Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 25, 2015

Assessment of the impacts of traditional Persian medical schemes and recommendations on functional chronic constipation compared to a classic medicine lactulose, a randomized clinical trial

  • Seyed Morteza Emami Alorizi , Mohammad Reza Fattahi , Seyed Ahmad Saghebi EMAIL logo , Alireza Salehi , Hossein Rezaeizadeh , Majid Nimrouzi and Mohammad M. Zarshenas EMAIL logo

Abstract

Background: To manage chronic constipation, numerous lifestyle modification schemes and recommendations as well as applications of natural medicaments have been mentioned in manuscripts of traditional Persian medicine (TPM). This study was aimed to compare the impacts of some of those recommendations with lactulose, on functional chronic constipation.

Methods: Via a blocked randomization, 100 patients were enrolled. Schemes and recommendations from TPM as intervention group were evaluated versus lactulose as control by weekly follow-ups with standard questionnaire for 3 months. Stool frequency, hard stool, painful defecation, incomplete evacuation sensation, anorectal obstruction sensation and manual maneuvers were considered as outcome measures.

Results: Eighty-six patients (42 in schemes and 44 in lactulose groups) completed the study. Median weekly stool frequency in 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment was 1.76±1.79, 2.88±0.89, 2.95±1.05 and 2.93±1.11 in the schemes and 2.41±1.67, 2.57±0.90, 2.84±0.91 and 2.77±1.00 in lactulose groups, respectively (p=0.10, 0.11, 0.60, 0.51). Thirty-two (76.2%) patients in schemes and 24 (54.5%) patients in lactulose groups were treated at the end of the protocol as they did not meet the Rome III criteria for constipation (p=0.04). In schemes group, patients reported no undesirable effects, whereas seven (15.9%) in lactulose group reported flatulence (p=0.02).

Conclusions: Studied schemes were as effective as lactulose, a gold standard to manage constipation. Results demonstrated that TPM schemes and recommendations, as lifestyle modification, for at least 3 months can be introduced as cheap, available and accessible approaches for the management of constipation.

Acknowledgments

This paper was derived from Seyed Morteza Emami Alorizi PhD thesis at Mashhad University of Medical Science. The work was supported by Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran. It is also their pleasure to tremendously thank Dr Peyman Jafari and Dr Seyed Ali Mozafarpur for his invaluable help and guidance.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. NimrouziM, SadeghpourO, ImaniehMH, Shams-ArdekaniM, ZarshenasMM, SalehiA, et al. Remedies for children constipation in medieval Persia. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med2014;19:13743.10.1177/2156587214524579Search in Google Scholar

2. MugieSM, BenningaMA, Di LorenzoC. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol2011;25:318.10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010Search in Google Scholar

3. IrajiN, KeshteliAH, SadeghpourS, DaneshpajouhnejadP, FazelM, AdibiP. Constipation in Iran: SEPAHAN systematic review no. 5. Int J Prev Med2012;3(Suppl 1):S3441.Search in Google Scholar

4. CamilleriM, Murray JA. Diarrhea and Constipation. In: LongoDL, FauciAS, KasperDL, HauserSL, JamesonJL, LoscalzoJ, editors. Harrison’s Textbook of Internal Medicine. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Education, 2011:544–567.Search in Google Scholar

5. PratherCM, Ortiz-CamachoCP. Evaluation and treatment of constipation and fecal impaction in adults. Mayo Clin Proc1998; 73:8816. quiz 7.10.4065/73.9.881Search in Google Scholar

6. CookIJ, TalleyNJ, BenningaMA, RaoSS, ScottSM. Chronic constipation: overview and challenges. Neurogastroenterol Motil2009;21:18.10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01399.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. ChinK. Obstetrics and fecal incontinence. Clin Colon Rectal Surg2014;27:110-12.10.1055/s-0034-1383903Search in Google Scholar

8. FordAC, MoayyediP, LacyBE, LemboAJ, SaitoYA, SchillerLR, et al. American College of Gastroenterology Monograph on the management of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol2014;109(Suppl 1):S226. Quiz S7.10.1038/ajg.2014.187Search in Google Scholar

