Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 29, 2018

Stillbirths in women with pre-gravid obesity

  • Maja Dolanc Merc , Miha Lučovnik , Andreja Trojner Bregar , Ivan Verdenik , Nataša Tul and Isaac Blickstein EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objective

To determine the association between pre-gravid obesity and stillbirth.

Methods

A retrospective study of a population-based dataset of births at ≥34 weeks’ gestation. We excluded fetal deaths due to lethal anomalies and intrapartum fetal deaths. We calculated the incidence of stillbirths, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions per ongoing pregnancies for each gestational week in the two body mass index (BMI) categories (≥30 vs.<30).

Results

Pre-pregnancy obesity (BMI≥30), pre-pregnancy diabetes, oligo- and polyhydramnios, being small for gestational age (SGA) and preeclampsia were significantly associated with stillbirth. However, the only pre-gravid factor that is amenable to intervention was obesity [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20, 3.3]. The rates of stillbirth seem to increase with gestational age in both BMI categories. RDS and NICU admission would be presented.

Conclusion

Birth near term might reduce stillbirths and decrease NICU admissions occurring in term and in post-term obese women. This presumable advantage might be offset by the potential risk of labor induction and cesarean section among obese women. Women of childbearing age with a BMI≥30 should be counseled about these risks of obesity during pregnancy and childbirth.


Corresponding author: Isaac Blickstein, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Medical Center, affiliated with the Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel, Tel.: +972-545201789

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. De Bernis L, Kinney MV, Stones W, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Vivio D, Leisher SH, et al. Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2 Dec 2017]:387(10019):703–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00954-X.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00954-XSearch in Google Scholar

2. Frøen JF, Friberg IK, Lawn JE, Bhutta ZA, Pattinson RC, Allanson ER, et al. Stillbirths: progress and unfinished business. Lancet. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2 Dec 2017]:387(10018):574–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00818-1.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00818-1Search in Google Scholar

3. Manktelow BN, Smith LK, Alun Evans T, Hyman-Taylor P, Kurinczuk JJ, Field DJ, et al. Perinatal mortality surveillance report UK perinatal deaths for births from January to December 2013. Leicester: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester; 2015. 141 pp.Search in Google Scholar

4. MacDorman MF, Gregory EC. Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015;64:1–24.Search in Google Scholar

5. Joseph KS, Kinniburgh B, Hutcheon JA, Mehrabadi A, Basso M, Davies C, et al. Determinants of increases in stillbirth rates from 2000 to 2010. Can Med Assoc J 2013;185:345–51.10.1503/cmaj.121372Search in Google Scholar

6. Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, Burden C, Bhutta ZA, Cacciatore J, et al. Stillbirth: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2 Dec 2017]387(10018):604–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3Search in Google Scholar

7. Ramos Salas X. The ineffectiveness and unintended consequences of the public health war on obesity. Can J Public Health 2015;106:e79–81.10.17269/cjph.106.4757Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. World Health Organization. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland. 2006 [cited 27 April 2012]; Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/full_report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cnattingius S, Bergström R, Lipworth L, Kramer MS. Pre-pregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 1998;338:147–52.10.1056/NEJM199801153380302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Nohr EA, Bech BH, Davies MJ, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Pre-pregnancy obesity and fetal death: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:250–9.10.1097/01.AOG.0000172422.81496.57Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Bukowski R, Hansen NI, Pinar H, Willinger M, Reddy UM, Parker CB, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN). Altered fetal growth, placental abnormalities, and stillbirth. PLoS One 2017;12:e0182874.10.1371/journal.pone.0182874Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Kristensen J, Vestergaard M, Wisborg K, Kesmodel U, Secher NJ. Pre-pregnancy weight and the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:403–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00437.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Salihu HM, Dunlop AL, Hedayatzadeh M, Alio AP, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Extreme obesity and risk of stillbirth among black and white gravidas. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:552–7.10.1097/01.AOG.0000270159.80607.10Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2014;311:1536–46.10.1001/jama.2014.2269Search in Google Scholar

15. Mulherin K, Miller YD, Barlow FK, Diedrichs PC, Thompson R. Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:19.10.1186/1471-2393-13-19Search in Google Scholar

16. Lucovnik M, Tul N, Blickstein I. Obesity and pregnancy: implications for maternal and fetal outcomes. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2012;7:399–401.10.1586/eog.12.47Search in Google Scholar

17. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Women with Obesity in Pregnancy. March 2010 [cited 2 Dec 2017]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/cmacercogjointguidelinemanagementwomenobesitypregnancya.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kumari AS. Pregnancy outcome in women with morbid obesity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;73:101–7.10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00391-XSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-08-13
Accepted: 2018-10-29
Published Online: 2018-11-29
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2018-0266/html
Scroll to top button