Funding source: Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé
Award Identifier / Grant number: Not applicable
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: Prof. Maheux-Lacroix and Prof. Bujold hold research salary support from the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec-Santé.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Meyer, JA, Silverstein, J, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Antoine, C. The effect of uterine closure technique on cesarean scar niche development after multiple cesarean deliveries. J Perinat Med 2024;52:150–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0211.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Antoine, C, Meyer, JA, Silverstein, JS, Alexander, J, Oh, C, Timor-Tritsch, IE. The impact of uterine incision closure techniques on post-cesarean delivery niche formation and size: sonohysterographic examination of nonpregnant women. J Ultrasound Med 2022;41:1763–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15859.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Roberge, S, Demers, S, Girard, M, Vikhareva, O, Markey, S, Chaillet, N, et al.. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:507.e1–7.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Hayakawa, H, Itakura, A, Mitsui, T, Okada, M, Suzuki, M, Tamakoshi, K, et al.. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:429–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340500430436.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Roberge, S, Chaillet, N, Boutin, A, Moore, L, Jastrow, N, Brassard, N, et al.. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;115:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Bujold, E, Bujold, C, Hamilton, EF, Harel, F, Gauthier, RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1326–30. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.122416.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Bujold, E, Goyet, M, Marcoux, S, Brassard, N, Cormier, B, Hamilton, E, et al.. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e41be3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Guyot Cottrel, A. Essai CHORUS: comparaison de l’aspect échographique de la cicatrice de césarienne selon une fermeture utérine en un plan ou en deux plans. Paris, France: Faculté de médecine, Université Paris Descarte; 2011.Search in Google Scholar
9. Jastrow, N, Gauthier, RJ, Gagnon, G, Leroux, N, Beaudoin, F, Bujold, E. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:563.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.894.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Algert, CS, Morris, JM, Simpson, JM, Ford, JB, Roberts, CL. Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1061–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31818b42e3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
