Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 18, 2019

The relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes to British accents in enhancing the persuasiveness of children’s oral health campaigns

  • Zoe Adams EMAIL logo
From the journal Linguistics Vanguard

Abstract

This paper seeks to improve the persuasiveness of oral health campaigns by investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes to British accents. Forty-seven participants from Tayside, East Scotland, first completed an implicit task which asked participants to judge the truth value of 120 trivia statements, divided into six different accents, as quickly as possible. This was complimented by an identical written task at the end of the experiment in less pressurised conditions. Both audio and written responses to the statements were analysed using signal detection theory, which revealed that Estuary English was more persuasive than the local accent, Dundee English (p = 0.039), and the stigmatised multi-ethnolect, Multicultural London English (p = 0.002). Participants also completed an explicit task involving two matched-guise tests with the same six accents in a neutral and dental context. Results update our knowledge of explicit attitudes to British accents in a modern linguistic landscape, and shed light on correlations between implicit and explicit attitudes. Using Bassili and Brown’s (2005) Potentiated Recruitment Framework, it is argued that the relationship is mediated by participants’ self-presentation concerns and the perceived social penalties of expressing bias. Sociolinguistic implications of implicit measurement procedures are discussed regarding the development of oral health campaigns.

References

Abdi, Hervé. 2007. Signal detection theory. In Neil Salkind (ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics, 1–9. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Altendorf, Ulrike. 2003. Estuary English: Levelling at the interface of RP and south-eastern British English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Alvarez-Mosquera, Pedro & Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez. 2017. Implicit language attitudes toward historically white accents in the South African context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 37(2). 1–11.10.1177/0261927X17718349Search in Google Scholar

Bargh, John A. 1994. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In Robert S. Wyer Jr & Thomas K. Skrull (eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes, 1–40. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Bassili, John & Richard Brown. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Dolores Albarracín, Blair T. Johnson. & Mark P. Zanna (eds.), The handbook of attitudes, 543–574. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Search in Google Scholar

Berlo, David K., James B. Lemert & Robert J. Mertz. 1969. Dimensions of evaluating acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly 33(4). 563–576.10.1086/267745Search in Google Scholar

Bodenhausen, Gawronski, Andrew Todd & Jennifer A. Richeson. 2009. Controlling prejudice and stereotyping: Antecedents, mechanisms and contexts. In Todd Nelson (ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, 111–130. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2012. The implicit association test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua 122(7). 753–763.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2008. Ethnicity, friendship network and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica 22. 1–23.10.1515/9783484605299.1Search in Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15. 151–196.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.xSearch in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas & Hywel Bishop. 2007. Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(1). 74–93.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00311.xSearch in Google Scholar

De Houwer, Jan, Niclas Heider, Adriaan Spruyt, Arne Roets & Sean Hughes. 2015. The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure. Frontiers in Psychology 6(319). 1–9.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00319Search in Google Scholar

Fabricus, Anne. 2006. The ‘vivid sociolinguistic profiling’ of Received Pronunciation: Responses to gendered dialect-in-discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1). 111–122.10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00320.xSearch in Google Scholar

Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland & Angie Williams. 2003. Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(3). 411–414.Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard. 1971. Patterns of evaluation to R.P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 10(3). 280–281.10.1111/j.2044-8260.1971.tb00748.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gimson, Alfred C. 1970. An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Greenwald, Anthony, Debbie E. McGhee & Jordan Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6). 1464–1480.10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464Search in Google Scholar

Heeger, David. 2003. Signal detection theory. http://www.cns.nyu.edu/ david/handouts/sdt/sdt.html (Accessed 1st February 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Hiraga, Yuko. 2005. British attitudes towards six varieties of English in the USA and Britain. World Englishes 24(3). 289–308.10.1111/j.0883-2919.2005.00411.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 2007. Standard and non-standard English. In David Britain (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 34–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620782.004Search in Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 2014. The objectification of ‘Jafaican’. The discoural embedding of Multicultural London English in the British media. In Jannis Androutsopoulos (ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346831.427Search in Google Scholar

