Abstract
This paper has two goals: First it offers some theoretical reflections on the relations between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Secondly, the paper discusses a case study as an instance of constructionalization, arguing in favor of the passive interpretation of the Italian construction formed by the verb vedersi ‘to see oneself’ followed by the past participle. The synchronic description of the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic features of this construction in Modern Italian is accompanied by a diachronic investigation based on a corpus of texts from the thirteenth century on. Results show the gradual emergence of the passive interpretation through reanalysis of a reflexive construction and the development of idiosyncratic semantic and pragmatic features distinguishing the vedersi-construction from the standard essere ‘be’-passive.
References
Abraham, Werner. 2006. Introduction: Passivization and typology. Form vs. function: A confined survey into the research status quo. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisjö (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function, 1–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.68Search in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Arrivé, Michel, Françoise Gadet & Michel Galmiche. 1986. La grammaire d’aujourd’hui: Guide alphabétique de linguistique française. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.). 2015. Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18Search in Google Scholar
Bartra Kaufmann, Anna. 2002. La pasiva i les construccions que s’hi relacionen. In Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, volum 2, 2111–2179. Barcelona: Editorial EmpúriesSearch in Google Scholar
Battaglia, Salvatore. 1961–2002. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Torino: UTET.Search in Google Scholar
Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot, Hava. 1981. A propos de la forme passive ‘se voir+Vinf’. Folia Linguistica 15(3–4). 387–407.Search in Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald (eds.). 2008. Constructions and language change. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211757Search in Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Violeta Demonte. 1999. Gramatica descriptiva de la lengua Española. Vol. II. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Adam Ledgeway. 2016. The structure of the clause. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), Romance languages, 556–574. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0031Search in Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections of grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.09dieSearch in Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova. 2012. “Paradigmatic integration”: The fourth stage in expanded grammaticalization scenario. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.130.05dieSearch in Google Scholar
Franckel, Jean-Jacques. 1989. Etude de quelques marqueurs aspectuels du français. Genève : Librairie Droz S.A.Search in Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò. 2014. Venire (‘come’) as a passive auxiliary in Italian. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ off the Beaten Grammaticalization Path, 21–44. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110335989.21Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice. 1993. Le bon Usage, treisième éd. par André Goose. Paris et Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–72.10.1075/sl.14.1.03hasSearch in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries, cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam & New York: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.08heiSearch in Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 19–40. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer. 2007. Passives in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I, 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006Search in Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23Search in Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 2006. Empathy and direct discourse perspectives. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 315–343. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470756959.ch14Search in Google Scholar
Lamiroy, Béatrice. 1999. Auxiliaires, langues romanes et grammaticalisation. Langages 135. 63–75.10.3406/lgge.1999.2201Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982 [1995]. Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. In Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien Projektes, Nr. 48. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. München: LINCOM EUROPA, 1995.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian, José Pinto de Lima & Rute Soares. 2010. Periphrastic voice with ‘see’ in Portuguese. In Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Paradigmaticity and obligatoriness. London: Routledge (Acta Linguistica Hafnensia 42 (1),75–100).10.1080/03740463.2010.487748Search in Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca. 2012. Costruzioni verbo-pronominali “intensive” in italiano. In P. M. Bertinetto, Atti del XLII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI)- Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore (25–27 settembre 2008). Vol. II (CD-ROM) C.2.Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Anna Giacalone Ramat. 2012. The development of Italian adversative connectives: Factors at play and stages of grammaticalization. Linguistics 50(2). 191–239.10.1515/ling-2012-0008Search in Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1996. Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C.-T. James Huang & Audrey Li Yen-Hui (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6Search in Google Scholar
Polzin, Claudia. 1998. Der Funktionsbereich Passiv im Französischen: Ein Beitrag aus kontrastiver Sicht. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellat & René Rioul. 2016. Grammaire Méthodique du Français. 6ème éd. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 1991. I complementi predicativi. In Lorenzo Renzi & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. II, 191–226. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea & Anna Giacalone Ramat. 2016. Deictic motion verbs as passive auxiliaries: The case of Italian andare ‘go’ (and venire ‘come’). Transactions of the Philological Society 114. 1–24.10.1111/1467-968X.12059Search in Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passive and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848.10.2307/414491Search in Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 1993. Stabilità e instabilità nei caratteri originali dell’italiano. In Alberto Sobrero (a cura di). Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo: Le strutture, 41–100. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca. 2012. Sembra ma non è: Studio semantico-lessicale sui verbi con complemento predicativo. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Search in Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C. 2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 51–79. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.02traSearch in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 557–577.10.1515/flin.2014.018Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston