Abstract
Objectives
The transition from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the medical ward is a high-risk period due to medical complexity, reduced patient monitoring, and diagnostic uncertainty. Standardized handoff practices reduce errors associated with transitions of care, but little work has been done to standardize the ICU to ward handoff. Further, tools that exist do not focus on preventing diagnostic error. Using Human-Centered Design methods we previously created a novel EHR-based ICU-ward handoff tool (ICU-PAUSE) that embeds a diagnostic pause at the time of transfer. This study aims to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing a diagnostic pause at the ICU-to-ward transition.
Methods
This is a multi-center qualitative study of semi-structured interviews with intensivists from ten academic medical centers. Interviews were analyzed iteratively through a grounded theory approach. The Sittig-Singh sociotechnical model was used as a unifying conceptual framework.
Results
Across the eight domains of the model, we identified major benefits and barriers to implementation. The embedded pause to address diagnostic uncertainty was recognized as a key benefit. Participants agreed that standardization of verbal and written handoff would decrease variation in communication. The main barriers fell within the domains of workflow, institutional culture, people, and assessment.
Conclusions
This study represents a novel application of the Sittig-Singh model in the assessment of a handoff tool. A unique feature of ICU-PAUSE is the explicit acknowledgement of diagnostic uncertainty, a practice that has been shown to reduce medical error and prevent premature closure. Results will be used to inform future multi-site implementation efforts.
-
Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors state no competing of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
References
1. Patel, SJ, Landrigan, CP. Communication at transitions of care. Pediatr Clin 2019;66:751–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Riesenberg, LA, Leitzsch, J, Massucci, JL, Jaeger, J, Rosenfeld, JC, Patow, C, et al.. Residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med 2009;84:1775–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181bf51a6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Santhosh, L, Lyons, PG, Rojas, JC, Ciesielski, TM, Beach, S, Farnan, JM, et al.. Characterising ICU-ward handoffs at three academic medical centres: process and perceptions. BMJ Qual Saf 2019;28:627–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008328.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Dunlop, M, Schwartzstein, RM. Reducing diagnostic error in the intensive care unit. Engaging uncertainty when teaching clinical reasoning. ATS Sch 2020;1:364–71. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0043ps.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Santhosh, L, Cornell, E, Rojas, JC, Lyons, P. Diagnostic safety across transitions of care throughout the healthcare system: current state and a call to action. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2023.Search in Google Scholar
6. Abraham, J, Nguyen, V, Almoosa, KF, Patel, B, Patel, VL. Falling through the cracks: information breakdowns in critical care handoff communication. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011;2011:28–37.Search in Google Scholar
7. Starmer, AJ, Spector, ND, Srivastava, R, West, DC, Rosenbluth, G, Allen, AD, et al.. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1803–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1405556.Search in Google Scholar
8. Li, P, Stelfox, HT, Ghali, WA. A prospective observational study of physician handoff for intensive-care-unit-to-ward patient transfers. Am J Med 2011;124:860–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Herbst, LA, Desai, S, Benscoter, D, Jerardi, K, Meier, KA, Statile, AM, et al.. Going back to the ward-transitioning care back to the ward team. Transl Pediatr 2018;7:314–25. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2018.08.01.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Santhosh, L, Rojas, JC, Garcia, B, Thomashow, M, Lyons, PG. Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE tool for intensive care unit-ward transitions. ATS Sch 2022;3:312–23. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0135in.Search in Google Scholar
11. Lyon, AR, Brewer, SK, Areán, PA. Leveraging human-centered design to implement modern psychological science: return on an early investment. Am Psychol 2020;75:1067–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000652.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Sittig, DF, Singh, H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(3 Suppl):i68–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.042085.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Locke, K. The grounded theory approach to qualitative research. In: Drasgow, F, Schmitt, N, editors. Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: advances in measurement and data analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.Search in Google Scholar
14. Huang, GC, Kriegel, G, Wheaton, C, Sternberg, S, Sands, K, Richards, J, et al.. Implementation of diagnostic pauses in the ambulatory setting. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:492–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007192.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Yale, SC, Cohen, SS, Kliegman, RM, Bordini, BJ. A pause in pediatrics: implementation of a pediatric diagnostic time-out. Diagnosis 2022;9:348–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2022-0010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Meyer, AND, Giardina, TD, Khawaja, L, Singh, H. Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Counsel 2021;104:2606–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Bhise, V, Rajan, SS, Sittig, DF, Morgan, RO, Chaudhary, P, Singh, H. Defining and measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medicine: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:103–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4164-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Lane-Fall, MB, Christakos, A, Russell, GC, Hose, BZ, Dauer, ED, Greilich, PE, et al.. Handoffs and transitions in critical care-understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Implement Sci 2021;16:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Kahn, JM. Bringing implementation science to the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2017;23:398–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcc.0000000000000446.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Abraham, J, Kannampallil, T, Patel, VL. A systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of handoff tools: implications for research and practice. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2014;21:154–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001351.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
