Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 25, 2018

Evaluation of management and surgical outcomes in pregnancies complicated by acute cholecystitis

  • Amira El-Messidi , Ghazi Alsarraj , Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman , Daniel S. Mishkin and Haim Arie Abenhaim EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the management of pregnancies complicated by acute cholecystitis (AC) and determine whether pregnant women are more likely to have medical and surgical complications.

Methods:

We carried out a population-based matched cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2011. Pregnant women with AC were age matched to non-pregnant women with AC on a 1:5 ratio. Management and outcomes were compared using descriptive analysis and conditional logistic regression.

Results:

There were 11,835 pregnant women admitted with AC who were age matched to 59,175 non-pregnant women. As compared to non-pregnant women, women with AC were more commonly managed conservatively, odds ratio (OR) 6.1 (5.8–6.4). As compared to non-pregnant women, pregnant women with AC more commonly developed sepsis [OR 1.4 (1.0–1.9)], developed venous thromboembolism [OR 8.7 (4.3–17.8)] and had bowel obstruction [OR 1.3 (1.1–1.6)]. Among pregnant women with AC, surgical management was associated with a small but significant increased risk of septic shock and bile leak.

Conclusion:

AC, in the context of pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Although the literature favors early surgical intervention, pregnancies with AC appear to be more commonly managed conservatively with overall comparable outcomes to surgically managed AC. Conservative management may have a role in select pregnant women with AC.


Corresponding author: Haim A. Abenhaim, MD, MPH, FRCSC, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Pavilion H, Rooms 325, 5790 Cote-des-Neiges Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Y9, Montreal, Canada, Tel.: 514-340-8222 x25488, Fax: 514-340-7491

  1. Author’s statement

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  4. Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

  5. Source of funding: No funding was received.

References

[1] Dietrich CS, Hill CC, Hueman M. Surgical diseases presenting in pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:408–19.10.1016/j.suc.2007.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kammerer WS. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Med Clin North Am. 1979;63:1157–64.10.1016/S0025-7125(16)31633-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] Weingold AB. Appendicitis in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983;26:801–9.10.1097/00003081-198312000-00005Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:82–7.10.1007/s00464-005-0100-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Weigand K, Koninger J, Encke J, Buchler MW, Stremmel W, Gutt CN. Acute cholecystitis – early laparoskopic surgery versus antibiotic therapy and delayed elective cholecystectomy: ACDC-study. Trials. 2007;8:29.10.1186/1745-6215-8-29Search in Google Scholar

[6] Lu EJ, Curet MJ, El-Sayed YY, Kirkwood KS. Medical versus surgical management of biliary tract disease in pregnancy. Am J Surg. 2004;188:755–9.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[7] Date RS, Kaushal M, Ramesh A. A review of the management of gallstone disease and its complications in prgnancy. Am J Surg. 2008;196:599–608.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.015Search in Google Scholar

[8] Landers D, Carmona R, Crombleholme W, Lim R. Acute cholecystitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:131–3.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Printen KJ, Ott RA. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Am Surg. 1978;44:432–4.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Glasgow RE, Visser BC, Harris HW, Patti MG, Kilkpatrick SJ, Mulvihill SJ. Changing management of gallstone disease during pregnancy. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:241–6.10.1007/s004649900643Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cosenza CA, Saffari B, Jabbour N, Stain SC, Garry D, Parekh D, et al. Surgical management of biliary gallstone disease during pregnancy. Am J Surg. 1999;178:545–8.10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00217-2Search in Google Scholar

[12] Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T. Safety and risks of laparoscopy in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14:375–9.10.1097/00001703-200208000-00003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] McKellar DP, Anderson CT, Boynton CJ, Peoples JB. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:465–8.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Block P, Kelly TR. Management of gallstone pancreatitis during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;168:426–8.10.1097/00006254-199001000-00014Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ko CW. Risk factors for gallstone-related hospitalization during pregnancy and the postpartum. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2263–8.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00730.xSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Sucandy I, Tellagorry J, Kolff JW. Minimally invasive surgical management of acute cholecystitis during pregnancy: what are the recommendations? Am Surg. 2013;79:E251–2.10.1177/000313481307900703Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pearl J, Price R, Richardson W, Fanelli R, Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3479–92.10.1007/s00464-011-1927-3Search in Google Scholar

[18] Moreno-Sanz C, Pascual-Pedreño A, Picazo-Yeste JS, Seoane-Gonzalez JB. Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy: between personal experiences and scientific evidence. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:37–42.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.068Search in Google Scholar

[19] Curet MJ, Allen D, Josloff RK, Pitcher DE, Curet LB, Miscall BG, et al. Laparoscopy during pregnancy. Arch Surg. 1996;131: 546–50; discussion 50–1.10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430170092017Search in Google Scholar

[20] Brenner B, Avivi I, Lishner M. Haematological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet. 2012;379:580–7.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61348-2Search in Google Scholar

[21] Greenstein AJ, Moskowitz A, Gelijns AC, Egorova NN. Payer status and treatment paradigm for acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg. 2012;147:453–8.10.1001/archsurg.2011.1702Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Gilo NB, Amini D, Landy HJ. Appendicitis and cholecystitis in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:586–96.10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181c11d10Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Reiss R, Nudelman I, Gutman C, Deutsch AA. Changing trends in surgery for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg. 1990;14:567–70; discussion 70-1.10.1007/BF01658790Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Sharp HT. Gastrointestinal surgical conditions during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37:306–15.10.1097/00003081-199406000-00008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-03-17
Accepted: 2017-11-07
Published Online: 2018-01-25
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2017-0085/html
Scroll to top button