Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter August 18, 2023

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in pediatric endocrinology

  • Jeremy Winkelman EMAIL logo , Diep Nguyen , Eric vanSonnenberg , Alison Kirk and Steven Lieberman

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is integrating itself throughout the medical community. AI’s ability to analyze complex patterns and interpret large amounts of data will have considerable impact on all areas of medicine, including pediatric endocrinology. In this paper, we review and update the current studies of AI in pediatric endocrinology. Specific topics that are addressed include: diabetes management, bone growth, metabolism, obesity, and puberty. Becoming knowledgeable and comfortable with AI will assist pediatric endocrinologists, the goal of the paper.

Introduction

Medical knowledge is expanding rapidly, estimated to double every 73 days [1, 2]. Today’s physicians are becoming increasingly reliant on digital tools to better assist them in medical decisions during this onslaught of information [3]. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most powerful assets for information processing that currently exists. AI is well-suited to analyze vast amounts of information efficiently, and has the potential to positively influence many medical specialties due to its complex pattern analysis abilities. The applications of AI already have been applied, and are continuing, to revolutionize various medical fields, such as genetics [4], oncology [5], imaging [6], and pharmacokinetics [7]. This paper serves to summarize the main advancements of AI in pediatric endocrinology. Furthermore, we provide predictions on what future challenges AI might address in the field.

Pediatric endocrinology, as a subspecialty of pediatrics, encompasses a wide range of endocrine abnormalities. The diseases that pediatric endocrinologists frequently encounter consist of: growth problems; early or delayed puberty; thyroid, pituitary, adrenal gland, pancreatic, ovarian, and testicular dysfunction; diabetes; hypoglycemia; obesity; and vitamin D problems [8]. AI can enhance the ability to detect pediatric endocrinologic disease early and accurately [9]. This can be extremely valuable for timely interventions and improved outcomes in children. AI also can be used to effectively automate preventive screening tools to detect diseases. Becoming knowledgeable and comfortable with AI can assist pediatric endocrinologists, the true goal of this paper.

We will now address these individual areas in-depth with respect to AI.

Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing β cells in the pancreas by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and macrophages that infiltrate the islets [10]. A large portion of the patients a pediatric endocrinologist sees are those with type 1 diabetes. From 2001 to 2017, the prevalence of type 1 diabetes in children in the United States increased from 1.48 per 1,000 children to 2.15 per 1,000, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children in the US also increased from 0.34 per 1,000 children to 0.67 per 1,000 [11]. Managing the insulin regimen is a major aspect of these patients’ health. In a study using an AI decision support system, recommended insulin dose adjustments were similar between expert pediatric endocrinologists and AI [12]. This highlights the potential incorporation of AI as a decision support tool to assist physicians with insulin dose adjustments and titrations.

Diabetic retinopathy is a well-known complication of diabetes and a major cause of vision loss worldwide. The American Diabetes Association recommends screening for diabetic retinopathy in children 11 years or older with a dilated ophthalmologic examination or retinal photography [13]; unfortunately this is not always feasible or followed. Detecting early diabetic retinopathy is an area in which AI is making strides. Utilizing an AI system for diabetic eye exams may become a reality to aid management in diabetic children. In one study involving children with diabetes at a multidisciplinary pediatric diabetes center, an AI system was used to detect the presence of diabetic retinopathy with a sensitivity of 85.7 % and a specificity of 79.3 %. The use of an AI system also was found to improve adherence to screening guidelines in this setting [14]. Another adult AI system is performing at even higher levels compared to the childhood AI system; AI predicted diabetic retinopathy in a primary care population with a sensitivity of 87.2 % and a specificity of 90.7 % [15]. Although this evidence was used in adult populations, it could potentially be applicable to children in the future.

