Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Miller M, Stolfi A, Ayoub D. Findings of metabolic bone disease in infants with unexplained fractures in contested child abuse investigations: a case series of 75 infants. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2019;32:1103–20.10.1515/jpem-2019-0093Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Flaherty E, Perez-Rossello J, Levine M, Hennrikus W, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, et al. Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse. Pediatrics 2014;133:e477–89.10.1542/peds.2013-3793Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Christian CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics 2015;136:583.Search in Google Scholar
4. Brown SD, Serveas S, Hayes LL, Society for Pediatric Radiology Child Abuse C. SPR child abuse committee response regarding classic metaphyseal lesion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:W232.10.2214/AJR.14.12670Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Armstrong D. An anti-vaxxer’s new crusade. The New Yorker Magazine: The New Yorker; Nov 27, 2018. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/an-anti-vaxxers-new-crusade. Last accessed 11/20/19.Search in Google Scholar
6. Armstrong D. Doctors defending convicted child abuser “Exceed the Limits of Credulity,” Judge Rules. Propublica, Dec 18, 2018. https://www.propublica.org/article/doctors-defending-convicted-child-abuser-exceed-the-limits-of-credulity-judge-rules. Last accessed 11/20/19.Search in Google Scholar
7. Shur N, Hinds T, Shalaby-Rana E, Tinkle B, Frasier L, et al. Invited commentary: his life was lost but his heart still beats: in honor of children harmed by child abuse. Am J Med Genet A 2019;179:2329–32.10.1002/ajmg.a.61348Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Strouse PJ. Child abuse: we have problems. Pediatr Radiol 2016;46:587–90.10.1007/s00247-016-3551-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Paul S, Narang S. Expert witness participation in civil and criminal proceedings. Committee on medical liability and risk management. Pediatrics 2017;139:e20163862.10.1542/peds.2016-3862Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Lindberg DM, Dubowitz H, Alexander RC, Reece RM. The “New Science” of abusive head trauma. Int J Child Maltreat Res Policy Pract 2019;1:1.10.1007/s42448-019-00021-wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Servaes S, Brown SD, Choudhary AK, Christian CW, Done SL, et al. The etiology and significance of fractures in infants and young children: a critical multidisciplinary review. Pediatr Radiol 2016;46:591–600.10.1007/s00247-016-3546-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Choudhary AK, Servaes S, Slovis TL, Palusci VJ, Hedlund GL, et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:1048–65.10.1007/s00247-018-4149-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
