Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 9, 2020

Utility of MR proton density fat fraction and its correlation with ultrasonography and biochemical markers in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in overweight adolescents

  • Arjunlokesh Netaji , Vandana Jain , Arun Kumar Gupta , Udit Kumar and Manisha Jana EMAIL logo

Abstract

Background

Clinical or biochemical markers that have good correlation with magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction (MR PDFF) can be used as simple tools for the screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and in determining the degree of fatty infiltration of the liver. The objective of this study was to determine the degree of relationship between MR PDFF and ultrasonography (USG) grades of fatty liver, and clinical and biochemical parameters of adolescents and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of USG for diagnosis of NAFLD.

Methods

This prospective study included 34 overweight adolescents (mean age, 12.1 ± 1.5 years; range, 10–15.1 years; 10 girls and 24 boys) who underwent both USG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Correlation analysis was performed between MR fat fraction and USG grades of fatty liver, and clinical and biochemical parameters of fatty liver disease.

Results

MR fat fraction had a moderate positive correlation with serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) (ρ = 0.634, p < 0.001, ρ = 0.516, p = 0.002, respectively) and had a negligible or weak correlation with body mass index (BMI), BMI standard deviation score (SDS), waist circumference (WC), fasting insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol levels. The sensitivity and specificity of USG in the diagnosis of NAFLD were 81% (95% confidence interval 54%–95%) and 50% (27%–73%), respectively. The MR fat fraction had a moderate positive correlation with ultrasound grades of fatty liver (ρ = 0.487, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Serum ALT and AST are potential biochemical markers to assess the degree of hepatic steatosis in NAFLD, which needs validation in further studies. USG can be used as a screening tool for NAFLD, but the diagnosis should be confirmed by estimating the MR fat fraction.


Corresponding author: Dr. Manisha Jana, MD, FRCR, Additional Professor, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India, Mobile number: +91-9013590837

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was funded by Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi (Ref. No. 5/4/3-1/TF/2012/NCD-II, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001411).

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, et al. Prevalence of Fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2006;118:1388–93.10.1542/peds.2006-1212Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Vajro P, Lenta S, Socha P, Dhawan A, McKiernan P, et al. Diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: position paper of the ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;54:700–13.10.1097/MPG.0b013e318252a13fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001;344:495–500.10.1056/NEJM200102153440706Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Penke M, Kiess W, Giorgis T. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2016;29:1329–30.10.1515/jpem-2016-0415Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Bydder M, Yokoo T, Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Chavez AD, et al. Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:347–59.10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Hussain HK, Chenevert TL, Londy FJ, Gulani V, Swanson SD, et al. Hepatic fat fraction: MR imaging for quantitative measurement and display–early experience. Radiology 2005;237:1048–55.10.1148/radiol.2373041639Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Khadilkar VV, Khadilkar AV, Choudhury P, Agarwal KN, Ugra D, et al. IAP Growth Monitoring Guidelines for Children from Birth to 18 Years. Indian Pediatr 2007;44:11.Search in Google Scholar

8. WHO STEPS surveillance manual: the WHO STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2005. http://www1.paho.org/hq/ dmdocuments/2009/STEPSmanual.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Agarwal KN, Saxena A, Bansal AK, Agarwal DK. Physical growth assessment in adolescence. Indian Pediatr 2001;38:1217–35.Search in Google Scholar

10. Khadilkar A, Ekbote V, Chiplonkar S, Khadilkar V, Kajale N, et al. Waist circumference percentiles in 2–18 year old Indian children. J Pediatr 2014;164:1358–62.e2.10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499Search in Google Scholar

12. Lee SS. Radiologic evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:7392.10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7392Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018;126:1763–8.10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Middleton JP, Wiener RC, Barnes BH, Gurka MJ, DeBoer MD. Clinical features of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a need for increased awareness and a consensus for screening. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2014;53:1318–25.10.1177/0009922813520072Search in Google Scholar

15. Marchesini G, Babini M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome. Minerva Cardioangiol 2006;54:229–39.10.1097/01.mol.0000174153.53683.f2Search in Google Scholar

16. Jain V, Jana M, Upadhyay B, Ahmad N, Jain O, et al. Prevalence, clinical & biochemical correlates of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in overweight adolescents. Indian J Med Res 2018;148:291–301.10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1966_16Search in Google Scholar

17. d’Assignies G, Ruel M, Khiat A, Lepanto L, Chagnon M, et al. Noninvasive quantitation of human liver steatosis using magnetic resonance and bioassay methods. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2033–40.10.1007/s00330-009-1351-4Search in Google Scholar

18. Cali AM, De Oliveira AM, Kim H, Chen S, Reyes-Mugica M, et al. Glucose dysregulation and hepatic steatosis in obese adolescents: is there a link? Hepatol Baltim Md 2009;49:1896–903.10.1002/hep.22858Search in Google Scholar

19. Lee MJ, Bagci P, Kong J, Vos MB, Sharma P, et al. Liver steatosis assessment: correlations among pathology, radiology, clinical data and automated image analysis software. Pathol Res Pract 2013;209:371–9.10.1016/j.prp.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar

20. Mouzaki M, Trout AT, Arce-Clachar AC, Bramlage K, Kuhnell P, et al. Assessment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression in children using magnetic resonance imaging. J Pediatr 2018;201:86–92.10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.024Search in Google Scholar

21. Gupta R, Bhangoo A, Matthews NA, Anhalt H, Matta Y, et al. The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome in obese children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2011;24:907–11.10.1515/JPEM.2011.282Search in Google Scholar

22. Joseph AE, Saverymuttu SH, al-Sam S, Cook MG, Maxwell JD. Comparison of liver histology with ultrasonography in assessing diffuse parenchymal liver disease. Clin Radiol 1991;43:26–31.10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80350-2Search in Google Scholar

23. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim M-Y, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol 2010;52:579–85.10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. van Werven JR, Marsman HA, Nederveen AJ, Smits NJ, ten Kate FJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2010;256:159–68.10.1148/radiol.10091790Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Raptis DA, Fischer MA, Graf R, Nanz D, Weber A, et al. MRI: the new reference standard in quantifying hepatic steatosis? Gut 2012;61:117–27.10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300155Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Urdzik J, Bjerner T, Wanders A, Weis J, Duraj F, et al. The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the assessment of steatohepatitis in patients with colorectal liver metastasis. J Hepatol 2012;56:640–6.10.1016/j.jhep.2011.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, et al. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2005;128: 1898–906.10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-10-05
Accepted: 2020-01-20
Published Online: 2020-03-09
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem-2019-0463/html
Scroll to top button