Machine learning systems have been developed to predict the diagnosis of diabetes in adults through electronic health groups. One group used data by a machine learning algorithm to determine who had type 2 diabetes, based off data points listed in the electronic health record out of a population of over 23,000 people. Some of the data points included patient demographics, patient communicated symptoms, laboratory results, medications, and inpatient and outpatient diagnosis records. This system had a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 [16], a testament to the system’s accuracy. Predictive models show the feasibility of identifying adults who have a high probability to develop undiagnosed diabetes. Studies such as these are promising, and eventually may be applied to predict children who will develop diabetes.

Another serious complication of diabetes is chronic kidney disease, defined as elevated urinary albumin excretion or impaired renal function [17], which approximately one-third of patients with type 1 diabetes will develop [18]. One study in adults used AI to predict diabetic kidney disease progression with 71 % accuracy [19], which is another promising example of a potential application for children in pediatric endocrinology in the future. To date, there are no studies that have looked at the use of Al for prediction of diabetic-associated kidney disease in children with diabetes, although AI’s utility may be anticipated.

There are currently 3 FDA approved AI-based devices related to diabetes management [20]. Two are designed to manage blood glucose monitoring with continuous glucose monitoring predictive alerts [21]. The third interprets ophthalmologic results to detect early diabetic retinopathy [22].

Short stature and bone growth

Monitoring that recognizes abnormalities in growth can indicate serious diseases accurately [23]. Bone age is one of many parameters pediatricians use to determine potential causes of growth abnormality, although assessing bone maturation does not necessarily translate into improved diagnostic accuracy. Deep learning neural networks have been shown to estimate pediatric skeletal maturity from ages 1.5–18.2 years with similar accuracy to expert radiologists [24]. Additionally, screening of growth disorders using algorithms integrated into a Finland EHR system resulted in higher and earlier rates of detection and referrals to specialists, compared to standardized growth monitoring. Some of these diagnoses include celiac disease and Turner’s syndrome [25].

A system called the fully automated deep learning system for bone age assessment was created in 2017 by a group of researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital. This convoluted neural network was able to assess bone age using female radiographs within 1 year with 90.39 % accuracy; male radiographs could be predicted accurately at 94.18 % to within 1 year of actual bone age [26]. The Radiology Society of North America in 2017 created a competition to best estimate bone age assessment using machine learning. One AI company achieved accuracy of hand bone age within an average of 4.3 months [27].

Another fully automated AI system studied pediatric Chinese patients with abnormal growth and development to predict bone age. The accuracy of this automated AI system within 1 year was 84.60 %, compared to the reference standard, with the highest percentage of 89.45 % in the 12- to 18-year group [28].

An area in which AI and machine learning shine, is in interpreting medical images and helping physicians make diagnoses. AI can assist in analyzing heterogeneous variables such as facial structure. One machine learning algorithm showed better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared to physicians for diagnosing acromegaly by using early detection of facial changes imaging [29].

Thyroid nodules

The incidence of thyroid cancer in the US adolescence is increasing, with an annual percentage change of 3.44 for males, and 3.81 for females [30]. Therefore, a reliable method to differentiate benign from cancerous nodules accurately would be valuable clinically. AI is being used to help establish the diagnosis and management of pediatric thyroid diseases. One deep learning algorithm was used to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules on ultrasound in children and young adults. The algorithm had a sensitivity of 87.5 %, which was higher compared to the average sensitivity of 58.3 % from radiologists, although lower for specificity (36.1 % compared to average of 79.9 %) [31]. It is suggested that this improvement in diagnostic performance could help reduce unnecessary fine needle biopsies for thyroid nodules [32].

Metabolism and obesity

Another focus of pediatric endocrinology is childhood obesity and metabolism. According to the CDC, “For children and adolescents aged 2–19 years in 2017–2020, the prevalence of obesity was 19.7 % and affected about 14.7 million children and adolescents.” [33].

Using AI to analyze clinical signs and symptoms to help predict childhood obesity can lead to earlier interventions and lifestyle modifications. Current non-AI tools to estimate future obesity are imprecise, and utilize variables such as family history, eating habits, exercise levels, and overall activity levels. AI has numerous opportunities to improve patient outcomes in this area. Using machine learning techniques, one group was able to predict childhood obesity in children less than 2 years old with an accuracy of 85 % and a sensitivity of 89 %. They analyzed nine years of clinical information from 7,519 patients from four hospitals. The machine learning algorithm included biometrics, including child weight, height, race, and vital signs, as well as other variables including insurance status and use of a walker. They determined the most important factor for predicting obesity was overweight before 24 months [34].

