, A. A.; Hashmi, A.; Siddiqi, K. S. Characterization and antimutagenic activity of di- and triorganotin(IV) chelates with pyrazolylborate. J. Chem. Res. 1988, 410–411.Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/mgmc-2016-0018) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2016-4-25
Accepted: 2016-6-9
Published Online: 2016-7-9
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2016-0018/html
Scroll to top button