Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 20, 2018

Development of Novel Electronic Nose Applied for Strawberry Freshness Detection during Storage

  • Mengke Xing , Ke Sun , Qiang Liu , Leiqing Pan and Kang Tu EMAIL logo

Abstract

A newly self-developed electronic nose (E-nose) system for the detection of “Hongyan” strawberry freshness at different storage periods was studied. The system consisted of six metal oxide semiconductor sensors connected to a data acquisition system and a computer with pattern recognition software. The aroma emitted by “Hongyan” strawberry samples was detected during post-harvesting storage, and stable E-nose response values were used to develop cluster analysis and classification models. The successive projections algorithm was employed to optimize the sensors array, and the results obtained by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis proved that the optimized sensor array was feasible to differentiate decayed strawberries from fresh ones. Partial least squares discriminant analysis and support vector machine (SVM) models were built. Accuracy of 94.9 % on the testing set was obtained based on the optimized sensor array, and this result was satisfactory compared to that of commercial PEN3 E-nose.

Funding statement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31671925] and by Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [grant number 201303088].

References

[1] FAOSTAT, Production, crops. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC). Accessed 13 February 2018Search in Google Scholar

[2] Forney CF. Horticultural and other factors affecting aroma volatile composition of small fruit. Hort Technol. 2001;35:1022–26.10.21273/HORTTECH.11.4.529Search in Google Scholar

[3] Forney CF, Kalt W, Jordan MA. The composition of strawberry aroma is influenced by cultivar, maturity, and storage. Hortscience. 2000;11:529–38.10.21273/HORTSCI.35.6.1022Search in Google Scholar

[4] Miazczak A, Cf F, Prange RK. Development of aroma volatiles and color during postharvest ripening of Kent strawberries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1995;120:650–55.10.21273/JASHS.120.4.650Search in Google Scholar

[5] Perez Ana G., Rios Jose J., Sanz Carlos., Olias Jose M.. Aroma components and free amino acids in strawberry variety Chandler during ripening. J Agri Food Chem. 1992;40(11):2232–3510.1021/jf00023a036Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ampuero S, Bosset JO. The electronic nose applied to dairy products: a review. Sens Actuators B. 2003;94:1–12. 00321-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4005(03).Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gómez AH, Wang J, Hu GX, et al. Monitoring storage shelf life of tomato using electronic nose technique. J Food Eng. 2008;85:625–31.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.06.039Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hui GH, Wu YL, Ye DD, et al. Fuji apple storage time predictive method using electronic nose. Food Anal Methods. 2013;6:82–88.10.1007/s12161-012-9414-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hui GH, Jin JJ, Deng SG, et al. Winter jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Mill.) quality forecasting method based on electronic nose. Food Chem. 2015;170:484–91.10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Konduru T, Rains GC, Li CY. Detecting sour skin infected onions using a customized gas sensor array. J Food Eng. 2015;160:19–27.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.03.025Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sanaeifar A, Mohtasebi SS, Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, et al. Application of MOS based electronic nose for the prediction of banana quality properties. Measurement. 2016;82:105–14.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.041Search in Google Scholar

[12] Soares SFC, Gomes AA, Filho ARG, et al. The successive projections algorithm. Trends Anal Chem. 2013;42:84–98.10.1016/j.trac.2012.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pontes MJC, Galvao RKH, Araujo MCU, et al. The successive projections algorithm for spectral variable selection in classification problems. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2005;78:11–18.10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gourvénec S, Capron X, Massart DL. Genetic algorithms (GA) applied to the orthogonal projection approach (OPA) for variable selection. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;519:11–21.10.1016/j.aca.2004.05.023Search in Google Scholar

[15] Llobet E, Brezmes J, Gualdron O, et al. Building parsimonious fuzzy ARTMAP models by variable selection with a cascaded genetic algorithm: application to multisensor systems for gas analysis. Sens Actuators B. 2004;99:267–72.10.1016/j.snb.2003.11.019Search in Google Scholar

[16] Xu Z, Lu SS. Multi-objective optimization of sensor array using genetic algorithm. Sens Actuators B. 2011;160:278–86. 2011. 07.048. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pan LQ, Zhang W, Zhu N, et al. Early detection and classification of pathogenic fungal disease in post-harvest strawberry fruit by electronic nose and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Food Res Int. 2014;62:162–68.10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.020Search in Google Scholar

[18] Qiu SS, Wang J, Gao LP. Qualification and quantisation of processed strawberry juice based on electronic nose and tongue. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2015;60:115–23.10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.041Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zhao XJ, Wu HL, Pan LQ, et al. Nondestructive prediction of postharvest strawberry quality by electronic nose. Food Sci. 2015;35:105–09. (in Chinese). DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201418021.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Peneau S, P B Brockhoff, Escher F, Juessli J. A comprehensive approach to evaluate the freshness of strawberries and carrots. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2007;45:20–2910.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[21] Arshak K, Moore E, Lyons GM, et al. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens Rev. 2004;24:181–98. 4105 25977. DOI: 10.1108/02602280.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Yan J, Guo XZ, Duan SK, et al. Electronic nose feature extraction methods: A review. Sensors. 2015;15:27804–31.10.3390/s151127804Search in Google Scholar

[23] Jiang S, Wang J. Internal quality detection of Chinese pecans (Carya cathayensis) during storage using electronic nose responses combined with physicochemical methods. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016;118:17–25.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.03.016Search in Google Scholar

[24] Araujo MCU, Saldanha TCB, Galvao RKH, et al. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2001;57:65–73.10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00119-8Search in Google Scholar

[25] Galvao RKH, Araujo MCU, Jose GE, et al. A method for calibration and validation subset partitioning. Talanta. 2005;67:736–40.10.1016/j.talanta.2005.03.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. Acm T Intel Syst Tec. 2011;2:389–96.10.1145/1961189.1961199Search in Google Scholar

[27] Azodanlou R, Darbellay C, Luisier, JL, et al. Changes in flavour and texture during the ripening of strawberries. Eur Food Res Technol. 2004;218:167–72.10.1007/s00217-003-0822-0Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sanz C, Richardson DG, Perez AG. 2,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)- furanone and derivatives in strawberries during ripening. Fruit Flavors. 1995;596:268–75.10.1021/bk-1995-0596.ch024Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zhang YT, Wang GX, Dong J, et al. Analysis of volatile components in strawberry cultivars Xingdu 1 and Xingdu 2 and their parents. Agric Sci China. 2009;8:441–46.10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60230-8Search in Google Scholar

[30] Nieminen T, Neubauer P, Sivela S, et al. Volatile compounds produced by fungi grown in strawberry jam. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2008;41:2051–56.10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.009Search in Google Scholar

[31] Dong DM, Zhao CJ, Zheng WG, et al. Analyzing strawberry spoilage via its volatile compounds using longpath fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1–7.10.1038/srep02585Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Xing HJ, Di HT, Cai Y, et al. Prediction model for decay index of strawberry fruit based on ethanol content. Trans CSAE. 2010;26:352–56. (in Chinese). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.05.0.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-04-08
Revised: 2018-07-04
Accepted: 2018-07-10
Published Online: 2018-07-20

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2018-0111/html
Scroll to top button