Resting energy expenditure represents the expended energy while patients lay quietly with little movement. It is the largest component of daily caloric expenditure, and the gold standard of measuring it, an indirect calorimetry, often is not available in the clinical setting. One group developed a neural network, using weight, height, and sex as clinical inputs, that was able to measure the resting energy expenditure in obese patients to a better degree than established equations. This is clinically significant because an accurate assessment of energy needs is necessary to determine what appropriate dietary changes can be recommended; this can guide proper nutritional prescription in critically ill children [35, 36]. Another artificial neural network estimated resting energy expenditure in pediatric ICU patients using data input. The data includes nutritional status, vital signs, biochemical values, and VC02, and reached an accuracy of 89.6 %, greater than commonly used predictive equations [36].

Metabolic syndrome is a group of various disorders that ultimately can lead to heart disease, stroke, or type 2 diabetes. Clinical data also have been able to help predict Metabolic syndrome using an artificial neural network. It is difficult to estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in children because many different criteria have been used in its various definitions. Different publications have described prevalence numbers ranging from 0.2 to 38.9 %. The incidence of metabolic syndrome is a range, depending on criteria used, although it is certain that the overall incidence has increased over time [37]. One machine learning algorithm used data input that included demographic information, home address, vital signs, medications, maternal vital signs, and maternal laboratory results, before, during, and post-pregnancy. It was able to predict obesity at year 5 from children less than 2 years old, with an AUC of 81.7 % for girls and 76.1 % for boys [38]. Machine learning algorithms also have been deployed to predict the success of therapies for decreasing childhood obesity and related outcomes. One study aimed to predict the success of a 6-month weight loss therapy for a cohort of 20 adolescents from Switzerland. The machine learning algorithm used factors including weight, age, BMI, height, and heartrate during a run test; it was able to predict success of therapy with an 85 % accuracy, performing better than domain expert predictions [39].

Puberty

Central precocious puberty, or the early activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, is defined by, “the early development of secondary sex characteristics, acceleration of linear growth, advanced bone age, and a pubertal response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) test” [40]. Pediatric endocrinologists diagnose and treat patients with pediatric precocious puberty and other areas of puberty dysfunction.

A machine-learning based diagnostic model was used to determine if female children with an already established diagnosis of precocious puberty had a central cause. Of the 614 patients with this already established diagnosis, 85 % had central precocious puberty. The machine learning tool used inputs including age, BMI, secondary sex characteristics, bone age x-ray results, and laboratory tests. This machine learning model was able to predict central precocious puberty with a positive predictive value of 0.987, area under the curve of 0.972, and a specificity of 0.893 [41]. The benefits of this technology would be to reduce the number of blood samplings, as well as to provide results more efficiently than the standard GnRH stimulation test. A different machine learning diagnostic model, using laboratory data on 1,757 girls, was able to predict central precocious puberty with sensitivity ranging from 77.91 to 77.94 %, and specificity ranging from 84.32 to 87.66 %. They determined that serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and insulin-like growth factor levels were the most important predictive input factors [42].

Machine learning algorithms have been applied to the detection of subtle dysmorphic facial features. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a common pediatric primary adrenal insufficiency condition that leads to a hormonal excess, such as from testosterone and estrogen. Although there are many distinct characteristics of CAH, differences in morphologic facial features are not a classic aspect of it. A cross-sectional study in Southern California used a machine learning algorithm to determine whether subtle dysmorphic facial changes would be enough to predict CAH. This study was able to achieve a mean AUC of 92 % for predicting CAH, from just facial images that had distinct, subtle, and morphologic changes [43].