Kinzler, Katherine, Kristin Shutts & Joshua J. Correll. 2010. Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology 40(4). 581–592.10.1002/ejsp.739Search in Google Scholar

Lalwani, Ashok, May Lwin & Kuah Leng Li. 2008. Consumer responses to English accent variations in advertising. Journal of Global Marketing 18(3–4). 143–165.10.1300/J042v18n03_07Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Wallace, Robert Hodgson, Robert Gardner & Steven Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 80(1). 44–51.10.1037/h0044430Search in Google Scholar

Lev-Ari, Shiri & Boaz Keysar. 2010. Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46. 1093–1096.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025Search in Google Scholar

Mai, Robert & Stefan Hoffmann. 2011. Four positive effects of a salesperson’s regional dialect in services selling. Journal of Service Research 14(4). 460–474.10.1177/1094670511414551Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Ron. 1988. The political economy of Britain’s North-South Divide. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 13(4). 389–418.10.2307/622738Search in Google Scholar

McCready, Richard B. 2008. Irish Catholicism and nationalism in Scotland: The Dundee experience, 1850–1922. Irish Studies Review 6(3). 245–252.10.1080/09670889808455609Search in Google Scholar

McKenzie, Robert & Erin Carrie. 2018. Implicit-explicit attitudinal discrepancy and the investigation of language attitude change in progress. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39(9). 830–844.10.1080/01434632.2018.1445744Search in Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris. 2012. The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(5). 638–668.10.1111/josl.12003Search in Google Scholar

Mugglestone, Linda. 1997. Talking proper: The rise of accent as a social symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Myles, John F. 2010. Bourdieu, language and the media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230283053Search in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Pantos, Andrew J. & Andrew W. Perkins. 2012. Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1). 3–20.10.1177/0261927X12463005Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, Gudrun. 1998. From “RP” to “Estuary English”: The concept ‘received’ and the debate about British pronunciation standards. Unpublished MA thesis, Hamburg University. https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/parsons_ma.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Perloff, Richard. 2010. The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429196959-2Search in Google Scholar

Petty, Richard E. & John Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19. 123–205.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2Search in Google Scholar

Pichler, Heike. 2016. Uncovering discourse-pragmatic innovations: innit in Multicultural London English. In Heike Pichler (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 59–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107295476.004Search in Google Scholar

Pine, Cynthia M, Pauline M. Adair, Alison D. Nicoll, Girvan Burnside, Poul E. Petersen, David Beighton, Angela Gillett, Ruth Anderson, Shahid Anwar, Susan Brailsford, Zdenek Broukal, Ivor G Chestnutt, Dominique Declerck, Feng X. Ping, Roberto Ferro, Ruth Freeman, Tshepo Gugushe, Rebecca Harris, Brent Lin, Edward C. M. Lo, Gerardo Maupome, Mohamed H. Moola, Sudeshni Naidoo, Francisco Ramos-Gomez, Lakshman P. Samaranayake, Swarngit Shahid, Marit S. Skeie, Christian Splieth, Betty King Sutton, Teo C. Soo & Helen Whelton. 2004a. International comparisons of health inequalities in childhood dental caries. Community Dental Health 21(1). 121–130.Search in Google Scholar

Pine, Cynthia M, Pauline M. Adair, Poul E. Petersen, Chester Douglass, Girvan Burnside, Alison D. Nicoll, Angela Gillett, Ruth Anderson, David Beighton, Bian Jin-you, Zdenek Broukal, John P. Brown, Ivor G Chestnutt, Dominique Declerck, Deidre Devine, Ivar Espelid, Guiliano Falcolini, Feng Xi Ping, Ruth Freeman, David Gibbons, Tschepo Gugusge, Rebecca Harris, Jennifer Kirkham, Edward C. M. Lo, Philip Marsh, Gerardo Maupomé, Sudeshni Naidoo, Francisco Ramos-Gomez, Betty King Sutton & Sonia Williams. 2004b. Developing explanatory models of health inequalities in childhood dental caries. Community Dental Health 21(1). 86–95.Search in Google Scholar

