Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 21, 2016

Can prepartum thromboelastometry-derived parameters and fibrinogen levels really predict postpartum hemorrhage?

  • Lutz Kaufner EMAIL logo , Anne Henkelmann , Christian von Heymann , Aarne Feldheiser , Laura Mickley , Katja Niepraschk-von Dollen , Ulrike Grittner , Wolfgang Henrich and Christian Bamberg

Abstract

Background:

Decreased postpartum rotational thromboelastometric parameters of coagulation (ROTEM®) and fibrinogen levels have been associated with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the predictive power of prepartum ROTEM® parameters and fibrinogen levels (Fbgpre) for PPH remains unknown.

Methods:

This prospective observational pilot study included 217 healthy pregnant women. Maximum clot firmness (FIBTEM-MCF), fibrinogen levels and standard coagulation parameters were measured upon admission to the delivery room for labor and within 1 h after vaginal delivery. Blood loss was measured with a calibrated collecting drape during the third stage of labor. PPH was defined as blood loss ≥500 mL. Predictors for bleeding were identified via receiver operating characteristic analyses and bivariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results:

Women with and without PPH did not differ in median FIBTEM-MCF [23 mm (25th percentile 20 mm, 75th percentile 26 mm) vs. 23 mm (19 mm, 26 mm), respectively; P=0.710] or mean Fbgpre (4.57±0.77 g/L vs. 4.45±0.86 g/L, respectively; P=0.431). Blood loss and prepartum coagulation parameters were not correlated (FIBTEM-MCF, rs=−0.055, P=0.431; Fbgpre, rs=−0.017, P=0.810). The areas under the curves (predictive power for PPH) for FIBTEM-MCF and Fbgpre and were 0.52 (0.41–0.64, P=0.699) and 0.53 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.40–0.65, P=0.644], respectively. Neither FIBTEM-MCF nor Fbgpre was associated with PPH. However, primiparity [odds ratio (OR) 4.27, 95% CI 1.32–13.80, P=0.015) and urgent cesarean section (2.77, 1.00–7.67, P=0.050) were independent predictors of PPH.

Conclusions:

ROTEM® parameters, Fbgpre and postpartum blood loss were not associated, nor did these factors predict PPH. Sufficiently powered prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.


Corresponding author: Dr. med. Lutz Kaufner, MD, MSc, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Tel.: +0049-30-450 551002, Fax: +0049-30-450 551900
aLutz Kaufner and Anne Henkelmann: These authors contributed equally to this work.
  1. Disclosure of funding: This paper describes an investigator-initiated study. Support was received from institutional and departmental sources.

  2. Trial registration: DRKS00005624 (www.drks.de).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: C.v.H.: received a speaker’s fee from CSL Behring and TEM International. A.F.: received a speaker’s fee from NOGGO. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.