Early timing of menarche has been linked to adverse health outcomes, including obesity, asthma, and type 2 diabetes [44]. Certain endocrine disrupting chemicals can impact when female patients begin menarche. One study used machine learning to determine if exposure to certain combinations of endocrine disrupting chemicals had an impact when menarche began; it was able to determine several interpretable combination of biomarkers. For example, lower levels of mono-(2-ethyl-5-hexyl) phthalate (MEHP), a metabolite of Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) that is a type of phthalate that often is used in plastics to increase flexibility [45], corresponded to earlier onset of menarche [46]. This information is an example of how machine learning can be used to screen efficiently for new chemicals with appreciable effects on disruptions to human endocrinologic pathways.

Limitations of AI

Although AI offers much potential to enhance pediatric endocrinology, it has limitations. Machine learning algorithms are most effectively trained on large, standardized data-sets; thus, since psychological status and changes in social factors are not standardized data-sets, they are not amenable to machine learning algorithms.

Breach of private health data used in electronic health records that could be used to train AI algorithms would be catastrophic [47]. Currently, there is no focus on training or educating endocrinologists in the use of these technologies for diagnosis or research [9].

Most importantly, AI does simulate the doctor–patient relationship. Patients want and deserve human connection when interacting within the health care system, and that is something that physicians do, but AI cannot.

Conclusions

AI’s ability to analyze complex patterns and interpret large amounts of data will have considerable impact on all areas of medicine, including pediatric endocrinology. While the influence of AI surely will expand in the future, it is already having an impact. This paper has highlighted advances AI has made in diabetes management, bone growth, metabolism, obesity, and puberty. The future is bright for AI to be a valuable adjunct for pediatric endocrinologists.


Corresponding author: Jeremy Winkelman, MS4, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, HSEB Building C523, 475 N 5th St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA, Phone: 602 827 2611, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

References

1. Ngo, B, Nguyen, DN, vanSonnenberg, E. Artificial Intelligence: has its time come for inclusion in medical school education? Maybe… Maybe not [Version 2]. MedEdPublish 2021;10:131. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2021.000131.2.Search in Google Scholar

2. Densen, P. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2011;122:48–58.Search in Google Scholar

3. Masters, K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the internet: a systematic review. Int J Med Inf 2008;77:4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.10.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Bouaziz, J, Mashiach, R, Cohen, S, Kedem, A, Baron, A, Zajicek, M, et al.. How artificial intelligence can improve our understanding of the genes associated with endometriosis: natural language processing of the PubMed database. BioMed Res Int 2018;2018:6217812. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6217812.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Boon, IS, Au Yong, TPT, Boon, CS. Assessing the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in clinical oncology: utility of machine learning in radiotherapy target volume delineation. Med (Basel) 2018;5:131. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5040131.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Narula, S, Shameer, K, Salem Omar, AM, Dudley, JT, Sengupta, PP. Machine-Learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2287–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Deshpande, D, Pasipanodya, JG, Mpagama, SG, Bendet, P, Srivastava, S, Koeuth, T, et al.. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, dosing, susceptibility breakpoints, and Artificial Intelligence in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:S293–02. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy611.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Endocrine Society. Pediatric endocrinology. Endocrine society; 2019. https://www.endocrine.org/topics/pediatric-endocrinology.Search in Google Scholar

9. Nisar, N, Dhahrabi, H. Application of artificial intelligence in pediatric endocrinology: current scenario and future perspective. MAR Pediatrics 2022;3:1–15. www.medicalandresearch.com.Search in Google Scholar