Pine, Cynthia, Pauline Adair, Louise Robinson, Girvan Burnside, Paula Moynihan, William Wade, James Kistler, Morag Curnow & Mary Henderson. 2016. The BBaRTS Healthy Teeth Behaviour Change Programme for preventing dental caries in primary school children: Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 17(103). 1–10.10.1186/s13063-016-1226-3Search in Google Scholar

Reinares-Lara Eva, Josefa D. Martín-Santana & Clara Muela-Molina. 2016. The effect of accent, differentiation and stigmatization on spokersperson credibility in radio advertising. Journal of Global Marketing 29(1). 15–28.10.1080/08911762.2015.1119919Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Milton. 1968. Hedonism, inauthenticity and other goads toward expansion of a consistency theory. In Robert P. Abelson, Elliot Aronson, William J. McGuire, Theodore M. Newcomb, Milton J. Rosenberg, & Percy H. Tannenbaum (eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook, 73–111. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Search in Google Scholar

Rosseel, Laura, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts. 2015. Can social psychological attitude measures be used to study language attitudes? A case study exploring the Personalized Implicit Association Test. Paper presented at 6th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics, Tubingen, 4–6 November.Search in Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Eliot R. 1996. What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(5). 893–912.10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.893Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Hayley-Jane & Lance Workman. 2008. The effect of accent on perceived intelligence and attractiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Dublin, April 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Received Pronunciation: Sociolinguistic aspects. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 36. 3–13.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter & Jean Hannah. 2017. A guide to varieties of English around the world. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315192932Search in Google Scholar

Unkelbach, Christian. 2007. Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology 33(1). 219–30.10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219Search in Google Scholar

Wells, John. C. 1997. What is Estuary English? English teaching professional 3. 46–47. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/whatis.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Wentura, Dirk & Juliane Degner. 2010. A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks. In Bertram Gawronski & Keith Payne (eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications, 95–116. New York: Guilford.Search in Google Scholar

Wittenbrink, Bernd, Charles M. Judd & Bernadette Park. 2001. Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(5). 815–827.10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.815Search in Google Scholar

Wotschke, Ingrid. 2014. How educated English speak English: Pronunciation as social behaviour. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Search in Google Scholar

