Abstract
Introduction
Maternal attitudes have been shown to impact adolescent girls’ sexual decision making and attitudes towards contraception. Given the potential for maternal influence on adolescent contraceptive use, we undertook an exploratory study of mothers’ perceptions of the maternal role in adolescent contraceptive decision making, and maternal perceptions of long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) for adolescent girls.
Materials and methods
We utilized a mixed methods study design. Acceptability of contraceptive methods and attitudes towards adolescent contraceptive use were assessed using a paper survey of 162 mothers of girls aged 11–19 years in Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Seven survey participants completed subsequent semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed using grounded theory methodology.
Results
Pills, condoms and injections were most frequently selected as acceptable by 55.4%, 55.4%, and 51.6% of women, respectively. One or more LARC methods were selected by 16.6% of the women. Of those (94.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that, “It is expected of me to make sure that my daughter knows about birth control methods.” Important themes that emerged during interviews were the responsibility mothers felt to help their daughters navigate contraception options, appreciation of the effectiveness of LARC methods and concerns about the use of those methods by teenagers due to the invasiveness.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that mothers want to be involved and support adolescent decision making about contraceptives. We also found that mothers viewed LARC as less acceptable than other forms of birth control for adolescents and have specific concerns about LARC. These results suggest directions for future work to better characterize the impact of maternal attitudes on adolescent LARC use.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Case Western Reserve University Master of Public Health Program.
[1] Commendador KA. Parental influences on adolescent decision making and contraceptive use. Pediatr Nurs. 2010;36:147–56, 170.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Short MB, Yates JK, Biro F, Rosenthal SL. Parents and partners: enhancing participation in contraception use. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005;18:379–83.10.1016/j.jpag.2005.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Guilamo-Ramos V, Bouris A, Lee J, McCarthy K, Michael SL, Pitt-Barnes S, et al. Paternal influences on adolescent sexual risk behaviors: a structured literature review. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1313–25.10.1542/peds.2011-2066Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Hutchinson MK, Jemmott JB, Jemmott LS, Braverman P, Fong GT. The role of mother-daughter sexual risk communication in reducing sexual risk behaviors among urban adolescent females: a prospective study. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2003;33:98–107.10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00183-6Search in Google Scholar
[5] Harris AL. “I got caught up in the game”: generational influences on contraceptive decision making in African-American women. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013;25:156–65.10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00772.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Daley AM. What influences adolescents’ contraceptive decision-making? A meta-ethnography. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29:614–32.10.1016/j.pedn.2014.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Khurana A, Cooksey EC. Examining the effect of maternal sexual communication and adolescents’ perceptions of maternal disapproval on adolescent risky sexual involvement. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:557–65.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4 Suppl):S14–21.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. (NCHS Data Brief). Report No.: 173 2014.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Barrett M, Soon R, Whitaker AK, Takekawa S, Kaneshiro B. Awareness and knowledge of the intrauterine device in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25:39–42.10.1016/j.jpag.2011.08.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Fleming KL, Sokoloff A, Raine TR. Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception. 2010;82:178–82.10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] Teal SB, Romer SE. Awareness of long-acting reversible contraception among teens and young adults. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2013;52(4 Suppl):S35–9.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Eisenberg D, McNicholas C, Peipert JF. Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4, Supplement):S59–63.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] Kohn JE, Hacker JG, Rousselle MA, Gold M. Knowledge and likelihood to recommend intrauterine devices for adolescents among school-based health center providers. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:319–24.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Greenberg KB, Makino KK, Coles MS. Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2013;52:372–4.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] Madden T, Secura G, Maddipati R, Peipert J. Influence of friends’ and family’s contraceptive experience on contraceptive decisions. Contraception. 2013;88:436.10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.028Search in Google Scholar
[17] Melo J, Peters M, Teal S, Guiahi M. Adolescent and young women’s contraceptive decision-making processes: choosing “The Best Method for Her.”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:224–8.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] Hartman LB, Shafer M-A, Pollack LM, Wibbelsman C, Chang F, Tebb KP. Parental acceptability of contraceptive methods offered to their teen during a confidential health care visit. J Adolesc Health [Internet]. 2013;52:251–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823498/.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] State Policies in Brief: An Overview of minors’ consent law [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute, 2014. Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OMCL.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 2013:305 pp.Search in Google Scholar
[21] Brewer NT, Fazekas KI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45:107–14.10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Jones RK, Boonstra H. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:182–91.10.1363/3618204Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Behav. 1984;11:1–47.10.1177/109019818401100101Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl PDJ, Beckmann DJ, editors. Action control [Internet]SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 1985:11–39.10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2Search in Google Scholar
[25] Jaccard J, Dodge T, Dittus P. Parent-adolescent communication about sex and birth control: a conceptual framework. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2002;2002:9–42.10.1002/cd.48Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995;311:251–3.10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[27] Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira, 2011:682 pp.Search in Google Scholar
[28] van Teijlingen E, Forrest K. The range of qualitative research methods in family planning and reproductive health care. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2004;30:171–3.10.1783/1471189041261519Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[29] Jaccard J, Levitz N. Counseling adolescents about contraception: towards the development of an evidence-based protocol for contraceptive counselors. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S6–13.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Braverman PK, Adelman WP, Alderman EM, Breuner CC, Levine DA, Marcell AV, et al. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e1244–56.10.1542/peds.2014-2299Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] Committee Opinion No. 539: Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:983–8.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] Ricketts S, Klingler G, Schwalberg R. Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:125–32.10.1363/46e1714Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
