Abstract
In the context of current approaches to anticipation in native and non-native sentence processing, this paper investigates whether late second-language (L2) learners integrate morphosyntax, i.e. case marking, and verb semantics to generate anticipations in L2 sentence comprehension. In a visual-world eye-tracking experiment with 45 L1 English L2 learners of German and 12 German natives, German natives are found to integrate morphosyntactic and lexical-semantic information in anticipatory processing, while L2 learners only rely on lexical-semantic information for prediction. Moreover, there is no indication that increasing proficiency leads to the involvement of morphosyntax in predictive L2 processing. We discuss reasons for the lower sensitivity to morphosyntax in anticipatory L2 sentence processing.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers, Carrie N. Jackson and the Editor, Leah Roberts, for helpful comments on this manuscript. All remaining errors are my responsibility.
References
Allopenna, Paul. D., James D. Magnuson & Micheal K. Tanenhaus 1998. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38(4). 419–439.10.1006/jmla.1997.2558Search in Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerry T. M. & Yuki Kamide. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73(3). 247–264.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1Search in Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerry T. M. & Jelena Mirkovic. 2009. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science 33(4). 583–609.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.xSearch in Google Scholar
Boland, Julie E. 2005. Visual arguments. Cognition 95(3). 237–274.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27. 3–42.10.1017/S0142716406060024Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. The common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dahan, Delphine, David Swingley, Michael K. Tanenhaus & James S. Magnuson. 2000. Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory and Language 42(4). 465–480.10.1006/jmla.1999.2688Search in Google Scholar
Dussias, Paola. E. & Tracy R. Cramer Scaltz. 2008. Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologia 128. 501–513.10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.004Search in Google Scholar
Dallas, Andrea C. & Edith Kaan. 2008. Second language processing of filler-gap dependencies by late leaners. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(3). 372–388.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00056.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dussias, Paola E. & Nuria Sagarra 2007. The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1). 101–116.10.1017/S1366728906002847Search in Google Scholar
Dussias, Paola. E., Jorge. R. Valdés Kroff, Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo & Chip Gerfen. 2013. When gender and looking go hand in hand. Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35. 353–387.10.1017/S0272263112000915Search in Google Scholar
Federmeier, Kara D. 2007. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44(4). 491–505.10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.xSearch in Google Scholar
Federmeier, Kara. D., Marta Kutas & Rina Schul. 2010. Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language 115(3). 149–161.10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006Search in Google Scholar
Foucart, Alice, Clara D. Martin, Eva M. Moreno and Albert Costa. 2014. Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 40(5). 1461–1469.10.1037/a0036756Search in Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl & Joel Pynte. 1997. Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 50(1). 119–148.10.1080/027249897392251Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1). 1–76.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1Search in Google Scholar
Goethe Institut. 2010. German Placement Test. http://www.goethe.de/cgi-bin/einstufungstest/einstufungstest.pl (accessed 22/08/2013).Search in Google Scholar
Grüter, Theres, Lew-Williams Casey & Anne Fernald 2012. Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research 28(2). 191–215.10.1177/0267658312437990Search in Google Scholar
Grüter, Theres & Hannah Rohde. 2013. L2 processing is affected by RAGE: Evidence from reference resolution. Talk Presented at the 12th Conference on Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA) University of Florida, FL.Search in Google Scholar
Havik, Else, Leah Roberts, Roeland Van Hout, Robert Schreuder & Marco Haverkort. 2009. Processing subject-object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning 59(1). 73–112.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00501.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hemforth, Barbara & Lars Konieczny. 2000. German Sentence Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-015-9618-3Search in Google Scholar
Hopp, Holger. 2006. Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research 22. 369–397.10.1191/0267658306sr272oaSearch in Google Scholar
Hopp, Holger. 2009. The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and online performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(4). 463–483.10.1017/S1366728909990253Search in Google Scholar
Hopp, Holger. 2010. Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua 120. 901–931.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004Search in Google Scholar
Hopp, Holger. 2013. Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research 29(1). 33–56.10.1177/0267658312461803Search in Google Scholar
Hopp, Holger. 2014. Individual differences in the L2 processing of object-subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716413000180 (accessed 23/03/2015).10.1017/S0142716413000180Search in Google Scholar
Hoshino, Norkio, Paola E. Dussias & Judith F. Kroll. 2010. Processing subject-verb agreement in a second language depends on proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13. 87–98.10.1017/S1366728909990034Search in Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk, Joost Rommers & Antje S. Meyer. 2011. Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica 137(2). 151–171.10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, Carrie N. 2008. Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntactic information during L2 sentence processing. Language Learning 58(4). 875–909.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00481.xSearch in Google Scholar
Jackson, Carrie N. & Susan C. Bobb. 2009. The processing and comprehension of wh-questions among second language speakers of German. Applied Psycholinguistics 30. 630–636.10.1017/S014271640999004XSearch in Google Scholar
Jackson, Carrie N. & Paola E. Dussias. 2009. Cross-linguistic differences and their impact on L2 sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1). 65–82.10.1017/S1366728908003908Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, Carrie N., Paola E. Dussias & Adelina Hristova. 2012. Using eye-tracking to study on-line processing among intermediate L2 learners of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching 50. 101–133.10.1515/iral-2012-0005Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, Carrie N. & Leah Roberts. 2010. Animacy affects the processing of subject-object ambiguities in the L2: Evidence from self-paced reading with German L2 learners of Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics 31. 671–691.10.1017/S0142716410000196Search in Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian. & Neal E. Snider. 2013. Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127(1). 57–83.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, Nan. 2004. Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 25. 603–634.10.1037/e537102012-523Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, Nan. 2007. Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1). 1–33.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kaan, Edith. 2014. Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(4). 257–282.10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaaSearch in Google Scholar