Appendix A

Melbourne in Australia used to be named Batmania
Venezuela is named after Venice
Exodus is the first book of the Old Testament
Hippos can run faster than horses
The word goodbye comes from God be with you
The first remote control took eight seconds to change channels
In New York it is illegal to imitate an animal
Baseball originated in England
Sloths take two weeks to digest their food
Walt Disney was afraid of rollercoasters
Jacuzzi is a brand name
Nutmeg is poisonous if injected
Five percent of the worlds salt is for pretzels
An adult skeleton has 106 bones
Rats cry when they are tickled
Babies like high pitched singing voices
Baboons come from Africa and Arabia
Mexico’s most famous beer is Sol
The Sun is 1000 times larger than Earth
It takes one minute for brain cells to react to aspirin
Hot water is heavier than cold
Pluto was named by an 11 year old girl
French fries originated in Belgium
Pluto takes 248 years to orbit the Sun
The first text message read Happy New Years Eve
There are more than 50 different kinds of kangaroos
Hippos’ sweat turns red when they’re upset
The most popular male dog names are Max and Bailey
Bono was born Paul David Hewson
Tokyo is the city most prone to earthquakes
Humans develop a tail in the womb that dissolves
The most liked brand on Facebook is Starbucks
The film Titanic got three Oscars
Youtube started as a dating website
Karaoke means empty orchestra in Chinese
Dolphins sleep with one eye open
The lightest metal in the world is copper
Outer space is completely silent
Eating white chocolate helps eczema
Einstein failed Maths at school
India has four different time zones
It rains diamonds on Saturn
30 people have been born in Antarctica
Tom and Jerry were originally called Jasper and Jinx
The Great Wall of China can be seen from Space
George Bush and Hugh Hefner share common ancestors
30% of emails sent are spam
The majority of the Amazon rainforest is in Colombia
Ketchup was sold as a medicine in the early 19th century
Peanuts can be used to make dynamite
The most popular pin code is 1, 2, 3, 4
The sum of all the numbers on a roulette wheel is 666
Reno is farther west than Los Angeles
Vienna has the oldest zoo in the world
The first Olympics were held in Greece
Neptune is the equivalent of Greek God Aphrodite
Elvis Presley’s middle name is Aaron
Babies tend to cry in blue rooms
Gin is made from potatoes
Madrid is the noisiest city in the world
Grapes explode when microwaved
Issac Newton invented the game chequers
The world’s tallest building is in Dubai
Grapefruit dehydrates you
The largest recorded snowflake was 15 inches
A hurricane can be as high as 50,000 feet
Woman can read smaller print than men
Fortune cookies originated in Italy
The first sport to be filmed was baseball
Heart attacks occur most often on Mondays
The Titanic was built in Dublin
Cats have five eyelids
Sand is the main component in glass
25% of British people sleep nude
Texas is the largest state in America
M & Ms stands for Mars and Murries
A Cadburys Crème Egg contains 170 calories
Italy has 10% of the worlds active volcanoes
Florence Nightingale invented scissors
Jerry Springer was born at a tube station in North London
Milkshakes were originally alcoholic drinks
A bee is more likely to sting you in rainy weather
School comes from the Ancient Greek ‘skhole
China is the world’s largest producer of peanuts
Whoopi Goldberg’s first job was a baker in New York City
America is home to the first underground
25% of human bones are located in the spine
The American flag has 49 stars
Ciabatta bread was invented in 1500
Laughter can strengthen the immune system
You burn more calories sleeping than watching TV
Captain Morgan was a Welsh pirate
There are 100 different drink combinations at Starbucks
45% of the world is left handed.
Mercury is known as the red planet
The first mobile phone cost $4000
Google was launched in 1990
The giant panda is the national animal of Canada
Intelligent people have more magnesium in their hair
Police in India get paid more if they grow moustaches
It’s illegal to chew gum in Singapore
Popcorn is mostly eaten in Autumn
Mount Everest grows two inches every year
Yawning wakes you up
Antarctica was once as warm as California
Human blood has more calories than crisps
A group of crocodiles is called an embarrassment
Carrots were purple before the 12th century
In France, an ashtray is considered a deadly weapon
Humans need food more than they need sleep
The dot on the letter ‘i’ is called a tittle
Iceland’s national animal is the whale
Tea is the national drink of France
The first computer mouse was made of metal
The space between your fingers is called the glabella
In Spain artists can pay their taxes with artwork
Babies have more bones than adults
The Mojito cocktail originated in Argentina
A shrimp’s heart is in its head
Half your brain is used for vision

Appendix B

  1. Matched-guise test neutral passage

    I think the best way to get from Birmingham University to Cardiff University is to head west toward New Fosse Way. This will lead you to Bristol Road, where you need to continue for about 3 miles. At the roundabout take the second exit onto the M5 to London. After about 60 miles, exit onto the M4 towards South Wales. Continue onto Eastern Avenue and then take the A470 exit towards the City Centre. Merge onto North Road and turn left onto Corbett Road where Cardiff University is situated.

  2. Matched-guise test dental passage

    There are several ways you can avoid tooth decay. First you should brush your teeth twice a day for two minutes. Brushing your tongue will also freshen your breath and remove bacteria. Second, flossing helps prevent decay because it gets rid of plaque and food particles which a toothbrush cannot reach. Finally, it is important to avoid sugary food and drinks, and this also benefits your wider health. If you do have sugar, try to limit it to mealtimes rather than as a snack.

Received: 2018-03-06
Accepted: 2018-12-03
Published Online: 2019-04-18

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0008/html
Scroll to top button