References

[1] WHO: recommendations for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Edited by Organisation WH. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/en/, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Liu XH, Jiang YM, Shi H, Yue XA, Wang YF, Yang H. Prospective, sequential, longitudinal study of coagulation changes during pregnancy in Chinese women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:240–3.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.01.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Davies JR, Fernando R, Hallworth SP. Hemostatic function in healthy pregnant and preeclamptic women: an assessment using the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) and thromboelastograph. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:416–20.10.1213/01.ane.0000253510.00213.05Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Szecsi PB, Jørgensen M, Klajnbard A, Andersen MR, Colov NP, Stender S. Haemostatic reference intervals in pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103:718–27.10.1160/TH09-10-0704Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] de Lloyd L, Bovington R, Kaye A, Collis RE, Rayment R, Sanders J, et al. Standard haemostatic tests following major obstetric haemorrhage. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:135–41.10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Levy JH, Welsby I, Goodnough LT. Fibrinogen as a therapeutic target for bleeding: a review of critical levels and replacement therapy. Transfusion. 2014;54:1389–405.10.1111/trf.12431Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Simon L, Santi TM, Sacquin P, Hamza J. Pre-anaesthetic assessment of coagulation abnormalities in obstetric patients: usefulness, timing and clinical implications. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:678–83.10.1097/00132586-199806000-00018Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gayat E, Resche-Rigon M, Morel O, Rossignol M, Mantz J, Nicolas-Robin A, et al. Predictive factors of advanced interventional procedures in a multicentre severe postpartum haemorrhage study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1816–25.10.1007/s00134-011-2315-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Cortet M, Deneux-Tharaux C, Dupont C, Colin C, Rudigoz RC, Bouvier-Colle MH, et al. Association between fibrinogen level and severity of postpartum haemorrhage: secondary analysis of a prospective trial. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:984–9.10.1097/01.SA.0000427318.75137.2aSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Charbit B, Mandelbrot L, Samain E, Baron G, Haddaoui B, Keita H, et al. The decrease of fibrinogen is an early predictor of the severity of postpartum hemorrhage. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:266–73.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02297.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Karlsson O, Jeppsson A, Thornemo M, Lafrenz H, Rådström M, Hellgren M. Fibrinogen plasma concentration before delivery is not associated with postpartum haemorrhage: a prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:99–104.10.1093/bja/aev039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Yamada T, Akaishi R, Oda Y, Nishida R, Ishikawa S, Morikawa M, et al. Antenatal fibrinogen concentrations and postpartum haemorrhage. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23:365–70.10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] de Lange NM, van Rheenen-Flach LE, Lancé MD, Mooyman L, Woiski M, van Pampus EC, et al. Peri-partum reference ranges for ROTEM(R) thromboelastometry. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112: 852–9.10.1093/bja/aet480Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Mallaiah S, Barclay P, Harrod I, Chevannes C, Bhalla A. Introduction of an algorithm for ROTEM-guided fibrinogen concentrate administration in major obstetric haemorrhage. Anaesthesia. 2014;70:166–75.10.1111/anae.12859Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Solomon C, Collins RE, Collins PW. Haemostatic monitoring during postpartum haemorrhage and implications for management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:851–63.10.1093/bja/aes361Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Theusinger OM, Schröder CM, Eismon J, Emmert MY, Seifert B, Spahn DR, et al. The influence of laboratory coagulation tests and clotting factor levels on Rotation Thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) during major surgery with hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:314–21.10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829569acSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Huissoud C, Carrabin N, Audibert F, Levrat A, Massignon D, Berland M, et al. Bedside assessment of fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhage by thrombelastometry. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:1097–102.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02187.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] van der Bom JG. Rotem in postpartum hemorrhage. Blood. 2014;124:1700–1.10.1182/blood-2014-07-590349Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Collins PW, Lilley G, Bruynseels D, Laurent DB, Cannings-John R, Precious E, et al. Fibrin-based clot formation as an early and rapid biomarker for progression of postpartum hemorrhage: a prospective study. Blood. 2014;124:1727–36.10.1182/blood-2014-04-567891Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Karlsson O, Jeppsson A, Hellgren M. Major obstetric haemorrhage: monitoring with thromboelastography, laboratory analyses or both? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23:10–7.10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Bamberg C, Niepraschk-von Dollen K, Mickley L, Henkelmann A, Hinkson L, Kaufner L, et al. Evaluation of measured postpartum blood loss after vaginal delivery using a collector bag in relation to postpartum hemorrhage management strategies: a prospective observational study. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:433–9.10.1515/jpm-2015-0200Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Spies C, Kastrup M, Kerner T, Melzer-Gartzke C, Zielke H, Kox WJ. SOPs in Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Verlag, 2013.10.1055/b-002-57140Search in Google Scholar

[23] Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M. Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;57:273–9.10.1016/S0020-7292(97)00069-6Search in Google Scholar

[24] Rath W, Surbeck D, Kainer F, Grottke O, Hopp H, Kiesewetter H, et al. Diagnostik und Therapie peripartaler Blutungen. Edited by (DGGG) LdDGfrGuG, June 2008, pp. 9.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kaufner L, Weizsäcker K, Spies C, Feldheiser A, von Heymann C. Emergency caesarean section and interdisciplinary emergency concepts for the delivery room – “What to do if it is urgent?” Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2012;47:14–21.10.1055/s-0032-1301375Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Clauss A. Rapid physiological coagulation method in determination of fibrinogen. Acta Haematol. 1957;17:237–46.10.1159/000205234Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Calatzis A, Spannagl M, Vorweg M. Zielgerichtete Behandlung akuter Hämostasestörungen mit Hilfe der ROTEM (R) Analyse, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Peyvandi F, Biguzzi E, Franchi F, Bucciarelli P, Acaia B, Zaina B, et al. Elevated prepartum fibrinogen levels are not associated with a reduced risk of postpartum hemorrhage. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:1451–3.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04755.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Oudghiri M, Keita H, Kouamou E, Boutonnet M, Orsini M, Desconclois C, et al. Reference values for rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) parameters following non-haemorrhagic deliveries. Correlations with standard haemostasis parameters. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106:176–8.10.1160/TH11-02-0058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Lang T, Bauters A, Braun SL, Pötzsch B, von Pape KW, Kolde HJ, et al. Multi-centre investigation on reference ranges for ROTEM thromboelastometry. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005;16: 301–10.10.1097/01.mbc.0000169225.31173.19Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Huissoud C, Carrabin N, Benchaib M, Fontaine O, Levrat A, Massignon D, et al. Coagulation assessment by rotation thrombelastometry in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:755–61.10.1160/TH08-06-0386Search in Google Scholar

[32] Armstrong S, Fernando R, Ashpole K, Simons R, Columb M. Assessment of coagulation in the obstetric population using ROTEM® thromboelastometry. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:293–8.10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.05.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

  1. The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.


Article note:

Presented in poster format at EUROANAESTHESIA 2014, Stockholm, Sweden, May 31-June 3, 2014.


Received: 2016-1-13
Accepted: 2016-6-19
Published Online: 2016-7-21
Published in Print: 2017-5-24

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0009/html
Scroll to top button