10. Foulis, AK, McGill, M, Farquharson, MA. Insulitis in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in man--macrophages, lymphocytes, and interferon-gamma containing cells. J Pathol 1991;165:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711650203.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lawrence, JM, Divers, J, Isom, S, Saydah, S, Imperatore, G, Pihoker, C, et al.. SEARCH for diabetes in youth study group. Trends in prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents in the US, 2001–2017. JAMA 2021;326:717–27. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11165.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Nimri, R, Tirosh, A, Muller, I, Shtrit, Y, Kraljevic, I, Alonso, MM, et al.. Comparison of insulin dose adjustments made by artificial intelligence-based decision support systems and by physicians in people with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections therapy. Diabetes Technol Therapeut 2022;24:564–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0566.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Chiang, JL, Kirkman, MS, Laffel, LM, Peters, AL. Type 1 diabetes sourcebook authors. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2034–54. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1140.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Wolf, RM, Liu, TYA, Thomas, C, Prichett, L, Zimmer-Galler, I, Smith, K, et al.. The SEE study: safety, efficacy, and equity of implementing autonomous artificial intelligence for diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in youth. Diabetes Care 2021;44:781–7. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1671.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Abràmoff, MD, Lavin, PT, Birch, M, Shah, N, Folk, JC. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. NPJ Digit Med 2018;1:39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Zheng, T, Xie, W, Xu, L, He, X, Zhang, Y, You, M, et al.. A machine learning-based framework to identify type 2 diabetes through electronic health records. Int J Med Inf 2017;97:120–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Dwyer, JP, Parving, HH, Hunsicker, LG, Ravid, M, Remuzzi, G, Lewis, JB. Renal dysfunction in the presence of normoalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: results from the DEMAND study. Cardiorenal Med 2012;2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333249.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Thomas, MC, Weekes, AJ, Broadley, OJ, Cooper, ME, Mathew, TH. The burden of chronic kidney disease in Australian patients with type 2 diabetes (the NEFRON study). Med J Aust 2006;185:140–4. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00499.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Makino, M, Yoshimoto, R, Ono, M, Itoko, T, Katsuki, T, Koseki, A, et al.. Artificial intelligence predicts the progression of diabetic kidney disease using big data machine learning. Sci Rep 2019;9:11862. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48263-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Benjamens, S, Dhunnoo, P, Meskó, B. The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Abraham, SB, Arunachalam, S, Zhong, A, Agrawal, P, Cohen, O, McMahon, CM. Improved real-world glycemic control with continuous glucose monitoring system predictive alerts. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021;15:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819859334.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. van der Heijden, AA, Abramoff, MD, Verbraak, F, van Hecke, MV, Liem, A, Nijpels, G. Validation of automated screening for referable diabetic retinopathy with the IDx-DR device in the Hoorn Diabetes Care System. Acta Ophthalmol 2018;96:63–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13613.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Teran, E, Chesner, J, Rapaport, R. Growth and growth hormone: an overview. Growth Horm IGF Res 2016;28:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2016.02.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Larson, DB, Chen, MC, Lungren, MP, Halabi, SS, Stence, NV, Langlotz, CP. Performance of a deep-learning neural network model in assessing skeletal maturity on pediatric hand radiographs. Radiology 2018;287:313–22. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170236.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Sankilampi, U, Saari, A, Laine, T, Miettinen, PJ, Dunkel, L. Use of electronic health records for automated screening of growth disorders in primary care. JAMA 2013;310:1071–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.218793.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Lee, H, Tajmir, S, Lee, J, Zissen, M, Yeshiwas, BA, Alkasab, TK, et al.. Fully automated deep learning system for bone age assessment. J Digit Imag 2017;30:427–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9955-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Martin, DD, Calder, AD, Ranke, MB, Binder, G, Thodberg, HH. Accuracy and self-validation of automated bone age determination. Sci Rep 2022;12:6388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10292-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Wang, F, Gu, X, Chen, S, Liu, Y, Shen, Q, Pan, H, et al.. Artificial intelligence system can achieve comparable results to experts for bone age assessment of Chinese children with abnormal growth and development. PeerJ 2020;8:e8854. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8854.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Kong, X, Gong, S, Su, L, Howard, N, Kong, Y. Automatic detection of acromegaly from facial photographs using machine learning methods. EBioMedicine 2018;27:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Vergamini, LB, Frazier, AL, Abrantes, FL, Ribeiro, KB, Rodriguez-Galindo, C. Increase in the incidence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in children, adolescents, and young adults: a population-based study. J Pediatr 2014;164:1481–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.059.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Yang, J, Page, LC, Wagner, L, Wildman-Tobriner, B, Bisset, L, Frush, D, et al.. Thyroid nodules on ultrasound in children and young adults: comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists’ impressions, ACR TI-RADS, and a deep learning algorithm. Am J Roentgenol 2023;220:408–17. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.22.28231.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Peng, S, Liu, Y, Lv, W, Liu, L, Zhou, Q, Yang, H, et al.. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model to assist thyroid nodule diagnosis and management: a multicentre diagnostic study. Lancet Digit Health 2021;3:e250–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00041-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Fryar, CD, Carroll, MD, Afful, J. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years: United States, 1963–1965 through 2017–2018; 2020. NCHS Health E-Stats https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity-child-17-18/overweight-obesity-child-H.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

