Abstract
In this paper we will take a journey back in time and up to our days through the historical development of Cognitive Linguistics, especially but not only in the United States. In this journey we will show the most essential steps taken by several researchers who have contributed from diverse disciplines, not only Linguistics but also Psychology, Neuroscience, Computer Science or Mathematics, to the fruitful evolution of Cognitive Linguistics in the last fifty years. From Chomsky’s and Propp’s theories to the Neural Theory of Metaphor we will travel by the hand of Prof. George Lakoff, probably one of the most important American scholars who has devoted his academic life to the intensive and extensive research of this vast and attractive knowledge area.
Resumen
En este artículo realizaremos un viaje en el tiempo y hasta nuestros días a través del desarrollo histórico de la lingüística cognitiva, especialmente, pero no solo en los Estados Unidos. En nuestro viaje mostraremos los pasos esenciales seguidos por varios investigadores que han contribuido desde distintas disciplinas, no únicamente la lingüística sino también la psicología, las neurociencias, la informática y las ciencias de la computación o las matemáticas, a la fructífera evolución de la lingüística cognitiva en los últimos cincuenta años. Desde las teorías de Chomsky y de Propp a la teoría neuronal de la metáfora, viajaremos de la mano del Prof. George Lakoff, uno de los más importantes estudiosos estadounidenses que ha dedicado su vida académica a la investigación intensiva y extensiva de esta amplia y atractiva área de conocimiento.
Zusammenfassung
Mit diesem Beitrag unternehmen wir eine Zeitreise durch die historische Entwicklung der kognitiven Linguistik bis zur Gegenwart, vor allem, aber nicht nur mit Blick auf die USA. Dabei konzentrieren wir uns auf die wichtigsten Schritte, mit denen die Forschung aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen, – nicht nur aus der Linguistik, sondern auch aus der Psychologie, aus den Neurowissenschaften, der Informatik und Mathematik, – in den letzten fünfzig Jahren die fruchtbare Entwicklung der kognitiven Linguistik vorangetrieben hat. Ausgehend von Chomsky’s und Propps Ansätzen zu einer neuronalen Theorie der Metapher reisen wir unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. George Lakoff, wahrscheinlich einer der wichtigsten amerikanischen Gelehrten, der sein akademisches Leben der intensiven und extensiven Forschung zu dem weiten und attraktiven Gebiet der kognitiven Linguistik, insbesondere der Erforschung von Metaphern gewidmet hat.
Acknowledgement
This interview has been possible thanks to the postdoctoral aid granted by the Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Política Científica of the Universitat de València within the subprogram ‘Attraction of Talent’, and in the framework agreement signed by the University of California, Berkeley, the Andalusia-Tech and the VLC-Campus (Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Universitat de València).
Bibliography
Asanovic, Krste; Beck, James; Feldman, Jerry; Morgan, Nelson & John Wawrzynek. 1993. Designing A Connectionist Network Supercomputer. International Journal of Neural Systems 4(4), 317–326.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, David; Chang, Nancy; Feldman, Jerome & Srini Narayanan. 1998. Extending embodied lexical development. Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 84–89.Search in Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K.; Lindsay, Shane, Matlock, Teeny & Srini Narayanan. 2007. Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science 31(5), 733–764.Search in Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. London: Mouton, 1957.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Language and the study of mind. Tokyo: Sansyusya Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. Language and thought. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.Search in Google Scholar
Dennison, Heeyeon Y. & Benjamin K. Bergen. 2010. Language-driven motor simulation is sensitive to social context. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 901–906. Portland, OR.Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 2003. Mappings in thought and language. The European legacy 8(6), 839–840.Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Feldman, Jerome. 2007. Her story of cognitive science. Artificial Intelligence 171(18): 1107–1109.10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.007Search in Google Scholar
Feldman, Jerome & Srini Narayanan. 2004. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and language 89(2), 385–392.Search in Google Scholar
Feldman, Jerome; Lakoff, George; Bailey, David; Narayanan, Srini; Regier, Terry & Andreas Stolcke. 1996. L0-the first five years of an automated language acquisition project. Artificial Intelligence Review 10(1–2), 103–129.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and Poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1968. Child language. Aphasia and phonological universals, The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783111353562Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1978. Six lectures on sound and meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1995. On language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, Frederic; Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves & Benjamin K. Bergen. 2008. Computational Models in the Debate over Language Learnability. Infant and Child Development 17, 55–80.Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2003. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2006. Language, mind, and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2008. Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual review of cognitive linguistics 6(1): 168–184.10.1075/arcl.6.08kovSearch in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant!: know your values and frame the debate: the essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2005. Thinking points (with the Rockridge Institute). New York: Farrar Strauss Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2006. Whose freedom? New York: Farrar Strauss Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2008. The political mind. New York: Viking/Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Zoltán Kövecses. 1987. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Dorothy Holland, and Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, 195–221.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Rafael E. Núñez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Elisabeth Wehling. 2012. The Little Blue Book: The essential guide to thinking and talking democratic. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume II, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Narayanan, Srini. 1997. Embodiment in language understanding: Sensory-motor representations for metaphoric reasoning about event descriptions. University of California, Berkeley: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Narayanan, Srini. 1999. Moving Right Along: A Computational Model of Metaphoric Reasoning about Events. AAAI/IAAI, 121–127.Search in Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser. 2006. With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30(3), 401–450.Search in Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1968. Morphology of the Tale. Austin, TX: American Folklore Society and Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar
Radden, Gunter & Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. Metonymy in language and thought 4, 17–60.Search in Google Scholar
Regier, Terry. 1996. The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3608.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1978. The Relation of Grammar to Cognition. TINLAP ’78 Proceedings of the 1978 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing, 14–24.Search in Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2003. The Representation of Spatial Structure in Spoken and Signed Languages: a Neural Model. Language and Linguistics 4(2): 207–250.Search in Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2004. Recombinance in the Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Panels, 1–28. Eds. Jonathon E. Cihlar, David Kaiser, Irene Kimbara & Amy Franklin. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1996. The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford University Press (USA).Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 2001. Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society. Oxford University Press (USA).Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 2014. The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity, and the Human Spark. Oxford University Press (USA).Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Esther J.; Bergen, Benjamin K. & Rafael E. Núñez. 2014. Disentangling Spatial Metaphors for Time Using Non-spatial Responses and Auditory Stimuli. Metaphor and Symbol 29(4): 316–327.10.1080/10926488.2014.948801Search in Google Scholar
Wheeler, Kathryn & Benjamin K. Bergen. 2010. Meaning in the palm of your hand. In Sally Rice and John Newman (eds.) Empirical and experimental methods in conceptual structure, discourse, and language, chapter 18. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Note
The author is a member of SILVA - Group of Support for Investigation in Language Variation Analysis. The SILVA Group is a multidisciplinary team of scholars based in the Universitat de València (UV), the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV), and the Universidad de Alicante (UA).
© 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston