Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 1, 2018

Birth risks according to maternal height and weight – an analysis of the German Perinatal Survey

  • Manfred Voigt , Hans-Peter Hagenah EMAIL logo , Tanya Jackson , Mirjam Kunze , Ursula Wittwer-Backofen , Dirk Manfred Olbertz and Sebastian Straube

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the variability in the prevalences of selected birth risks in women of different heights and weights.

Methods

Data from the German Perinatal Survey of 1998–2000 were analyzed: 503,468 cases contributed to our analysis of the prevalences of selected birth risks specified according to maternal weight groups, 502,562 cases contributed to our analysis according to maternal height groups and 43,928 cases contributed to our analysis of birth risks in women with a body mass index (BMI) of 21–23 kg/m2 but different heights and weights. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.

Results

Some birth risks varied substantially by maternal height in women with a “normal” BMI of 21–23 kg/m2: the prevalence of post-term birth increased from 8.7% in women with a height of 150 cm to 13.5% in 185 cm tall women, the prevalence of preterm birth decreased from 5.9% (150 cm tall women) to 3.1% (185 cm tall women), a pathologic cardiotocography (CTG) or poor fetal heart sounds on auscultation occurred in 19.4% of the 150 cm tall women but only in 9.2% of 185 cm tall women and cephalopelvic disproportion decreased from 12.3% (150 cm tall women) to 1.2% (185 cm tall women). Analyses of women in different body height and weight groups (without restriction of BMI) likewise showed differences in the prevalences of some birth risks.

Conclusion

Birth risks may vary by height and weight in women with the same, “normal” BMI. BMI should not be the only way by which the impact of maternal height and weight is assessed with regard to perinatal outcomes such as birth risks.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Voigt M, Straube S, Olbertz D, Häuser B, Schneider KT. Beziehungen zwischen Körpergewicht, Körperhöhe, Body-Mass-Index und der Gewichtszunahme von Frauen in der Schwangerschaft. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2007;211:147–52.10.1055/s-2007-981236Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Voigt M, Rochow N, Jährig K, Straube S, Hufnagel S, Jorch G. Dependence of neonatal small and large for gestational age rates on maternal height and weight – an analysis of the German Perinatal Survey. J Perinat Med 2010;38:425–30.10.1515/jpm.2010.059Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Voigt M, Zels K, Guthmann F, Hesse V, Görlich Y, Straube S. Somatic classification of neonates based on birth weight, length, and head circumference: quantification of the effects of maternal BMI and smoking. J Perinat Med 2011;39:291–7.10.1515/jpm.2011.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Voigt M, Straube S, Zygmunt M, Krafczyk B, Schneider KT, Briese V. Obesity and pregnancy – a risk profile. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2008;212:201–5.10.1055/s-2008-1076995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Briese V, Voigt M, Wisser J, Borchardt U, Straube S. Risks of pregnancy and birth in obese primiparous women: an analysis of German perinatal statistics. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:249–53.10.1007/s00404-009-1349-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Abenhaim HA, Kinch RA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher R. Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;275:39–43.10.1007/s00404-006-0219-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Alexandra P, Vassilios B, Alexandra V, George K, Vassiliki L, Chryssa B. Population-based trends of pregnancy outcome in obese mothers: what has changed over 15 years. Obesity 2011;19:1861–5.10.1038/oby.2010.317Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Krentz H, Voigt M, Guthmann F, Hesse V, Straube S. On the variability in preterm birth rate, birth weight, and somatic classification among neonates of mothers with the same body mass index. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011;215:163–6.10.1055/s-0031-1285847Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Derraik JG, Lundgren M, Cutfield WS, Ahlsson F. Maternal height and preterm birth: a study on 192,432 Swedish women. PLoS One 2016;11:e0154304.10.1371/journal.pone.0154304Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Myklestad K, Vatten LJ, Magnussen EB, Salvesen KÅ, Romundstad PR. Do parental heights influence pregnancy length?: a population-based prospective study, HUNT 2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:33.10.1186/1471-2393-13-33Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Voigt M, Straube S, Schmidt P, Pildner von Steinburg S, Schneider KT. Vorstellung von Normwerten der Gewichtszunahme in der Schwangerschaft (20–43 vollendete Schwangerschaftswochen) unter Berücksichtigung von Körperhöhe und Körpergewicht der Frauen. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2007;211:191–203.10.1055/s-2007-981327Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-01-31
Accepted: 2018-06-15
Published Online: 2018-10-01
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2017-0038/html
Scroll to top button