34. Dugan, TM, Mukhopadhyay, S, Carroll, A, Downs, S. Machine learning techniques for prediction of early childhood obesity. Appl Clin Inf 2015;6:506–20. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2015-03-RA-0036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Disse, E, Ledoux, S, Bétry, C, Caussy, C, Maitrepierre, C, Coupaye, M, et al.. An artificial neural network to predict resting energy expenditure in obesity. Clin Nutr 2018;37:1661–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.07.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Spolidoro, GCI, D’Oria, V, De Cosmi, V, Milani, GP, Mazzocchi, A, Akhondi-Asl, A, et al.. Artificial neural network algorithms to predict resting energy expenditure in critically ill children. Nutrients 2021;13:3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113797.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Al-Hamad, D, Raman, V. Metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Transl Pediatr 2017;6:397–407. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2017.10.02.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. Colmenarejo, G. Machine learning models to predict childhood and adolescent obesity: a review. Nutrients 2020;12:2466. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082466.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Öksüz, N, Shcherbatyi, I, Kowatsch, T, Maass, W. A data-analytical system to predict therapy success for obese children. In: Proceedings of the thirty ninth international conference on information systems. San Francisco, CA, USA; 2018:1–16 pp.Search in Google Scholar

40. Bräuner, EV, Busch, AS, Eckert-Lind, C, Koch, T, Hickey, M, Juul, A. Trends in the incidence of central precocious puberty and normal variant puberty among children in Denmark, 1998 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2015665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15665.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Huynh, QTV, Le, NQK, Huang, SY, Ho, BT, Vu, TH, Pham, HTM, et al.. Development and validation of clinical diagnostic model for girls with central precocious puberty: machine-learning approaches. PLoS One 2022;17:e0261965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261965.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Pan, L, Liu, G, Mao, X, Li, H, Zhang, J, Liang, H, et al.. Development of prediction models using machine learning algorithms for girls with suspected central precocious puberty: retrospective study. JMIR Med Inform 2019;7:e11728. https://doi.org/10.2196/11728.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. AbdAlmageed, W, Mirzaalian, H, Guo, X, Randolph, LM, Tanawattanacharoen, VK, Geffner, ME, et al.. Assessment of facial morphologic features in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia using deep learning. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2022199. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22199.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Charalampopoulos, D, McLoughlin, A, Elks, CE, Ong, KK. Age at menarche and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2014;180:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Rowdhwal, SSS, Chen, J. Toxic effects of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate: an overview. BioMed Res Int 2018;2018:1750368. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1750368.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Oskar, S, Wolff, MS, Teitelbaum, SL, Stingone, JA. Identifying environmental exposure profiles associated with timing of menarche: a two-step machine learning approach to examine multiple environmental exposures. Environ Res 2021;195:110524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110524.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Khan, B, Fatima, H, Qureshi, A, Kumar, S, Hanan, A, Hussain, J, et al.. Drawbacks of artificial intelligence and their potential solutions in the healthcare sector. Biomed Mater Devices 2023:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-023-00063-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2023-06-18
Accepted: 2023-08-03
Published Online: 2023-08-18
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 10.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem-2023-0287/html
Scroll to top button