Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 4, 2017

Back pain in pregnancy among office workers: risk factors and its impact on quality of life

  • Beng Kwang Ng EMAIL logo , Mardiana Kipli , Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim , Suhaila Shohaimi , Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani and Pei Shan Lim

Abstract

Background

Back pain is a common presenting complaint during pregnancy and it is often being considered as part of the pregnancy process. The purpose of the study is to investigate the prevalence of back pain in pregnancy, risk factors and its impact on the quality of life in pregnant women.

Materials and methods

Three hundred and fifty-eight pregnant women who attended the antenatal clinic in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Medical Centre were recruited in this cross-sectional study from October 2011 until April 2012. The back pain was further classified into lumbar pain and posterior pelvic pain. The severity of back pain was assessed using visual analoque scale (VAS) and the functional limitation was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ).

Result

The prevalence of back pain in pregnancy was 84.6%. Occupation and previous history of back pain were associated with back pain in pregnancy. In terms of functional limitation disability, total ODQ score was statistically significant correlate with severity of pain (VAS score). Personal care, sitting, standing, sex life and social life were significantly affected.

Conclusion

The risk factors for back pain in pregnancy were type of occupation and history of back pain. The higher VAS score, the more ODQ will be affected. Personal care, sitting, standing, sex life and social life were significantly affected.

Acknowledgment

The authors wished to thank the staff in the antenatal clinic and the patients who had participated in this study.

Author Statement

  1. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals.

  4. Ethical approval: The research related to human use complies with all the relevant national regulations and institutional policies, was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration. This study was approved by UKM Research Ethics Committee (UKMREC) and given the project code FF-383-2011.

  5. Submission declaration: The study was presented as oral presentation at 2nd O&G Scientific Meeting at Hotel Palace of the Golden Horses, Malaysia on 13th April 2012.

References

[1] ThorellE, KristianssonP. Pregnancy related back pain, is it related to aerobic fitness? A longitudinal cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;17:1230.10.1186/1471-2393-12-30Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] MogrenIM, PohjanenAI. Low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors. Spine. 2005;30:98391.10.1097/01.brs.0000158957.42198.8eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Mohseni-BandpeiMA, FakhriM, Ahmad-ShirvaniM, Bagheri-NessamiM, KhalilianAR, Shayesteh-AzarM, et al.Low back pain in 1,100 Iranian pregnant women: prevalence and risk factors. Spine J. 2009;9:795801.10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] EldenH, GutkeA, Kjelby-WendtG, Fagevik-OlsenM, OstgaardHC. Predictors and consequences of long-term pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: a longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:276.10.1186/s12891-016-1154-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] MalmqvistS, KjaermannI, AndersenK, ØklandI, BrønnickK, LarsenJP. Prevalence of low back and pelvic pain during pregnancy in a Norwegian population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35:2728.10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] MensJM, Huis in’t VeldYH, Pool-GoudzwaardA, YvonneH, Huis in’t VeldYH, Pool-GoudzwaardA. Severity of signs and symptoms in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy. Man Ther. 2012;17:1759.10.1016/j.math.2011.12.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] ChiaYY, LoY, ChenYB, LiuCP, HuangWC, WenCH. Risk of chronic low back pain among parturient who undergo cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia: A nationwide population based retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e346810.1097/MD.0000000000003468Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] MogrenIM. BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1093102.10.1007/s00586-005-0004-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] NorénL, OstgaardÖstgaardS, NielsenTF, OstgaardÖstgaardHC. Reduction of sick leave for lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine. 1997;22:215760.10.1097/00007632-199709150-00013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] MoonWN, KimMY, OhHJ, SuhSW, KimIC, CoiYH, et al.Incidence and risk factors of pelvic pain in pregnancy. J Korean Spine Surg. 2000;7:25963.Search in Google Scholar

[11] BergstromC, PerssonM, MogrenI. Sick leave and healthcare utilisation in women reporting pregnancy related low back pain and/or pelvic girdle pain 14 months postpartum. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24:7.10.1186/s12998-016-0088-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] [12] WHO/IOTF/IASO. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Hong Kong: World Health Organization, International Obesity Task Force, International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[13] ToWW, WongMW. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:108691.10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00235.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] WangSM, DezinnoP, MaranetsI, BermanMR, Caldwell-AndrewsAA, KainZN. Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:6570.10.1097/01.AOG.0000129403.54061.0eSearch in Google Scholar

[15] JenniferS, JonathanNG. Pregnancy and low back pain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008;1:13741.10.1007/s12178-008-9021-8Search in Google Scholar

[16] OstgaardHC, ZetherströmG, Roos-HanssonE. Back pain in relation to pregnancy; a 6-years follow-up. Spine. 1997;22:294550.10.1097/00007632-199712150-00018Search in Google Scholar

[17] EndresenEH. Pelvic pain and low back pain in pregnant women-an epidemiological study. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24:13541.10.3109/03009749509099301Search in Google Scholar

[18] BrynhildsenJ, HanssonA, PerssonA, HammarM. Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:1826.10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00630-3Search in Google Scholar

[19] WangSM. Backaches related to pregnancy: the risk factors, etiologies, treatment and controversial issues. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003;16:26973.10.1097/00001503-200306000-00005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] ShimMJ, LeeYS. Effects of a back pain reducing program during pregnancy for Korean women: a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;44:1928.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] OstgaardHC, Roos-HanssonE, ZetherstromG. Regression of back and posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. Spine. 1996;21:277780.10.1097/00007632-199612010-00013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] LiddleSD, PennickV. Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;30:CD001139.10.1002/14651858.CD001139.pub4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2017-6-1
Accepted: 2017-7-4
Published Online: 2017-9-4

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2017-0037/html
Scroll to top button