9. EmmanuelA, TackJ, QuigleyE, TalleyN. Pharmacological management of constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil2009;21(S2):4154.10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01403.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. RomeroY, EvansJM, FlemingKC, PhillipsSF. Constipation and fecal incontinence in the elderly population. Mayo Clin Proc1996;71:8192.10.4065/71.1.81Search in Google Scholar

11. NimrouziM, ZarshenasMM. Functional constipation in children: non-pharmacological approach. J Integr Med2015;13:6971.10.1016/S2095-4964(15)60152-2Search in Google Scholar

12. RezaeizadehH, AlizadehM, NaseriM, ArdakaniMS. The traditional Iranian medicine point of view on health and disease. Iran J Public Health2009;38(Suppl. 1):16972.Search in Google Scholar

13. ZarshenasMM, PetramfarP, FiroozabadiA, MoeinMR, MohagheghzadehA. Types of headache and those remedies in traditional Persian medicine. Pharmacogn Rev2013;7:1726.10.4103/0973-7847.112835Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. ZargaranA, ZarshenasMM, MehdizadehA, MohagheghzadehA. Management of tremor in medieval Persia. J Hist Neurosci2013;22:5361.10.1080/0964704X.2012.670475Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. PassmoreAP, Wilson-DaviesK, StokerC, ScottME. Chronic constipation in long stay elderly patients: a comparison of lactulose and a senna-fibre combination. BMJ1993;307(6907):76971.10.1136/bmj.307.6907.769Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. AttarA, LemannM, FergusonA, HalphenM, BoutronMC, FlourieB, et al. Comparison of a low dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution with lactulose for treatment of chronic constipation. Gut1999;44:22630.10.1136/gut.44.2.226Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. JohansonJF, KralsteinJ. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2007;25:599608.10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03238.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

18. RamkumarD, RaoSSC. Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapies for chronic constipation: systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol2005;100:93671.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40925.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

19. SalminenS, LactuloseSE. Lactic acid bacteria, intestinal microecology and mucosal protection. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl1997;222:458.10.1080/00365521.1997.11720717Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. FlorentC, FlourieB, LeblondA, RautureauM, BernierJJ, RambaudJC. Influence of chronic lactulose ingestion on the colonic metabolism of lactulose in man (an in vivo study). J Clin Invest1985;75:60813.10.1172/JCI111738Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. SandersJF. Lactulose syrup assessed in a double-blind study of elderly constipated patients. J Am Geriatr Soc1978;26:2369.10.1111/j.1532-5415.1978.tb01967.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. VoskuijlW, de LorijnF, VerwijsW, HogemanP, HeijmansJ, MäkelW, et al. PEG 3350 (Transipeg) versus lactulose in the treatment of childhood functional constipation: a double blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial. Gut2004;53:15904.10.1136/gut.2004.043620Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. DupontC, LeluyerB, MaamriN, MoraliA, JoyeJ-P, FioriniJ-M, et al. Double-blind randomized evaluation of clinical and biological tolerance of polyethylene glycol 4000 versus lactulose in constipated children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr2005;41:62533.10.1097/01.mpg.0000181188.01887.78Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. AttaluriA, DonahoeR, ValestinJ, BrownK, RaoSSC. Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs. psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2011;33:8228.10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04594.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. BrandtLJ, PratherCM, QuigleyEM, SchillerLR, SchoenfeldP, TalleyNJ. Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol2005;100(Suppl 1):S521.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50613_2.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

26. BharuchaA. Treatment of severe and intractable constipation. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol2004;7:2918.10.1007/s11938-004-0015-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. PreeceJ. Introducing abdominal massage in palliative care for the relief of constipation. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery2002;8:1015.10.1054/ctnm.2002.0610Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. CherniackEP. Use of complementary and alternative medicine to treat constipation in the elderly. Geriatr Gerontol Int2013;13:5338.10.1111/ggi.12023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-2-26
Accepted: 2015-7-3
Published Online: 2015-7-25
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2015-0013/html
Scroll to top button