Kaan, Edith, Andrea C. Dallas & Frank Wijnen. 2010. Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing. In Jan-Wouter Zwart & Mark de Vries (eds.), Structure preserved. Festschrift in the honor of Jan Koster, 207–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.164.23kaaSearch in Google Scholar
Kamide, Yuki 2008 Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 647–670.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kamide, Yuki, Gerry T. M. Altmann & Sarah L. Haywood. 2003. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49. 133–159.10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8Search in Google Scholar
Kamide, Yuki, Christoph Scheepers & Gerry T. M. Altmann. 2003. Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(1). 37–55.10.1023/A:1021933015362Search in Google Scholar
Kilborn, Kerry 1989. Sentence Processing in a Second Language: The Timing of Transfer. Language and Speech 32. 1–23.10.1177/002383098903200101Search in Google Scholar
Knoeferle, Pia & Matthew W. Crocker. 2007. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: evidence from eye movement. Journal of Memory and Language 57(4). 519–543.10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.003Search in Google Scholar
Knoeferle, Pia, Matthew W. Crocker, Christoph Scheepers & Martin J. Pickering. 2005. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition 95. 95–127.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Koehne, Judith & Matthew W. Crocker. 2010. Top-down Cues Help to Understand Foreign Language Input and Improve Word Learning’, Talk presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the European Second Language Association Conference (EUROSLA), Reggio Emilia, Italy.Search in Google Scholar
Lardiere, Donna. 2000. Mapping features to forms in SLA. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, 102–129. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Levy, Roger. 2008. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106(3). 1126–1177.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006Search in Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, Casey & Anne Fernald. 2007. Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science 18(2). 193–198.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01871.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, Casey & Anne Fernald. 2010. Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 63(4). 447–464.10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian & Elizabeth Bates. 1989. The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Marian, Viorica & Michael J. Spivey. 2003. Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6. 97–115.10.1017/S1366728903001068Search in Google Scholar
McDonald, Janet. 2006. Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language 55. 381–401.10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, Mary G., Carrie N. Jackson & Christine E. Gardner. 2014. Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(1). 27–70.10.1017/S0142716412000252Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Hui-Yu & Claudia Felser. 2011. Referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading. Lingua 121. 221–236.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2013. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4). 329–347.10.1017/S0140525X12001495Search in Google Scholar
Prévost, Phillippe & Lydia White. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2). 103–133.10.1191/026765800677556046Search in Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 134(3). 372–422.10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Leah. 2012. Individual differences in L2 sentence processing. Language Learning 62(2). 172–188.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00711.xSearch in Google Scholar
Shook, Anthony & Viorica Marian. 2012. Bimodal bilinguals coactivate both languages during spoken comprehension. Cognition 124. 314–324.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.014Search in Google Scholar
Skut, W., T. Brants, B. Krenn & Hans Uszkoreit 1998. A Linguistically Interpreted Corpus of German Newspaper Text. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI Workshop on Recent Advances in Corpus Annotation, Saarbrucken, Germany.Search in Google Scholar
Snedeker, Jesse & John C. Trueswell 2004. The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology 49(3). 238–299.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Spivey, Michael J. & Viorica Marian. 1999. Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science 10(3). 281–284.10.1111/1467-9280.00151Search in Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael K., Michael Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy. 1995. Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension. Science 268. 1632–1634.10.1126/science.7777863Search in Google Scholar
Trenkic, Danjiela, Jelena Mirkovic & Gerry T. Altmann. 2013. Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition doi:10.1017/S1366728913000321.doi:10.1017/S1366728913000321Search in Google Scholar
Ullman, Michael T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice, 141–178. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Van Berkum, Jos J. A. Brown, M. Colin, Pieni Zwitserlood, Valesca Kooijman & Peter Hagoort 2005. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31. 443–467.10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443Search in Google Scholar
Van Heugten, Marieke, Delphine Dahan, Elizabeth K. Johnson & Anne Christophe. 2012. Accommodating syntactic violations during online speech perception. Poster Presented at CUNY Conference 2012 (March 15).Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Andrea & Anne Cutler. 2004. Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 1–25.10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Andrea, Martine Grice & Crocker Matthew W. 2006. The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: a study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition 99(2). B63–B72.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, Christine & Helen Neville. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specialization for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8. 231–256.10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.231Search in Google Scholar
Wicha, Nicole Y., Y. Moreno, M. Eva & Marta Kutas. 2004. Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(7). 1272–1288.10.1162/0898929041920487Search in Google Scholar
Williams, John C. 2006. Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(1). 71–88.10.1017/S1366728905002385Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Frances. 2007. Integration of morphosyntactic and semantic information in L2 learners. Proceedings of the Boston university conference on language development 31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Frances. 2009. Processing at the Syntax-Discourse Interface in Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
