Abstract
Fetal malformations are more frequent in twins than in singletons. The aim of our study was to define the influence of a malformed twin on di-chorionic pregnancy outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of di-chorionic pregnancies delivered between 2000 and 2015. Exclusion criteria were: both twins affected by fetal malformations, double intra-uterine fetal death in pregnancies without fetal malformation, selective feticide and therapeutic pregnancy termination. We compared maternal and fetal outcomes of di-chorionic pregnancies not complicated by fetal malformations with pregnancies affected by a single malformed fetus with conservative management. We included 642 di-chorionic pregnancies: 56 (case group, 8.7%) with one twin affected by a malformation (20 minor, 36 major ones), 586 (control group, 91.3%) without fetal malformation. No differences were found on maternal and not malformed co-twin outcomes when compared to pregnancies with no malformation; case vs control group presented similar rates of preeclampsia (8.9% vs. 10.8%, respectively), intrauterine growth restriction (7.1% vs. 9.4%) and composite adverse neonatal outcomes (19.6% vs. 15.1%). No case of fetal death in not malformed co-twin was reported. Expectant management could be a safe option for both mother and co-twin in case of di-chorionic twin pregnancy complicated by only one malformed fetus.
Author’s statement
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.
References
[1] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;80:1–8.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.10.1053/sper.2002.34775Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997–2000. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(5 Part 2):1159–66.10.1542/peds.111.S1.1159Search in Google Scholar
[4] Vayssière C, Benoist G, Blondel B, Deruelle P, Favre R, Gallot D, et al. French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians, twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 156:12–7.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.10.1093/humrep/15.8.1856Search in Google Scholar
[6] Luke B, Brown MB. Contemporary risks of maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age and plurality. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:283–93.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[7] Dubé J, Dodds L, Armson BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:579–83.10.1067/mob.2002.121721Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, Sepulveda W, Nicolaides KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1203–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10948.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Wright C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod. 2008;23: 1306–11.10.1093/humrep/den104Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Rossi AC, D’Addario V. Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: a systematic review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:123–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Bigelow CA, Factor SH, Moshier E, Bianco A, Eddleman KA, Stone JL. Timing of and outcomes after selective termination of anomalous fetuses in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:1320–5.10.1002/pd.4474Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Alvarado EA, Pacheco RP, Alderete FG, Luís JA, de la Cruz AA, Quintana LO. Selective termination in di-chorionic twins discordant for congenital defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;161:8–11.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.024Search in Google Scholar
[13] Evans MI, Goldberg JD, Dommergues M, Wapner RJ, Lynch L, Dock BS, et al. Efficacy of second trimester selective termination for fetal abnormalities: international collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:90–4.10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70083-4Search in Google Scholar
[14] Bryan E, Little J, Burn J. Congenital anomalies in twins. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;1:697–721.10.1016/S0950-3552(87)80012-3Search in Google Scholar
[15] Malone FD, Craigo SD, Chelmoy D, D’Alton ME. Outcome of twin gestations complicated by a single anomalous fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:1–5.10.1016/0029-7844(96)00112-3Search in Google Scholar
[16] Nassar AH, Adra AM, Gómez-Marín O, O’Sullivan MJ. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies with one structurally affected fetus: a case-control study. J Perinatol. 2000;20:82–6.10.1038/sj.jp.7200318Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Linskens IH, Elburg RM, Oepkes D, Vugt JM, Haak MC. Expectant management in twin pregnancies with discordant structural fetal anomalies. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:283–9.10.1375/twin.14.3.283Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] Gul A, Cebeci A, Aslan H, Polat I, Sozen I, Ceylan Y. Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies discordant for major fetal anomalies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005;20:244–8.10.1159/000085078Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] Sun LM, Chen XK, Wen SW, Fung KF, Yang Q, Walker MC. Perinatal outcomes of normal cotwins in twin pregnancies with one structurally anomalous fetus: a population-based retrospective study. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:51–6.10.1055/s-0028-1095180Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Yildirim G, Ekiz A, Gul A, Ceylan Y. Twin pregnancies complicated by a single malformed fetus: chorionicity, outcome and management. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2010;13:501–7.10.1375/twin.13.5.501Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Chang YL, Chao AS, Cheng PJ, Chung CL, Chueh HY, Chang SD, et al. Presence of a single fetal major anomaly in a twin pregnancy does not increase the preterm rate. Aus N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:332–6.10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00248.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Hoyert DL, Mathews TJ, Menacker F, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics. Pediatrics. 2006;117: 168–83.10.1542/peds.2005-2587Search in Google Scholar
[23] Gelehrter T, Collins FS, Ginsburg D. Principles of medical genetics. Approach to child with birth defect. 2nd ed. 1998.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Wood SL, Onge R, Connors G, Elliot PD. Evaluation of the twin peak or Lambda sign in determining chorionicity in multiple pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:6–9.10.1016/0029-7844(96)00094-4Search in Google Scholar
[25] Malone FD, D’Alton ME. Management of multiple gestations complicated by a single anomalous fetus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;17:202–7.10.1097/00001703-199706000-00014Search in Google Scholar
[26] Lust A, De Catte L, Lewi L, Deprest J, Loquet P, Devlieger R. Monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies discordant for fetal anencephaly: a systematic review of prenatal management options. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:275–9.10.1002/pd.1967Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1995;57:289–300.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.xSearch in Google Scholar
[28] Mandy GT, Weisman LE, Kim MS. Neonatal complications, outcome, and management of multiple births. Uptodate 2015. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/neonatal-complications-outcome-and-management-of-multiple-births?source=search_result&search=Neonatal%20complications,%20outcome,%20and%20management%20of%20multiple%20births.&selectedTitle=1~150.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Fernandes TR, Carvalho PR, Flosi FB, Baião AE, Junior SC. Perinatal outcome of discordant anomalous twins: a single-center experience in a developing country. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016;20:1–4.10.1017/thg.2016.42Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Vandecruys H, Avgidou K, Surerus E, Flack N, Nicolaides KH. Dilemmas in the management of twins discordant for anencephaly diagnosed at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2006;28:653–8.10.1002/uog.2836Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
