Abstract
This paper analyses the impact of landscape on linguistic and cognitive spatial frames of reference (FoRs) in three generations of speakers of Negev Arabic (NA): Traditional (TNA), Middle (MNA), and Young (YNA). When locating one object (the figure) with respect to a reference object (the ground), TNA strategies rely on pragmatic properties attributed to the ground (e.g. familiarity) and to axial constraints (alignment between figure, ground, and the observer’s visual field). When the ground is familiar and asymmetrical, intrinsic FoR is preferred; when it is familiar and symmetrical, a Speech Act Participant (SAP)-landmark strategy is preferred if figure, ground, and observer are aligned, otherwise absolute FoR is used; when the ground is unfamiliar, absolute FoR is preferred. Absolute FoR is not used in MNA, while in egocentric reference, a relative reflection strategy is used. MNA applies right–left distinctions using reflection and rotation strategies. YNA uses intrinsic FoR and relative reflection without predicable rules; absolute FoR and SAP-landmark FoR are absent; and the right–left axis applies to all ground objects. All generations apply geocentric FoRs in non-linguistic tasks within the Negev region, but outside this region, each used different strategies. Negev landscapes are fundamental constituents of NA FoRs across generations.
Funding source: Israel Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003977
Award Identifier / Grant number: Grant no. 680/17
Acknowledgments
My sincere thanks go to the anonymous reviewers and to the editors of this volume for their valuable suggestions, and in particular to Prof. Bill Palmer, for his sustained guidance and support.
-
Research funding: This research was financially supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant no. 680/17.
References
Blanc, Haim. 1970. The Arabic dialect of the Negev Bedouins. Jerusalem: IASH.Search in Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2011. Spatial FoRs in Yucatec: Referential promiscuity and task specificity. Language Sciences 33. 892–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.009.Search in Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2012. A vector space semantics for reference frames in Yucatec. In Elizabeth Bogal-Allbritten (ed.), Proceedings of the sixth meeting on the semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas (SULA 6) and SULA-Bar, 15–34. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Carolyn O’Meara. 2012. Vectors and frames of reference: Evidence from Seri and Yucatec. In Luna Filipović & Kasia Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures, 217–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.37.16bohSearch in Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 2006. Language, culture and cognition: The view from space. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 34. 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl.2006.005.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1993. “Uphill” and “downhill” in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3. 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.46.Search in Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Stephen Levinson. 2008. Language and landscape: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences 30(2/3). 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.028.Search in Google Scholar
Calderón, Eréndira, Stefano De Pascale & Evangelia Adamou. 2019. How to speak “geocentric” in an “egocentric” language: A multimodal study among Ngigua-Spanish bilinguals and Spanish monolinguals in a rural community of Mexico. Language Sciences 74. 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.001.Search in Google Scholar
Cerqueglini, Letizia. 2015. Object-based selection of spatial frames of reference in aṣ-Ṣāniʿ Arabic. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cerqueglini, Letizia. 2019. Spatial frames of reference in Traditional aṣ-Ṣāniʕ Arabic: Preliminary observations of language-to-cognition correlation. Saggi e Studi Linguistici 57(1). 71–127.Search in Google Scholar
Cerqueglini, Letizia & Roni Henkin. 2016. Spatial language and culture: Cardinal directions in Negev Arabic. Anthropological Linguistics 58(2). 171–208. https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2016.0026.Search in Google Scholar
Cerqueglini, Letizia & Roni Henkin. 2018. Referential complementarity in Traditional Negev Arabic. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 10. 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1163/18766633-00901002.Search in Google Scholar
Dasen, Pierre & Ramesh Mishra. 2010. Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition: An eco-cultural perspective (Cambridge Studies in Cognitive and Perceptual Development). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761058Search in Google Scholar
Dunn, Vivien, Felicity Meakins & Cassandra Algy. 2021. Acquisition or shift: Interpreting variation in Gurindji children’s expression of spatial relations. In Enoch Aboh, Michael DeGraff & Cécile Vigouroux (eds.), Variation rolls the dice, 105–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/coll.59.05dunSearch in Google Scholar
Henkin, Roni. 2010. Negev Arabic: Dialectal, sociolinguistic, and stylistic variation. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Leslie & Eugene Hunn. 2010. Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space (Studies in Environmental Anthropology and Ethnobiology 14). New York: Berghahn Books.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1996. Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology 25. 353–382. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, Penelope Brown, Eve Danziger, Lourdes de León, John Haviland, Eric Pederson & Gunter Senft. 1992. Man and tree & space games. In Stephen Levinson (ed.), Space stimuli kit 1.2: November 1992, 7–14. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83(3). 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00009-4.Search in Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel Haun & Stephen Levinson. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
Mark, David, Barry Smith & Barbara Tversky. 1999. Ontology and geographic objects: An empirical study of cognitive categorization. In Christian Freksa & David Mark (eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 1661), 283–298. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/3-540-48384-5_19Search in Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2011. Spaced out: Inter-generational changes in the expression of spatial relations by Gurindji people. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31(1). 43–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2011.532857.Search in Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity & Cassandra Algy. 2016. Deadly reckoning: Changes in Gurindji children’s knowledge of cardinals. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36(4). 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1169973.Search in Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh, Pierre Dasen & Shanta Niraula. 2003. Ecology, language, and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology 38. 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000187.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Randi & Jürgen Bohnemeyer. 2016. The effect of topography on language and cognition in Isthmus Zapotec. Paper presented at the international conference “Geographic Grounding: Place, Direction and Landscape in the Grammars of the World”, University of Copenhagen.Search in Google Scholar
O’Meara, Carolyn. 2010. Seri landscape classification and spatial reference. Buffalo: University at Buffalo PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill. 2015. Topography in language: Absolute frame of reference and the Topographic Correspondence Hypothesis. In Rick de Busser & Randy LaPolla (eds.), Language structure and environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors, 177–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/clscc.6.08palSearch in Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill, Alice Gaby, Jonathon Lum & Jonathan Schlossberg. 2018. Diversity in spatial language within communities: The interplay of culture, language and landscape in representations of space. In Stephan Winter, Monika Sester & Amy L. Griffin (eds.), 10th International conference on geographic information science, 53:1–53:8. Wadern: Schloss Dagstuhl.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill, Dorothea Hoffmann, Joe Blythe, Alice Gaby, Bill Pascoe & Maïa Ponsonnet. 2021. Frames of spatial reference in five Australian languages. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2021.1929239.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill, Jonathon Lum, Jonathan Schlossberg & Alice Gaby. 2017. How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. Linguistic Typology 21(3). 457–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0011.Search in Google Scholar
Pederson, Eric. 1993. Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In Andrew Frank & Irene Campari (eds.), Spatial information theory, 294–311. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/3-540-57207-4_20Search in Google Scholar
Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David Wilkins, Stephen Levinson, Sotaro Kita & Gunter Senft. 1998. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74. 557–589. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0074.Search in Google Scholar
Polian, Gilles & Jürgen Bohnemeyer. 2011. Uniformity and variation in Tseltal reference frame use. Language Sciences 33. 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.010.Search in Google Scholar
Schlossberg, Jonathan. 2018. Atolls, islands and endless suburbia: Space and landscape in Marshallese. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/37316327/Atolls_Islands_and_Endless_Suburbia_space_and_landscape_in_Marshallese_talk.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Barry & David Mark. 2003. Do mountains exist? Towards an ontology of landforms. Environment and Planning B 30(3). 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12821.Search in Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wassmann, Jurg & Pierre Dasen. 1998. Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence of moderate linguistic relativity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4. 689–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034828.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
